Quantum information complexity (QIC), introduced by Touchette [Touchette, STOC 2015], has been shown to be one of the most powerful methods for proving quantum communication complexity and has also been shown to be equal to amortized quantum communication complexity. Unfortunately, QIC is generally hard to analyze because it is a sum of quantum conditional mutual information terms, which are difficult to estimate. In this work, we introduce a new variational approach, the information potential, for analyzing QIC and proving quantum communication lower bounds inspired by the resolvent representation for quantum relative entropy. This approach connects the QIC of individual messages to a quadratic form, making it more amenable and thus enables us to bound the cumulative positive increments of the potential throughout an interactive quantum protocol by its QIC. Lower bounds on the growth of the potential therefore translate into lower bounds on both QIC and quantum communication complexity.
As an application, we give an optimal
Ω(1/r) lower bound on the QIC of the two-bit
AND function as well as an optimal
Ω(n/r) lower bound on the quantum communication complexity of
r-round Set-Disjointness, answering an open problem in~[Braverman, Garg, Ko, Mao, Touchette FOCS 2015]. Moreover, we further prove a direct-sum theorem for bounded-round quantum communication complexity of Set Disjointness. With the tight bound on the QIC of
AND function, we further establish a nearly tight tradeoff for the asymmetric quantum communication complexity of
SetDisjointness:
(qA+1)(qB+1)=Ω(n), where
qA and
qB denote the total numbers of qubits sent by Alice and Bob, respectively.
Equality and disjointness are two of the most studied problems in communication complexity. They have been studied for both classical and also quantum communication and for various models and modes of communication. Buhrman et al. [Buh98] proved that the exact quantum communication complexity for a promise version of the equality problem is
O(logn) while the classical deterministic communication complexity is
n+1 for two-way communication, which was the first impressively large (exponential) gap between quantum and classical (deterministic and probabilistic) communication complexity. If an error is tolerated, both quantum and probabilistic communication complexities for equality are
O(logn). However, even if an error is tolerated, the gaps between quantum (probabilistic) and deterministic complexity are not larger than quadratic for the disjointness problem. It is therefore interesting to ask whether there are some promise versions of the disjointness problem for which bigger gaps can be shown. We give a positive answer to such a question. Namely, we prove that there exists an exponential gap between quantum (even probabilistic) communication complexity and classical deterministic communication complexity of some specific versions of the disjointness problem. Klauck [Kla00] proved, for any language, that the state complexity of exact quantum/classical finite automata, which is a general model of one-way quantum finite automata, is not less than the state complexity of an equivalent one-way deterministic finite automata (1DFA). In this paper we show, using a communication complexity result, that situation may be different for some promise problems. Namely, we show for certain promise problem that the gap between the state complexity of exact one-way quantum finite automata and 1DFA can be exponential.