Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0110136 · International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Quantum Algorithm for Hilbert's Tenth Problem

Tien D. Kieu

Published Jul 1, 2003• 81 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1023/a:1025780028846

Related papers

On quantum algorithms

Richard Cleve, ARTUR K. EKERT, Leah Henderson +2 more

Complexity•Sep 1, 1998•30 citations

Quantum algorithms for the Hilbert's tenth problem

Tien D. Kieu

A quantum algorithm is presented for the classically non-computable Hilbert's tenth problem, which ultimately links to the Turing halting problem.

•Oct 24, 2001•5 citations

Quantum adiabatic algorithm for Hilbert's tenth problem: I. The algorithm

Tien D. Kieu

We review the proposal of a quantum algorithm for Hilbert's tenth problem and provide further arguments towards the proof that: (i) the algorithm terminates after a finite time for any input of Diophantine equation; (ii) the final ground state which contains the answer for the Diophantine equation can be identified as the component state having better-than-even probability to be found by measurement at the end time--even though probability for the final ground state in a quantum adiabatic process need not monotonically increase towards one in general. Presented finally are the reasons why our algorithm is outside the jurisdiction of no-go arguments previously employed to show that Hilbert's tenth problem is recursively non-computable.

arXiv:quant-ph/0310052•Oct 8, 2003•26 citations

On quantum algorithms

CleveRichard, EkertArtur, HendersonLea +2 more

Complexity•Sep 1, 1998•0 citations

Hilbert's Incompleteness, Chaitin's ΩΩΩ number and Quantum Physics

Tien D. Kieu

To explore the limitation of a class of quantum algorithms originally proposed for the Hilbert's tenth problem, we consider two further classes of mathematically non-decidable problems, those of a modified version of the Hilbert's tenth problem and of the computation of the Chaitin's $Ω$ number, which is a representation of the Gödel's Incompletness theorem. Some interesting connection to Quantum Field Theory is pointed out.

arXiv:quant-ph/0111062•Nov 10, 2001•2 citations

Quantum Algorithms II

Masanori Ohya, Igor Vasil'evich Volovich

Theoretical and mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations
We review the proposal of a quantum algorithm for Hilbert's tenth problem and provide further arguments towards the proof that: (i) the algorithm terminates after a finite time for any input of Diophantine equation; (ii) the final ground state which contains the answer for the Diophantine equation can be identified as the component state having better-than-even probability to be found by measurement at the end time--even though probability for the final ground state in a quantum adiabatic process need not monotonically increase towards one in general. Presented finally are the reasons why our algorithm is outside the jurisdiction of no-go arguments previously employed to show that Hilbert's tenth problem is recursively non-computable.
To explore the limitation of a class of quantum algorithms originally proposed for the Hilbert's tenth problem, we consider two further classes of mathematically non-decidable problems, those of a modified version of the Hilbert's tenth problem and of the computation of the Chaitin's ΩΩΩ number, which is a representation of the Gödel's Incompletness theorem. Some interesting connection to Quantum Field Theory is pointed out.