We show that the basic dynamical rules of quantum physics can be derived from its static properties and the condition that superluminal communication is forbidden. More precisely, the fact that the dynamics has to be described by linear completely positive maps on density matrices is derived from the following assumptions: (1) physical states are described by rays in a Hilbert space, (2) probabilities for measurement outcomes at any given time are calculated according to the usual trace rule, and (3) superluminal communication is excluded. This result also constrains possible nonlinear modifications of quantum physics.
We show that the basic dynamical rules of quantum physics can be derived from its static properties and the condition that superluminal communication is forbidden. More precisely, the fact that the dynamics has to be described by linear completely positive maps on density matrices is derived from the following assumptions: (1) physical states are described by rays in a Hilbert space, (2) probabilities for measurement outcomes at any given time are calculated according to the usual trace rule, and (3) superluminal communication is excluded. This result also constrains possible nonlinear modifications of quantum physics.
The quantum foundations literature contains dozens of "no-signaling" arguments that rely on the Born rule or, more generally, the positive operator-valued measure (POVM) framework to show that the resources of non-relativistic quantum mechanics (NRQM) cannot be used to send superluminal signals. What these arguments typically establish, however, is not a prohibition on superluminal signaling per se, but the seemingly stronger claim that signaling at any speed between mutually isolated systems is forbidden. This paper gives a precise formulation of this claim, the no-signaling hypothesis, and investigates the following converse question: under what additional assumptions does it imply that all experimental outcome probabilities are described by POVMs? Surprisingly few are needed: given the standard NRQM representation of composite experiments and two textbook claims about marginal probabilities, the no-signaling hypothesis is equivalent to the universality of the POVM framework. More broadly, by formalizing the relevant concepts and deriving the logical relationships between them, the paper shows that the no-signaling hypothesis can be used to derive most, though not all, of the probability-generating fragment of NRQM. The resulting map of implications clarifies which common postulates of NRQM are logically interrelated and which can be modified independently.
Nonlinear modifications of quantum mechanics have a troubled history. They were initially studied for many promising reasons: resolving the measurement problem, testing the limits of standard quantum mechanics, and reconciling it with gravity. Two results substantially undermined the credibility of non-linear theories. Some have been experimentally refuted, and more importantly, all deterministic non-linear theories can be used for superluminal communication. However, these results are unconvincing because they overlook the fact that the distribution of measurement results predicted by non-linear quantum mechanics depends on the interpretation of quantum mechanics that one uses. For instance, although the Everett and Copenhagen interpretations agree on the expression of Born's rule for the outcomes of multiple measurements in linear quantum mechanics, they disagree in non-linear quantum mechanics. We present the range of expressions of Born's rule that can be obtained by applying different formulations of quantum mechanics to a class of non-linear quantum theories. We then determine that many do not allow for superluminal communication but only two seem to have a reasonable justification. The first is the Everett interpretation, and the second, which we name causal-conditional, states that a measurement broadcasts its outcome to degrees of freedom in its future light-cone, who update the wavefunction that their non-linear Hamiltonian depends on according to this new information.
Nonlinear modifications of quantum mechanics have a troubled history.They were initially studied for many promising reasons: resolving the measurement problem, formulating a theory of quantum mechanics and gravity, and understanding the limits of standard quantum mechanics.However, certain non-linear theories have been experimentally tested and failed.More significantly, it has been shown that, in general, deterministic non-linear theories can be used for superluminal communication.We highlight another serious issue: the distribution of measurement results predicted by non-linear quantum mechanics depends on the formulation of quantum mechanics.In other words, Born's rule cannot be uniquely extended to non-linear quantum mechanics.We present these generalizations of Born's rule, and then examine whether some exclude superluminal communication.We determine that a large class do not allow for superluminal communication, but many lack a consistent definition.Nonetheless, we find a single extension of Born's rule with a sound operational definition, and that does not exhibit superluminal communication.The non-linear time-evolution leading to a certain measurement event is driven by the state conditioned on measurements that lie within the past light cone of that event.
A basic linearity of quantum dynamics, that density matrices are mapped linearly to density matrices, is proven very simply for a system that does not interact with anything else. It is assumed that at each time the physical quantities and states are described by the usual linear structures of quantum mechanics. Beyond that, the proof assumes only that the dynamics does not depend on anything outside the system but must allow the system to be described as part of a larger system. The basic linearity is linked with previously established results to complete a simple derivation of the linear Schr\"odinger equation. For this it is assumed that density matrices are mapped one-to-one onto density matrices. An alternative is to assume that pure states are mapped one-to-one onto pure states and that entropy does not decrease.
Quantum theory is compatible with special relativity. In particular, though measurements on entangled systems are correlated in a way that cannot be reproduced by local hidden variables, they cannot be used for superluminal signaling. As Czachor, Gisin, and Polchinski pointed out, this is not generally true of general nonlinear modifications of the Schr\"odinger equation. Excluding superluminal signaling has thus been taken to rule out most nonlinear versions of quantum theory. The no-superluminal-signaling constraint has also been used for alternative derivations of the optimal fidelities attainable for imperfect quantum cloning and other operations. These results apply to theories satisfying the rule that their predictions for widely separated and slowly moving entangled systems can be approximated by nonrelativistic equations of motion with respect to a preferred time coordinate. This paper describes a natural way in which this rule might fail to hold. In particular, it is shown that quantum readout devices which display the values of localized pure states need not allow superluminal signaling, provided that the devices display the values of the states of entangled subsystems as defined in a nonstandard, although natural, way. It follows that any locally defined nonlinear evolution of pure states can be made consistent with Minkowski causality.
Abstract Nonlinear quantum dynamics is often invoked in models trying to bridge the gap between the quantum micro-world and the classical macro-world. Such endeavours, however, encounter challenges at the nexus with relativity. In 1989 Nicolas Gisin proved a powerful no-go theorem, according to which nonlinear quantum dynamics would lead to superluminal signalling, violating Einstein’s causality. Here we analyse the theorem from the perspective of recent developments. First, we observe that it harmonises with the no-restriction hypothesis from General Probabilistic Theories. Second, we note that it requires a suitable synchronisation of Alice’s and Bob’s clocks and actions. Next, we argue that it does not automatically exclude the possibility of global nonlinear quantum dynamics on a tensor product Hilbert space. Consequently, we investigate a class of such dynamics inspired by discrete analogues of nonlinear Schrödinger equations. We show that, in general, they exhibit a chaotic character. In this context we inspect whether superluminal signalling can be avoided by relaxing the no-restriction hypothesis. We study three possible communication protocols involving either local measurements or modifications of a local Hamiltonian. We conclude that, in general, in all three cases, two spacelike separated parties can effectuate statistical superluminal information transfer. Nevertheless, we show an example of a nonlocal nonlinear quantum dynamics, which does not allow for it, provided that we relax the no-restriction hypothesis.