Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0103070

Observables in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

R. Srikanth

Published Mar 13, 2001• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We propose a quantum clock synchronization protocol in which Bob makes a remote measurement on Alice's quantum clock via a third qubit acting as its proxy. It is shown that the resulting correlations are dependent on the choice of the hypersurface along which Bob's measurement of the proxy is deemed to collapse the entangled state vector. A proper characterization of observables in relativistic quantum mechanics is therefore constrained by relativistic covariance as well as causality.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0103070

Related papers

Entanglement-based quantum clock synchronization

Ebubechukwu O. Ilo-Okeke, Louis Tessler, Jonathan P. Dowling +1 more

Synchronizing clocks using quantum entanglement works on the principle that two clocks Alice and Bob share between them a singlet state which is a stationary state that is immune to evolution under bare atomic Hamiltonian. A major obstacle to its realization is the hidden assumption of a common phase reference between the clocks. Without hidden assumption, a clock state of Alice or Bob is not a uniquely defined quantum state because the phase of the state is arbitrary. This results in an unknown relative phase in a two-particle entangled state defined by the clocks. We show that using entanglement purification, an entanglement-based clock synchronization is achieved despite earlier results showing the contrary. This closes the loophole for entanglement based quantum clock synchronization protocols, which is a non-local approach to synchronize two clocks independent of the properties of the intervening medium.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2020•12 citations

The Overtime Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Stanislav Vasilyev

A key conceptual achievement of special relativity was the abandonment of absolute time and the introduction of an operational definition of simultaneity through clock synchronization. Building on Einstein’s operational treatment of simultaneity, we extend the logic of clock synchronization to the quantum domain. Within the Overtime interpretation, quantum systems evolve in an internal time τ that becomes related to the observer’s time t only through synchronization. Measurement is thus understood as a temporal embedding rather than a physical collapse. Crucially, this resolution requires no new ontological entities—no additional state vectors, hidden variables, collapse mechanisms, or cosmological boundary conditions. The parameter τ is simply the standard ordering parameter of the Schrödinger equation, reinterpreted as system-intrinsic. This approach preserves all standard quantum predictions, maintains relativistic causality, and offers a unified conceptual framework for superposition, entanglement, delayed-choice phenomena, and the apparent discontinuity of measurement. The interpretation naturally aligns with the operational logic of special relativity and clarifies the role of entropy and the arrow of time in distinguishing macroscopic and microscopic systems.

•Feb 7, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Clock Synchronization Based on Shared Prior Entanglement

Richard Jozsa, Daniel S. Abrams, Jonathan P. Dowling +1 more

We demonstrate that two spatially separated parties (Alice and Bob) can utilize shared prior quantum entanglement, and classical communications, to establish a synchronized pair of atomic clocks. In contrast to classical synchronization schemes, the accuracy of our protocol is independent of Alice's or Bob's knowledge of their relative locations or of the properties of the intervening medium.

arXiv:quant-ph/0004105•Physical Review Letters•Aug 28, 2000•361 citations

Causal and localizable quantum operations

David Beckman, Daniel Gottesman, Michael A. Nielsen +1 more

We examine constraints on quantum operations imposed by relativistic causality. A bipartite superoperator is said to be localizable if it can be implemented by two parties (Alice and Bob) who share entanglement but do not communicate; it is causal if the superoperator does not convey information from Alice to Bob or from Bob to Alice. We characterize the general structure of causal complete-measurement superoperators, and exhibit examples that are causal but not localizable. We construct another class of causal bipartite superoperators that are not localizable by invoking bounds on the strength of correlations among the parts of a quantum system. A bipartite superoperator is said to be semilocalizable if it can be implemented with one-way quantum communication from Alice to Bob, and it is semicausal if it conveys no information from Bob to Alice. We show that all semicausal complete-measurement superoperators are semilocalizable, and we establish a general criterion for semicausality. In the multipartite case, we observe that a measurement superoperator that projects onto the eigenspaces of a stabilizer code is localizable.

arXiv:quant-ph/0102043•Physical Review A•Oct 12, 2001•209 citations

Remote quantum clock synchronization without synchronized clocks

Ebubechukwu O. Ilo-Okeke, Louis Tessler, Jonathan P. Dowling +1 more

Abstract A major outstanding problem for many quantum clock synchronization protocols is the hidden assumption of a common phase reference between the parties to be synchronized. In general, the definition of the quantum states between two parties do not have consistent phase definitions, which can lead to an unknown systematic error. We show that despite prior arguments to the contrary, it is possible to remove this unknown phase via entanglement purification. This closes the loophole for entanglement based quantum clock synchronization protocols, which is a non-local approach to synchronize two clocks independent of the properties of the intervening medium. Starting with noisy Bell pairs, we show that the scheme produces a singlet state for any combination of (i) differing basis conventions for Alice and Bob; (ii) an overall time offset in the execution of the purification algorithm; and (iii) the presence of a noisy channel. Error estimates reveal that better performance than existing classical Einstein synchronization protocols should be achievable using current technology.

arXiv:1709.08423•npj Quantum Information•Aug 9, 2018•78 citations

Can we make sense out of the measurement process in relativistic quantum mechanics?

Yakir Aharonov, David Z. Albert

We study the instantaneity of the state-reduction process in relativistic quantum mechanics. The conclusion of various authors that this instantaneity will restrict the set of relativistic observables to purely local ones (i.e., that the measurement of any nonlocal property of a system at a well-defined time would give rise to violations of relativistic causality) is found to be erroneous, and experiments (of a kind not encountered before in measurement theory) are described whereby certain nonlocal properties of some simple physical systems can be measured at a well-defined time without violating causality. The attempts of certain authors to reconcile the reduction process with the covariance of the relativistic quantum state are considered and found wanting, and it is argued that the covariance of relativistic quantum theories resides exclusively in the experimental probabilities, and not in the underlying quantum states. The problem of nonlocal measurement is considered in general: distinctions (which are not to be met with in the nonrelativistic case) arise in relativistic quantum mechanics between what can be measured for fermions and what can be measured for bosons, between what can be measured for individual systems and what can be measured for ensembles, and between what kinds of states can be verified by measurement and what kinds of states can be prepared by measurement; and these pose difficult questions about the nature of measurement itself.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Jul 15, 1981•218 citations
We propose a quantum clock synchronization protocol in which Bob makes a remote measurement on Alice's quantum clock via a third qubit acting as its proxy. It is shown that the resulting correlations are dependent on the choice of the hypersurface along which Bob's measurement of the proxy is deemed to collapse the entangled state vector. A proper characterization of observables in relativistic quantum mechanics is therefore constrained by relativistic covariance as well as causality.
Synchronizing clocks using quantum entanglement works on the principle that two clocks Alice and Bob share between them a singlet state which is a stationary state that is immune to evolution under bare atomic Hamiltonian. A major obstacle to its realization is the hidden assumption of a common phase reference between the clocks. Without hidden assumption, a clock state of Alice or Bob is not a uniquely defined quantum state because the phase of the state is arbitrary. This results in an unknown relative phase in a two-particle entangled state defined by the clocks. We show that using entanglement purification, an entanglement-based clock synchronization is achieved despite earlier results showing the contrary. This closes the loophole for entanglement based quantum clock synchronization protocols, which is a non-local approach to synchronize two clocks independent of the properties of the intervening medium.
A key conceptual achievement of special relativity was the abandonment of absolute time and the introduction of an operational definition of simultaneity through clock synchronization. Building on Einstein’s operational treatment of simultaneity, we extend the logic of clock synchronization to the quantum domain. Within the Overtime interpretation, quantum systems evolve in an internal time τ that becomes related to the observer’s time t only through synchronization. Measurement is thus understood as a temporal embedding rather than a physical collapse. Crucially, this resolution requires no new ontological entities—no additional state vectors, hidden variables, collapse mechanisms, or cosmological boundary conditions. The parameter τ is simply the standard ordering parameter of the Schrödinger equation, reinterpreted as system-intrinsic. This approach preserves all standard quantum predictions, maintains relativistic causality, and offers a unified conceptual framework for superposition, entanglement, delayed-choice phenomena, and the apparent discontinuity of measurement. The interpretation naturally aligns with the operational logic of special relativity and clarifies the role of entropy and the arrow of time in distinguishing macroscopic and microscopic systems.
We examine constraints on quantum operations imposed by relativistic causality. A bipartite superoperator is said to be localizable if it can be implemented by two parties (Alice and Bob) who share entanglement but do not communicate; it is causal if the superoperator does not convey information from Alice to Bob or from Bob to Alice. We characterize the general structure of causal complete-measurement superoperators, and exhibit examples that are causal but not localizable. We construct another class of causal bipartite superoperators that are not localizable by invoking bounds on the strength of correlations among the parts of a quantum system. A bipartite superoperator is said to be semilocalizable if it can be implemented with one-way quantum communication from Alice to Bob, and it is semicausal if it conveys no information from Bob to Alice. We show that all semicausal complete-measurement superoperators are semilocalizable, and we establish a general criterion for semicausality. In the multipartite case, we observe that a measurement superoperator that projects onto the eigenspaces of a stabilizer code is localizable.
Abstract A major outstanding problem for many quantum clock synchronization protocols is the hidden assumption of a common phase reference between the parties to be synchronized. In general, the definition of the quantum states between two parties do not have consistent phase definitions, which can lead to an unknown systematic error. We show that despite prior arguments to the contrary, it is possible to remove this unknown phase via entanglement purification. This closes the loophole for entanglement based quantum clock synchronization protocols, which is a non-local approach to synchronize two clocks independent of the properties of the intervening medium. Starting with noisy Bell pairs, we show that the scheme produces a singlet state for any combination of (i) differing basis conventions for Alice and Bob; (ii) an overall time offset in the execution of the purification algorithm; and (iii) the presence of a noisy channel. Error estimates reveal that better performance than existing classical Einstein synchronization protocols should be achievable using current technology.
We study the instantaneity of the state-reduction process in relativistic quantum mechanics. The conclusion of various authors that this instantaneity will restrict the set of relativistic observables to purely local ones (i.e., that the measurement of any nonlocal property of a system at a well-defined time would give rise to violations of relativistic causality) is found to be erroneous, and experiments (of a kind not encountered before in measurement theory) are described whereby certain nonlocal properties of some simple physical systems can be measured at a well-defined time without violating causality. The attempts of certain authors to reconcile the reduction process with the covariance of the relativistic quantum state are considered and found wanting, and it is argued that the covariance of relativistic quantum theories resides exclusively in the experimental probabilities, and not in the underlying quantum states. The problem of nonlocal measurement is considered in general: distinctions (which are not to be met with in the nonrelativistic case) arise in relativistic quantum mechanics between what can be measured for fermions and what can be measured for bosons, between what can be measured for individual systems and what can be measured for ensembles, and between what kinds of states can be verified by measurement and what kinds of states can be prepared by measurement; and these pose difficult questions about the nature of measurement itself.