Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0009103 · Physics Letters A

Reply to “Comment on: A quantum approach to static games of complete information”

Luca Marinatto, Tullio Weber

Published Nov 1, 2000• 24 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(00)00711-8

Related papers

Reply to "Comment on: A Quantum Approach to Static Games of Complete Information"

L. MARINATTO, WEBER, TULLIO

This is a reply to the paper by S.C.Benjamin, quant-ph/0008127.

•Jan 1, 2000•19 citations

Comment on “A quantum approach to static games of complete information”

Simon C. Benjamin

arXiv:quant-ph/0008127•Physics Letters A•Nov 1, 2000•41 citations

A quantum approach to static games of complete information

Luca Marinatto, Tullio Weber

arXiv:quant-ph/0004081•Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 2000•296 citations

Quantum and Classical Game Strategies

S. J. van Enk

A Comment on the Letter by David A. Meyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1052 (1999). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Physical Review Letters•Jan 24, 2000•35 citations

Reply to “Comments on quantization of Colonel Blotto game”

A. C. Maioli, M. H. M. Passos, W. F. Balthazar +3 more

Quantum Information Processing•Oct 1, 2020•0 citations

Underlining some limitations of the statistical formalism in quantum mechanics: Reply to the Comment of Bodor and Diósi

F. Fratini, Armen G. Hayrapetyan

In a paper of us, it is showed that Density Matrices do not provide a complete description of ensembles of states in quantum mechanics, since they lack measurable information concerning the preparation of the ensembles. Bodor and Diósi have later posted a comment on that article, which agrees on some points of it but disagrees on some others. This reply is intended to clarify the discussion.

arXiv:1204.1071•Apr 4, 2012•1 citation