Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0106098 · Physics Letters A

Signal-locality in hidden-variables theories

Antony Valentini

Published May 1, 2002• 124 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(02)00438-3

Related papers

Signal-Locality and Subquantum Information in Deterministic Hidden-Variables Theories

Antony Valentini

arXiv:quant-ph/0112151•Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2002•17 citations

Hidden variable theories without non-local signalling and their experimental tests

Shasanka Mohan Roy, Virendra Singh

Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 1989•10 citations

A counter-argument to "Hidden variable models for quantum theory cannot have any local part" arXiv:0801.2218

Sofia Wechsler

Colbeck and Renner [arXiv:0801.2218] analyzed a class of combined models for entanglements in which local and non-local hidden variables cooperate for producing the measurement results. They came to the conclusion that the measurement results are fully independent of the local components of the hidden variables. Their conclusion is based mainly on an assumption on the local hidden variables, assumption similar to the non-signaling property of probabilities of observables' values. In the present text it is proved that hidden variables are not observables, so their distributions of probabilities do not necessarily possess the non-signaling property. Also, a counter-example is brought to the Colbeck and Renner assumption, showing that their type of models and conclusion are not general. The question whether hidden variables, local or non-local, exist or not, remains open.

arXiv:0907.2396•Jul 14, 2009•1 citation

A Survey of Hidden-Variables Theories

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1973•177 citations

Defining the local part of a hidden variable model: a comment

Roger Colbeck, Renato Renner

In [Physical Review Letters 101, 050403 (2008)], we showed that quantum theory cannot be explained by a hidden variable model with a non-trivial local part. The purpose of this comment is to clarify our notion of local part, which seems to have caused some confusion in the recent literature. This notion is based on Bell's and demands that local hidden variables are physical, the idea being that, if discovered, they would not contradict basic physical principles. We explain why the recent supposed "counterexamples" that have appeared are not counterexamples to our theorem--in fact they are based on a definition of local hidden variables which would allow signalling and is therefore not physical.

arXiv:0907.4967•Jul 28, 2009•2 citations

Proof of the Existence of Universal Temporal Order in Spacetime

Shen Gao

There are two issues concerning hidden variables in quantum mechanics: 1.Whether the outcomes of quantum measurements are hidden variables has long been debated. Experiments violating Bell's inequalities have essentially refuted local hidden variable theories. 2.Quantum entanglement provides nonlocal effects that alter wave functions. However, these changes cannot transmit signals, making the exact time of such nonlocal effects a hidden variable. Theories about hidden variables are difficult to verify experimentally due to their unobservability. This paper connects these two hidden variable theories in quantum mechanics, proposing the spacetime relationship that nonlocal effects from entanglement must satisfy to prevent quantum measurement outcomes from being local hidden variables. It further outlines the spacetime relationship that any causal effects should adhere to. Based on this, the paper demonstrates the universal temporal order between relativistic spacelike events. On this foundation, it integrates the locally deterministic relativistic spacetime structure with the nonlocal phenomena of probabilistic quantum mechanics, thereby establishing the universal ordered spacetime structure. key words: ordered spacetime structure ; local hidden variable ; nonlocal effects; uncertainty principle;

•Feb 15, 2026•0 citations
Colbeck and Renner [arXiv:0801.2218] analyzed a class of combined models for entanglements in which local and non-local hidden variables cooperate for producing the measurement results. They came to the conclusion that the measurement results are fully independent of the local components of the hidden variables. Their conclusion is based mainly on an assumption on the local hidden variables, assumption similar to the non-signaling property of probabilities of observables' values. In the present text it is proved that hidden variables are not observables, so their distributions of probabilities do not necessarily possess the non-signaling property. Also, a counter-example is brought to the Colbeck and Renner assumption, showing that their type of models and conclusion are not general. The question whether hidden variables, local or non-local, exist or not, remains open.
In [Physical Review Letters 101, 050403 (2008)], we showed that quantum theory cannot be explained by a hidden variable model with a non-trivial local part. The purpose of this comment is to clarify our notion of local part, which seems to have caused some confusion in the recent literature. This notion is based on Bell's and demands that local hidden variables are physical, the idea being that, if discovered, they would not contradict basic physical principles. We explain why the recent supposed "counterexamples" that have appeared are not counterexamples to our theorem--in fact they are based on a definition of local hidden variables which would allow signalling and is therefore not physical.
There are two issues concerning hidden variables in quantum mechanics: 1.Whether the outcomes of quantum measurements are hidden variables has long been debated. Experiments violating Bell's inequalities have essentially refuted local hidden variable theories. 2.Quantum entanglement provides nonlocal effects that alter wave functions. However, these changes cannot transmit signals, making the exact time of such nonlocal effects a hidden variable. Theories about hidden variables are difficult to verify experimentally due to their unobservability. This paper connects these two hidden variable theories in quantum mechanics, proposing the spacetime relationship that nonlocal effects from entanglement must satisfy to prevent quantum measurement outcomes from being local hidden variables. It further outlines the spacetime relationship that any causal effects should adhere to. Based on this, the paper demonstrates the universal temporal order between relativistic spacelike events. On this foundation, it integrates the locally deterministic relativistic spacetime structure with the nonlocal phenomena of probabilistic quantum mechanics, thereby establishing the universal ordered spacetime structure. key words: ordered spacetime structure ; local hidden variable ; nonlocal effects; uncertainty principle;