Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0108031 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Schwinger, Pegg and Barnett approaches and a relationship between angular and Cartesian quantum descriptions

M. Ruzzi

Published Feb 11, 2002• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

From development of an original idea due to Schwinger, it is shown that it is possible to recover, from the quantum description of a degree of freedom characterized by a finite number of states (i.e., without a classical counterpart), the usual canonical variables of position/momentum and angle/angular momentum, the latter appearing, perhaps surprisingly, as a limit of the first.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/35/7/320

Related papers

Schwinger and Pegg-Barnett approaches and a relationship between angular and Cartesian quantum descriptions: II. Phase spaces

M. Ruzzi, D. Galetti

Following the discussion - in state-space language - presented in a preceding paper, we work on the passage from the phase-space description of a degree of freedom described by a finite number of states (without classical counterpart) to one described by an infinite (and continuously labelled) number of states. With this it is possible to relate an original Schwinger idea to the Pegg-Barnett approach to the phase problem. In phase-space language, this discussion shows that one can obtain the Weyl-Wigner formalism, for both Cartesian and angular coordinates, as limiting elements of the discrete phase-space formalism.

arXiv:quant-ph/0202043•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•May 18, 2002•17 citations

Wigner distribution for angle coordinates in quantum mechanics

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

The method of Wigner distribution functions, and the Weyl correspondence between quantum and classical variables, are extended from the usual kind of canonically conjugate position and momentum operators to the case of an angle and angular momentum operator pair. The sense in which one has a description of quantum mechanics using classical phase-space language is much clarified by this extension.

American Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 1979•74 citations

Quantum formulation of angle and orbital angular momentum

Jörg B. Götte, Stephen Mark Barnett

The quantum mechanical description of the azimuthal rotation angle and the orbital angular momentum around the polar axis differs greatly from the description of position and momentum. This has led to a controversy over the existence of a self-adjoint angle operator in the literature. It is possible to circumvent the problems of defining a self-adjoint operator for a periodic variable by using trigonometric functions of operators as a basis for the quantum mechanical description. This approach, however, does not allow us to study the properties of the angle operator itself. By using a state space of an arbitrarily large yet finite number of dimensions, it is possible to introduce angle and orbital angular momentum as a conjugate pair of variables both represented by Hermitian matrices. After physical and measurable quantities have been calculated in this state space the number of dimensions is allowed to tend to infinity in a limiting procedure. The first part of this chapter reviews the difficulties associated with the quantum mechanical formulation of angle and orbital angular momentum and presents a way to overcome these problems using a finite-dimensional state space. In the second part this formulation is generalised to include the phenomenon of non-integer orbital angular momentum. This part is based on a chapter of the PhD thesis of Götte [1], where further details may be found. Introduction The correct description of a periodic variable such as a rotation angle or the optical phase has been a long standing problem in quantum mechanics. At the root of the problem is the question of whether the variable itself is restricted in a 2 π radian range or whether it evolves continuously without bound.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 8, 2012•2 citations

The basis of statistical quantum mechanics

P. A. M. Dirac

In classical mechanics the state of a dynamical system at any particular time can be described by the values of a set of coordinates and their conjugate momenta, thus, if the system has n degrees of freedom, by 2n numbers. In quantum mechanics, on the other hand, we have to describe a state of the system by a wave function involving a set of coordinates, thus by a function of n variables. The quantum description is, therefore, much more complicated than the classical one. Let us consider, however, an ensemble of systems in Gibbs' sense, i.e. not a large number of actual systems which could, perhaps, interact with one another, but a large number of hypothetical systems which are introduced to describe one actual system of which our knowledge is only of a statistical nature. The basis of the quantum treatment of such an ensemble has been given by Neumann. The description obtained by Neumann of an ensemble on the quantum theory is no more complicated than the corresponding classical description. Thus the quantum theory, which appears to such a disadvantage on the score of complication when applied to individual systems, recovers its own when applied to an ensemble. It is the object of the present note to examine this question more closely and to show how complete the analogy is between the quantum and classical treatments of an ensemble.

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society•Jan 1, 1929•89 citations

Comment on the quantum nature of angular momentum using a coupled-boson representation

Ilki Kim, GERALD J. IAFRATE

A simple approach for understanding the quantum nature of angular momentum and its reduction to the classical limit is presented based on Schwinger's coupled-boson representation. This approach leads to a straightforward explanation of why the square of the angular momentum in quantum mechanics is given by j(j+1) instead of just j^2, where j is the angular momentum quantum number.

arXiv:quant-ph/0511259•Nov 29, 2005•0 citations

The relationship between classical phases in cartesian and action-angle variables

Simon J. Fraser, Luis Gottdiener, John Norman Murrell

The relationship between the momentum representation of the classical phase in action-angle variables and the coordinate representation in cartesian coordinates has terms which are associated with discontinuities in the f 2 generator of the transformation between the two coordinate systems. The importance of these terms has not been emphasized in some earlier work.

Molecular Physics•Feb 1, 1975•30 citations
From development of an original idea due to Schwinger, it is shown that it is possible to recover, from the quantum description of a degree of freedom characterized by a finite number of states (i.e., without a classical counterpart), the usual canonical variables of position/momentum and angle/angular momentum, the latter appearing, perhaps surprisingly, as a limit of the first.
Following the discussion - in state-space language - presented in a preceding paper, we work on the passage from the phase-space description of a degree of freedom described by a finite number of states (without classical counterpart) to one described by an infinite (and continuously labelled) number of states. With this it is possible to relate an original Schwinger idea to the Pegg-Barnett approach to the phase problem. In phase-space language, this discussion shows that one can obtain the Weyl-Wigner formalism, for both Cartesian and angular coordinates, as limiting elements of the discrete phase-space formalism.
The quantum mechanical description of the azimuthal rotation angle and the orbital angular momentum around the polar axis differs greatly from the description of position and momentum. This has led to a controversy over the existence of a self-adjoint angle operator in the literature. It is possible to circumvent the problems of defining a self-adjoint operator for a periodic variable by using trigonometric functions of operators as a basis for the quantum mechanical description. This approach, however, does not allow us to study the properties of the angle operator itself. By using a state space of an arbitrarily large yet finite number of dimensions, it is possible to introduce angle and orbital angular momentum as a conjugate pair of variables both represented by Hermitian matrices. After physical and measurable quantities have been calculated in this state space the number of dimensions is allowed to tend to infinity in a limiting procedure. The first part of this chapter reviews the difficulties associated with the quantum mechanical formulation of angle and orbital angular momentum and presents a way to overcome these problems using a finite-dimensional state space. In the second part this formulation is generalised to include the phenomenon of non-integer orbital angular momentum. This part is based on a chapter of the PhD thesis of Götte [1], where further details may be found. Introduction The correct description of a periodic variable such as a rotation angle or the optical phase has been a long standing problem in quantum mechanics. At the root of the problem is the question of whether the variable itself is restricted in a 2 π radian range or whether it evolves continuously without bound.
In classical mechanics the state of a dynamical system at any particular time can be described by the values of a set of coordinates and their conjugate momenta, thus, if the system has n degrees of freedom, by 2n numbers. In quantum mechanics, on the other hand, we have to describe a state of the system by a wave function involving a set of coordinates, thus by a function of n variables. The quantum description is, therefore, much more complicated than the classical one. Let us consider, however, an ensemble of systems in Gibbs' sense, i.e. not a large number of actual systems which could, perhaps, interact with one another, but a large number of hypothetical systems which are introduced to describe one actual system of which our knowledge is only of a statistical nature. The basis of the quantum treatment of such an ensemble has been given by Neumann. The description obtained by Neumann of an ensemble on the quantum theory is no more complicated than the corresponding classical description. Thus the quantum theory, which appears to such a disadvantage on the score of complication when applied to individual systems, recovers its own when applied to an ensemble. It is the object of the present note to examine this question more closely and to show how complete the analogy is between the quantum and classical treatments of an ensemble.