Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0101110 · Physical Review Letters

Quantum Communication between N Partners and Bell's Inequalities

Valerio Scarani, Nicolas Gisin

Published Aug 24, 2001• 232 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider a family of quantum communication protocols involving N partners. We demonstrate the existence of a link between the security of these protocols against individual attacks by the eavesdropper, and the violation of some Bell's inequalities, generalizing the link that was noticed some years ago for two-partners quantum cryptography. The arguments are independent of the local hidden variable debate.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.87.117901

Related papers

N-partners Quantum Communication and Bell's inequalities

Valerio Scarani, Nicolas Gisin

We present strong evidences for the existence of a link between the security of quantum communication protocols involving N partners and the violation of some Bell's inequalities. The link allows to establish optimal eavesdropping strategies for all N; in particular, we discuss eavesdropping on quantum secret sharing (N=3). The arguments are independent of the local hidden variable debate.

•Jan 23, 2001•1 citation

Quantum key distribution betweenNpartners: Optimal eavesdropping and Bell’s inequalities

Valerio Scarani, Nicolas Gisin

Quantum secret-sharing protocols involving N partners are key distribution protocols in which Alice encodes her key into $N\ensuremath{-}1$ qubits, in such a way that all the other partners must cooperate in order to retrieve the key. On these protocols, several eavesdropping scenarios are possible: some partners may want to reconstruct the key without the help of the other ones, and consequently collaborate with an Eve that eavesdrops on the other partners' channels. For each of these scenarios, we give the optimal individual attack that Eve can perform. A link with Bell's inequality is demonstrated analytically for half of the scenarios, and is conjectured on the basis of numerical estimates for the other scenarios: the authorized partners have a higher information on the key than the unauthorized ones if and only if they can violate a Bell's inequality.

arXiv:quant-ph/0104016•Physical Review A•Dec 12, 2001•63 citations

Device-Independent Security of Quantum Cryptography against Collective Attacks

Antonio Acín, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin +3 more

We present the optimal collective attack on a quantum key distribution protocol in the "device-independent" security scenario, where no assumptions are made about the way the quantum key distribution devices work or on what quantum system they operate. Our main result is a tight bound on the Holevo information between one of the authorized parties and the eavesdropper, as a function of the amount of violation of a Bell-type inequality.

arXiv:quant-ph/0702152•Physical Review Letters•Jun 4, 2007•1,711 citations

Quantum cryptography based on qutrit Bell inequalities

Dagomir Kaszlikowski, Daniel K. L. Oi, Matthias Christandl +4 more

We present a cryptographic protocol based upon entangled qutrit pairs. We analyze the scheme under a symmetric incoherent attack and plot the region for which the protocol is secure and compare this with the region of violations of certain Bell inequalities.

Physical Review A•Jan 21, 2003•76 citations

No Signaling and Quantum Key Distribution

Jonathan Barrett, Lucién Hardy, Adrian Kent

Standard quantum key distribution protocols are provably secure against eavesdropping attacks, if quantum theory is correct. It is theoretically interesting to know if we need to assume the validity of quantum theory to prove the security of quantum key distribution, or whether its security can be based on other physical principles. The question would also be of practical interest if quantum mechanics were ever to fail in some regime, because a scientifically and technologically advanced eavesdropper could perhaps use postquantum physics to extract information from quantum communications without necessarily causing the quantum state disturbances on which existing security proofs rely. Here we describe a key distribution scheme provably secure against general attacks by a postquantum eavesdropper limited only by the impossibility of superluminal signaling. Its security stems from violation of a Bell inequality.

arXiv:quant-ph/0405101•Physical Review Letters•Jun 27, 2005•918 citations

Unified criterion for security of secret sharing in terms of violation of Bell inequalities

Aditi Sen, Ujjwal Sen, Marek Żukowski

In secret sharing protocols, a secret is to be distributed among several partners such that leaving out any number of them, the rest do not have the complete information. Strong multiqubit correlations in the state by which secret sharing is carried out had been proposed as a criterion for security of such protocols against individual attacks by an eavesdropper. However we show that states with weak multiqubit correlations can also be used for secure secret sharing. That our state has weak multiqubit correlations is shown from the perspective of violation of local realism, and also by showing that its higher-order correlations are described by lower ones. We then present a unified criterion for security of secret sharing in terms of violation of local realism, which works when the secret sharing state is the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state (with strong multiqubit correlations), as well as states of a different class (with weak multiqubit correlations).

arXiv:quant-ph/0302156•Physical Review A•Sep 17, 2003•66 citations
We consider a family of quantum communication protocols involving N partners. We demonstrate the existence of a link between the security of these protocols against individual attacks by the eavesdropper, and the violation of some Bell's inequalities, generalizing the link that was noticed some years ago for two-partners quantum cryptography. The arguments are independent of the local hidden variable debate.
Quantum secret-sharing protocols involving N partners are key distribution protocols in which Alice encodes her key into $N\ensuremath{-}1$ qubits, in such a way that all the other partners must cooperate in order to retrieve the key. On these protocols, several eavesdropping scenarios are possible: some partners may want to reconstruct the key without the help of the other ones, and consequently collaborate with an Eve that eavesdrops on the other partners' channels. For each of these scenarios, we give the optimal individual attack that Eve can perform. A link with Bell's inequality is demonstrated analytically for half of the scenarios, and is conjectured on the basis of numerical estimates for the other scenarios: the authorized partners have a higher information on the key than the unauthorized ones if and only if they can violate a Bell's inequality.
Standard quantum key distribution protocols are provably secure against eavesdropping attacks, if quantum theory is correct. It is theoretically interesting to know if we need to assume the validity of quantum theory to prove the security of quantum key distribution, or whether its security can be based on other physical principles. The question would also be of practical interest if quantum mechanics were ever to fail in some regime, because a scientifically and technologically advanced eavesdropper could perhaps use postquantum physics to extract information from quantum communications without necessarily causing the quantum state disturbances on which existing security proofs rely. Here we describe a key distribution scheme provably secure against general attacks by a postquantum eavesdropper limited only by the impossibility of superluminal signaling. Its security stems from violation of a Bell inequality.
In secret sharing protocols, a secret is to be distributed among several partners such that leaving out any number of them, the rest do not have the complete information. Strong multiqubit correlations in the state by which secret sharing is carried out had been proposed as a criterion for security of such protocols against individual attacks by an eavesdropper. However we show that states with weak multiqubit correlations can also be used for secure secret sharing. That our state has weak multiqubit correlations is shown from the perspective of violation of local realism, and also by showing that its higher-order correlations are described by lower ones. We then present a unified criterion for security of secret sharing in terms of violation of local realism, which works when the secret sharing state is the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state (with strong multiqubit correlations), as well as states of a different class (with weak multiqubit correlations).