Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0110015 · Physics Letters A

On non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computer

Alexander Shalyt-Margolin, В. И. Стражев, A. Ya. Tregubovich

Published May 13, 2003• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(03)00677-7

Related papers

Non-Adiabatic Holonomic Quantum Gates in an atomic system

Vahid Azimi Mousolou, C. M. Canali, Erik Sjöqvist

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 2, 2012•0 citations

Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum operations in continuous variable systems

Hao-Long Zhang, Yi‐Hao Kang, Fan Wu +2 more

arXiv:2402.02373•Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•May 17, 2024•5 citations

Brachistochrone Non-Adiabatic Holonomic Quantum Control

Bao-Jie Liu, Zheng‐Yuan Xue, Man‐Hong Yung

In quantum control, geometrical operations could provide an extra layer of robustness against control errors. However, the conventional non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation (NHQC) is limited by the fact that all of the operations require exactly the same amount of evolution time, even for a small-angle rotation. Furthermore, NHQC confines the driving part of the Hamiltonian to strictly cover a fixed pulse area, making it sensitive to control errors. Here we present an unconventional approach of NHQC, termed brachistochronic NHQC, for bypassing these limitations. Specifically, with B-NHQC, non-Abelian geometric gates can be time-optimized by following the brachistochrone curve, minimizing the impact from the environmental decoherence. Additionally, we demonstrate that B-NHQC is compatible with composed pulses, which can further enhance the robustness against pulse errors. For benchmarking, we provide a thorough analysis on the performance of B-NHQC under experimental conditions; we found that the gate error can be reduced by as much as 64% compared with NHQC.

arXiv:2001.05182•Jan 15, 2020•9 citations

Mathematical foundations of holonomic quantum computer

Kazuyuki Fujii

arXiv:quant-ph/0004102•Reports on Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2001•12 citations

Holonomic quantum computation

Paolo Zanardi A, Mario Rasetti

arXiv:quant-ph/9904011•Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 1999•1,006 citations

Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation

Erik Sjöqvist, D. M. Tong, L. Mauritz Andersson +3 more

We develop a non-adiabatic generalization of holonomic quantum computation in which high-speed universal quantum gates can be realized using non-Abelian geometric phases. We show how a set of non-adiabatic holonomic one- and two-qubit gates can be implemented by utilizing optical transitions in a generic three-level Λ configuration. Our scheme opens up the possibility of realizing universal holonomic quantum computation on qubits characterized by short coherence time.

arXiv:1107.5127•New Journal of Physics•Oct 23, 2012•398 citations
In quantum control, geometrical operations could provide an extra layer of robustness against control errors. However, the conventional non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation (NHQC) is limited by the fact that all of the operations require exactly the same amount of evolution time, even for a small-angle rotation. Furthermore, NHQC confines the driving part of the Hamiltonian to strictly cover a fixed pulse area, making it sensitive to control errors. Here we present an unconventional approach of NHQC, termed brachistochronic NHQC, for bypassing these limitations. Specifically, with B-NHQC, non-Abelian geometric gates can be time-optimized by following the brachistochrone curve, minimizing the impact from the environmental decoherence. Additionally, we demonstrate that B-NHQC is compatible with composed pulses, which can further enhance the robustness against pulse errors. For benchmarking, we provide a thorough analysis on the performance of B-NHQC under experimental conditions; we found that the gate error can be reduced by as much as 64% compared with NHQC.