Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0007035

Quantum deletion is possible via a partial randomization procedure

E. Elizalde

Published Jul 12, 2000• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

An alternative kind of deleting/erasing operation is introduced which differs from the commonly used {\it controlled-not} (C-not) conditional logical operation $-$to flip to a standard, `zero' value the (classical or quantum) state of the last copy in a chain, in a deletion process. It is completely reversible, in the classical case, possessing a most natural cloning operation counterpart. We call this deleting procedure R-deletion since, in a way, it can be viewed as a `randomization' of the standard C-not operator. It has the remarkable property of by-passing in a simple manner the `impossibility of deletion of a quantum state' principle, put forward by Pati and Braunstein recently \cite{pbn1}.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0007035

Related papers

No-deleting principle for two unitary copies

Dafa Li

Pati and Braunstein defined a deleting machine and showed the impossibility of deleting one of two identical copies of an unknown quantum state. So far, no one has defined two non-identical copies of a quantum state, of course no one has discussed the impossibility of deleting one of two non-identical copies of an unknown quantum state. In this paper, we define $u|ψ>$ and $U|ψ>$, where $u$ and $U$ are any unitary operators, as two unitary copies of a quantum state $|ψ>$, and show that it is impossible to delete one of two unitary copies of an unknown state.

quant-pharXiv:2606.24522•Jun 24, 2026•0 citations

Probabilistic Erasing of Quantum Information

Hongtao Zhang

According to the superposition principle of quantum states,an arbitrary quantum state can not be deterministically erased(Pati Braunstein),but may be probabilistically erased.Similar to the probabilistic cloning of quantum states by Duan Guo,in this paper a probabilistic erasing scheme is developed,i.e.,two non-orthogonal states secretly chosen from a certain set {|ψ 1〉,|ψ 2〉} can be probabilistically erased through a unitary transformation U in combination with a subsequent measurement M.The differences in characters and efficiencies between probabilistic cloning and erasing are discussed.

Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Some analogies between quantum cloning and quantum deleting

Daowen Qiu

We further verify the impossibility of deleting an arbitrary unknown quantum state, and also show it is impossible to delete two nonorthogonal quantum states as a consequence of unitarity of quantum mechanics. A quantum approximate (deterministic) deleting machine and a probabilistic (exact) deleting machine are constructed. The estimation for the global fidelity characterizing the efficiency of the quantum approximate deleting is given. We then demonstrate that unknown nonorthogonal states chosen from a set with their multiple copies can evolve into a linear superposition of multiple deletions and failure branches by a unitary process if and only if the states are linearly independent. It is notable that the proof for necessity is somewhat different from Pati's [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2849 (1999)]. Another deleting machine for the input states that are unnecessarily linearly independent is also presented. The bounds on the success probabilities of these deleting machines are derived. So we expound some preliminary analogies between quantum cloning and deleting.

Physical Review A•Apr 15, 2002•15 citations

Deleting and cloning of quantum information

Yongming Li

Using the reduced density operator of quantum state to study the deletion and clone of quantum information.Testify that there no exists quantum deleting machine which makes the deleted states and the blank states be correlated;also we can not construct a machine to perfectly delete arbitrary mixed quantum states.At last,we consider the problem of cloning and deleting of mixed quantum states in the case of probabilistic form,provide a sufficient and necessary condition in the form of probability with a unification formula.By using the results obtained,the processing of quantum information can be further comprehended and has aspiring significance for quantum computer.

Computer Engineering and Applications Journal•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Quantum Cloning and Deletion in Quantum Information Theory

Satyabrata Adhikari

Quantum mechanics put restriction on performing some task which we can do classically. One such restriction is that we cannot copy an arbitrary quantum state. This is known as No-cloning theorem. Although quantum mechanics forbid us to construct a perfect cloner, there is no restriction to construct an imperfect cloner. Therefore, we have constructed and studied a special kind of quantum cloning machine named as Hybrid quantum cloning machine which is nothing but a different combination of pre-existing quantum cloning machines. We showed that this hybrid quantum cloning machine sometime gives better quality copy than the pre-existing quantum cloners. Quantum entanglement is a very astonishing property in a multi-partite system and it is a very useful ingredient of quantum information theory. Therefore broadcasting (cloning) of entanglement is a very important subject to study. In this regard we have studied the broadcasting of entanglement using state dependent quantum cloning machine. Further, we have investigated the problem of secretly broadcasting of three-qubit entangled state between two distant partners. Linearity of quantum mechanics put another restriction on deletion of an arbitrary quantum state i.e. an arbitrary quantum state against a copy cannot be perfectly deleted. Like cloning machine one can construct an approximate deletion machine also. Therefore, we have constructed an universal deletion machine in the sense that the fidelity of deletion does not depend on the input state and showed that the fidelity of deletion is 3/4 . Further we showed that the fidelity of deletion depends on the blank state at the output and it can be improved from the value 3/4 for certain blank state. Moreover, we have studied the case where two cloned copies are given at the input of the deletion machine.

arXiv:0902.1622•Feb 10, 2009•2 citations

Quantum deletion: Beyond the no-deletion principle

Satyabrata Adhikari

Suppose we are given two identical copies of an unknown quantum state and we wish to delete one copy from among the given two copies. The quantum no-deletion principle restricts us from perfectly deleting a copy but it does not prohibit us from deleting a copy approximately. Here we construct two types of a ``universal quantum deletion machine'' which approximately deletes a copy such that the fidelity of deletion does not depend on the input state. The two types of universal quantum deletion machines are (1) a conventional deletion machine described by one unitary operator and (2) a modified deletion machine described by two unitary operators. Here it is shown that the modified deletion machine deletes a qubit with fidelity $3∕4$, which is the maximum limit for deleting an unknown quantum state. In addition to this we also show that the modified deletion machine retains the qubit in the first mode with average fidelity 0.77 (approx.) which is slightly greater than the fidelity of measurement for two given identical states, showing how precisely one can determine its state [S. Massar and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259 (1995)]. We also show that the deletion machine itself is input state independent, i.e., the information is not hidden in the deleting machine, and hence we can delete the information completely from the deletion machine.

arXiv:quant-ph/0510182•Physical Review A•Nov 18, 2005•14 citations
An alternative kind of deleting/erasing operation is introduced which differs from the commonly used {\it controlled-not} (C-not) conditional logical operation −-−to flip to a standard, zero' value the (classical or quantum) state of the last copy in a chain, in a deletion process. It is completely reversible, in the classical case, possessing a most natural cloning operation counterpart. We call this deleting procedure R-deletion since, in a way, it can be viewed as a randomization' of the standard C-not operator. It has the remarkable property of by-passing in a simple manner the `impossibility of deletion of a quantum state' principle, put forward by Pati and Braunstein recently \cite{pbn1}.
Pati and Braunstein defined a deleting machine and showed the impossibility of deleting one of two identical copies of an unknown quantum state. So far, no one has defined two non-identical copies of a quantum state, of course no one has discussed the impossibility of deleting one of two non-identical copies of an unknown quantum state. In this paper, we define u∣ψ>u|ψ>u∣ψ> and U∣ψ>U|ψ>U∣ψ>, where uuu and UUU are any unitary operators, as two unitary copies of a quantum state ∣ψ>|ψ>∣ψ>, and show that it is impossible to delete one of two unitary copies of an unknown state.
According to the superposition principle of quantum states,an arbitrary quantum state can not be deterministically erased(Pati Braunstein),but may be probabilistically erased.Similar to the probabilistic cloning of quantum states by Duan Guo,in this paper a probabilistic erasing scheme is developed,i.e.,two non-orthogonal states secretly chosen from a certain set {|ψ 1〉,|ψ 2〉} can be probabilistically erased through a unitary transformation U in combination with a subsequent measurement M.The differences in characters and efficiencies between probabilistic cloning and erasing are discussed.
We further verify the impossibility of deleting an arbitrary unknown quantum state, and also show it is impossible to delete two nonorthogonal quantum states as a consequence of unitarity of quantum mechanics. A quantum approximate (deterministic) deleting machine and a probabilistic (exact) deleting machine are constructed. The estimation for the global fidelity characterizing the efficiency of the quantum approximate deleting is given. We then demonstrate that unknown nonorthogonal states chosen from a set with their multiple copies can evolve into a linear superposition of multiple deletions and failure branches by a unitary process if and only if the states are linearly independent. It is notable that the proof for necessity is somewhat different from Pati's [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2849 (1999)]. Another deleting machine for the input states that are unnecessarily linearly independent is also presented. The bounds on the success probabilities of these deleting machines are derived. So we expound some preliminary analogies between quantum cloning and deleting.
Using the reduced density operator of quantum state to study the deletion and clone of quantum information.Testify that there no exists quantum deleting machine which makes the deleted states and the blank states be correlated;also we can not construct a machine to perfectly delete arbitrary mixed quantum states.At last,we consider the problem of cloning and deleting of mixed quantum states in the case of probabilistic form,provide a sufficient and necessary condition in the form of probability with a unification formula.By using the results obtained,the processing of quantum information can be further comprehended and has aspiring significance for quantum computer.
Quantum mechanics put restriction on performing some task which we can do classically. One such restriction is that we cannot copy an arbitrary quantum state. This is known as No-cloning theorem. Although quantum mechanics forbid us to construct a perfect cloner, there is no restriction to construct an imperfect cloner. Therefore, we have constructed and studied a special kind of quantum cloning machine named as Hybrid quantum cloning machine which is nothing but a different combination of pre-existing quantum cloning machines. We showed that this hybrid quantum cloning machine sometime gives better quality copy than the pre-existing quantum cloners. Quantum entanglement is a very astonishing property in a multi-partite system and it is a very useful ingredient of quantum information theory. Therefore broadcasting (cloning) of entanglement is a very important subject to study. In this regard we have studied the broadcasting of entanglement using state dependent quantum cloning machine. Further, we have investigated the problem of secretly broadcasting of three-qubit entangled state between two distant partners. Linearity of quantum mechanics put another restriction on deletion of an arbitrary quantum state i.e. an arbitrary quantum state against a copy cannot be perfectly deleted. Like cloning machine one can construct an approximate deletion machine also. Therefore, we have constructed an universal deletion machine in the sense that the fidelity of deletion does not depend on the input state and showed that the fidelity of deletion is 3/4 . Further we showed that the fidelity of deletion depends on the blank state at the output and it can be improved from the value 3/4 for certain blank state. Moreover, we have studied the case where two cloned copies are given at the input of the deletion machine.
Suppose we are given two identical copies of an unknown quantum state and we wish to delete one copy from among the given two copies. The quantum no-deletion principle restricts us from perfectly deleting a copy but it does not prohibit us from deleting a copy approximately. Here we construct two types of a ``universal quantum deletion machine'' which approximately deletes a copy such that the fidelity of deletion does not depend on the input state. The two types of universal quantum deletion machines are (1) a conventional deletion machine described by one unitary operator and (2) a modified deletion machine described by two unitary operators. Here it is shown that the modified deletion machine deletes a qubit with fidelity 3∕43∕43∕4, which is the maximum limit for deleting an unknown quantum state. In addition to this we also show that the modified deletion machine retains the qubit in the first mode with average fidelity 0.77 (approx.) which is slightly greater than the fidelity of measurement for two given identical states, showing how precisely one can determine its state [S. Massar and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259 (1995)]. We also show that the deletion machine itself is input state independent, i.e., the information is not hidden in the deleting machine, and hence we can delete the information completely from the deletion machine.