Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0010069

Quantum mechanics with the permitted hidden parameters

D. A. Slavnov

Published Oct 19, 2000• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Within the framework of the algebraic approach the problem of hidden parameters in quantum mechanics is surveyed. It is shown that the algebraic formulation of quantum mechanics permits introduction of a specific hidden parameter, which has the form of nonlinear functional on the algebra of observables. It is found out that the reasoning of von Neumann and of Bell about incompatibility of quantum mechanics with hidden parameters is inapplicable to the present case.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0010069

Related papers

WHY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO INTRODUCE HIDDEN PARAMETERS INTO QUANTUM MECHANICS

Alexander I. Akhiezer, R.V. Polovin

CONTENTS 1. The Statistical Character of the Behavior of Microobjects 500 2. The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics 501 3. The Measurement Process 502 4. The Hypothesis of Parameters 503 5. Interference of Probabilities and Hidden Parameters 505 6. Von Neumann's Proof of von Neumann's Theorem 507 7. A Proof of von Neumann's Theorem which does not use the Postulate of Additivity of Incompatible Observables 508 8. Classical and Quantum Logic 509 References 511

Soviet Physics Uspekhi•Apr 30, 1973•10 citations

A Proposed Solution of the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics by a Hidden Variable Theory

David Böhm, Jeffrey Bub

The measurement problem in quantum mechanics is re-examined and it is shown that it cannot really be solved in a satisfactory way, within the framework of the usual interpretation of the theory. We then discuss von Neumann's attempts to prove that quantum mechanics is incompatible with the introduction of hidden variables, and develop a more detailed form of Bell's argument, showing that von Neumann's analysis is invalid. Using certain ideas that are implicit in the "differential-space" theory of Wiener and Siegel, we go on to propose a new deterministic equation of motion, describing a kind of coupling of the measuring instrument to the observed system that explains in detail how the wave packet is "reduced" during a measurement in a continuous and causally determined way. By averaging over the hidden parameters, we then recover the usual statistical results of quantum mechanics as a special case. However, a more detailed analysis of the theory shows that new experimental and theoretical questions can now be raised, which go outside the framework of the quantum theory as it is now formulated. These questions are examined briefly.

Reviews of Modern Physics•Jul 1, 1966•426 citations

On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics

J. S. Bell

The demonstrations of von Neumann and others, that quantum mechanics does not permit a hidden variable interpretation, are reconsidered. It is shown that their essential axioms are unreasonable. It is urged that in further examination of this problem an interesting axiom would be that mutually distant systems are independent of one another.

Reviews of Modern Physics•Jul 1, 1966•2,843 citations

Hidden Variables and Incompatible Observables in Quantum Mechanics

Benjamin H. Feintzeig

This article takes up a suggestion that the reason we cannot find certain hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics, as in Bell’s theorem, is that we require them to assign joint probability distributions on incompatible observables. These joint distributions are problematic because they are empirically meaningless on one standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. Some have proposed getting around this problem by using generalized probability spaces. I present a theorem to show a sense in which generalized probability spaces can’t serve as hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics, so the proposal for getting around Bell’s theorem fails. 1 Introduction2 Bell’s Theorem and Classical Probability Spaces 2.1 Bell’s derivation of the Bell inequalities 2.2 Pitowsky’s derivation of the Bell inequalities3 Incompatible Observables4 Generalized Probability Spaces5 A ‘No-Go’ Theorem6 Conclusions

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Aug 31, 2014•5 citations

On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory

Yuichiro Kitajima

There have been many discussions about whether all observational propositions in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics can be taken as simultaneously definite without contradiction. Von Neumann, Jauch and Piron, and Bell have shown that not all observational propositions in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics can be interpreted in this way. In the present paper, I examine these theorems from an operator algebraic point view in order to apply these theorems to algebraic quantum field theory. Then I point out that not all observational propositions in local algebras can be taken as definite, in addition to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.

Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science•Jan 1, 2006•5 citations

On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics

James S. Bell

Introduction To know the quantum mechanical state of a system implies, in general, only statistical restrictions on the results of measurements. It seems interesting to ask if this statistical element be thought of as arising, as in classical statistical mechanics, because the states in question are averages over better defined states for which individually the results would be quite determined. These hypothetical ‘dispersion free’ states would be specified not only by the quantum mechanical state vector but also by additional ‘hidden variables’ – ‘hidden’ because if states with prescribed values of these variables could actually be prepared, quantum mechanics would be observably inadequate. Whether this question is indeed interesting has been the subject of debate. The present paper does not contribute to that debate. It is addressed to those who do find the question interesting, and more particularly to those among them who believe that ‘the question concerning the existence of such hidden variables received an early and rather decisive answer in the form of von Neumann's proof on the mathematical impossibility of such variables in quantum theory.’ An attempt will be made to clarify what von Neumann and his successors actually demonstrated. This will cover, as well as von Neumann's treatment, the recent version of the argument by Jauch and Piron, and the stronger result consequent on the work of Gleason. It will be urged that these analyses leave the real question untouched.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jun 3, 2004•12 citations
Within the framework of the algebraic approach the problem of hidden parameters in quantum mechanics is surveyed. It is shown that the algebraic formulation of quantum mechanics permits introduction of a specific hidden parameter, which has the form of nonlinear functional on the algebra of observables. It is found out that the reasoning of von Neumann and of Bell about incompatibility of quantum mechanics with hidden parameters is inapplicable to the present case.
The measurement problem in quantum mechanics is re-examined and it is shown that it cannot really be solved in a satisfactory way, within the framework of the usual interpretation of the theory. We then discuss von Neumann's attempts to prove that quantum mechanics is incompatible with the introduction of hidden variables, and develop a more detailed form of Bell's argument, showing that von Neumann's analysis is invalid. Using certain ideas that are implicit in the "differential-space" theory of Wiener and Siegel, we go on to propose a new deterministic equation of motion, describing a kind of coupling of the measuring instrument to the observed system that explains in detail how the wave packet is "reduced" during a measurement in a continuous and causally determined way. By averaging over the hidden parameters, we then recover the usual statistical results of quantum mechanics as a special case. However, a more detailed analysis of the theory shows that new experimental and theoretical questions can now be raised, which go outside the framework of the quantum theory as it is now formulated. These questions are examined briefly.
This article takes up a suggestion that the reason we cannot find certain hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics, as in Bell’s theorem, is that we require them to assign joint probability distributions on incompatible observables. These joint distributions are problematic because they are empirically meaningless on one standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. Some have proposed getting around this problem by using generalized probability spaces. I present a theorem to show a sense in which generalized probability spaces can’t serve as hidden variable theories for quantum mechanics, so the proposal for getting around Bell’s theorem fails. 1 Introduction2 Bell’s Theorem and Classical Probability Spaces 2.1 Bell’s derivation of the Bell inequalities 2.2 Pitowsky’s derivation of the Bell inequalities3 Incompatible Observables4 Generalized Probability Spaces5 A ‘No-Go’ Theorem6 Conclusions
There have been many discussions about whether all observational propositions in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics can be taken as simultaneously definite without contradiction. Von Neumann, Jauch and Piron, and Bell have shown that not all observational propositions in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics can be interpreted in this way. In the present paper, I examine these theorems from an operator algebraic point view in order to apply these theorems to algebraic quantum field theory. Then I point out that not all observational propositions in local algebras can be taken as definite, in addition to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.
Introduction To know the quantum mechanical state of a system implies, in general, only statistical restrictions on the results of measurements. It seems interesting to ask if this statistical element be thought of as arising, as in classical statistical mechanics, because the states in question are averages over better defined states for which individually the results would be quite determined. These hypothetical ‘dispersion free’ states would be specified not only by the quantum mechanical state vector but also by additional ‘hidden variables’ – ‘hidden’ because if states with prescribed values of these variables could actually be prepared, quantum mechanics would be observably inadequate. Whether this question is indeed interesting has been the subject of debate. The present paper does not contribute to that debate. It is addressed to those who do find the question interesting, and more particularly to those among them who believe that ‘the question concerning the existence of such hidden variables received an early and rather decisive answer in the form of von Neumann's proof on the mathematical impossibility of such variables in quantum theory.’ An attempt will be made to clarify what von Neumann and his successors actually demonstrated. This will cover, as well as von Neumann's treatment, the recent version of the argument by Jauch and Piron, and the stronger result consequent on the work of Gleason. It will be urged that these analyses leave the real question untouched.