Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0007030

A reply to "Quantum Clock Synchronization"

Eric A. Burt, Chris Ekstrom, Swanson, Tom

Published Jul 11, 2000• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Recently a protocol for Quantum Clock Synchronization (QCS) of remote clocks using quantum entanglement was proposed by Jozsa et al. This method has the goal of eliminating the random noise present in classical synchronization techniques. However, as stated QCS depends on the two members of each entangled pair undergoing the same unitary evolution even while being transported to different locations. This is essentially equivalent to a perfect Eddington Slow Clock Transfer protocol and thus, not an improvement over classical techniques. We will discuss this and suggest ways in which QCS may still be used.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0007030

Related papers

Quantum Clock Synchronization Networks: A Survey

Uman Khalid, Muhammad Shohibul Ulum, Mujirin +3 more

Quantum clock synchronization (QCS) aims to establish a shared temporal reference between distant nodes by exploiting uniquely quantum phenomena such as entanglement, single-photon interference, and quantum correlations. In contrast to classical synchronization and time-transfer techniques, which are limited by signal propagation delays, atmospheric disturbances, and oscillator drift, QCS protocols offer the potential to surpass classical precision bounds and enhance resilience against adversarial manipulations. As precise and secure time synchronization underpins distributed quantum networks, navigation systems, and emerging quantum Internet infrastructures, understanding QCS principles, capabilities, and implementation challenges has become increasingly important. This survey provides a unified and critical overview of the rapidly growing QCS research landscape, highlighting fundamentals, protocol types, enabling resources, performance constraints, security considerations, and practical implementations of QCS. We first introduce the theoretical underpinnings of QCS, including entanglement-assisted time transfer, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference-based synchronization, and quantum slow-clock transport. We then categorize the main QCS protocols, ranging from ticking-qubit and entanglement-based schemes to time-of-arrival correlation methods, conveyor-belt synchronization, and quantum-enhanced two-way time transfer. This organization clarifies the relationships between protocol families and their achievable precision advantages over classical methods. Key quantum resources such as spontaneous parametric down-conversion-based entangled photon pairs, Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger and W multipartite states, squeezed and frequency-entangled light, quantum frequency combs, and quantum memories are reviewed in the context of scalability and robustness.

quant-pharXiv:2604.04437•Apr 7, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Clock Synchronization Networks: A Survey

Uman Khalid, Muhammad Shohibul Ulum, Mujirin +3 more

Quantum clock synchronization (QCS) aims to establish a shared temporal reference between distant nodes by exploiting uniquely quantum phenomena such as entanglement, single-photon interference, and quantum correlations. In contrast to classical synchronization and time-transfer techniques, which are limited by signal propagation delays, atmospheric disturbances, and oscillator drift, QCS protocols offer the potential to surpass classical precision bounds and enhance resilience against adversarial manipulations. As precise and secure time synchronization underpins distributed quantum networks, navigation systems, and emerging quantum Internet infrastructures, understanding QCS principles, capabilities, and implementation challenges has become increasingly important. This survey provides a unified and critical overview of the rapidly growing QCS research landscape, highlighting fundamentals, protocol types, enabling resources, performance constraints, security considerations, and practical implementations of QCS. We first introduce the theoretical underpinnings of QCS, including entanglement-assisted time transfer, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference-based synchronization, and quantum slow-clock transport. We then categorize the main QCS protocols, ranging from ticking-qubit and entanglement-based schemes to time-of-arrival correlation methods, conveyor-belt synchronization, and quantum-enhanced two-way time transfer. This organization clarifies the relationships between protocol families and their achievable precision advantages over classical methods. Key quantum resources such as spontaneous parametric down-conversion-based entangled photon pairs, Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger and W multipartite states, squeezed and frequency-entangled light, quantum frequency combs, and quantum memories are reviewed in the context of scalability and robustness. Practical limitations arising from decoherence, channel loss, dispersion, detector timing jitter, and relativistic effects are examined alongside emerging noise mitigation strategies. Security aspects—including eavesdropping on time correlations, intercept-resend attacks, and adversarial delay manipulation—are evaluated with respect to trusted and untrusted network architectures. Recent proof-of-concept demonstrations in fiber networks, free-space optical links, chip-integrated photonic systems, and satellite-ground platforms are summarized, followed by discussions of open challenges toward precise and secure global quantum-synchronized networks.

IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials•Jan 1, 2026•1 citation

Lorentz-invariant look at quantum clock-synchronization protocols based on distributed entanglement

Ulvi Yurtsever, Jonathan P. Dowling

Recent work has raised the possibility that quantum-information-theory techniques can be used to synchronize atomic clocks nonlocally. One of the proposed algorithms for quantum clock synchronization (QCS) requires distribution of entangled pure singlets to the synchronizing parties [R. Jozsa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. $85$ 2010 (2000)]. Such remote entanglement distribution normally creates a relative phase error in the distributed singlet state, which then needs to be purified asynchronously. We present a relativistic analysis of the QCS protocol that shows that asynchronous entanglement purification is not possible, and, therefore, the proposed QCS scheme remains incomplete. We discuss possible directions of research in quantum-information theory, which may lead to a complete, working QCS protocol.

arXiv:quant-ph/0010097•Physical Review A•May 6, 2002•49 citations

Implementation of Multiparty quantum clock synchronization

Xiangyu Kong, Xin, Tao, Shijie Wei +4 more

The quantum clock synchronization (QCS) is to measure the time difference among the spatially separated clocks with the principle of quantum mechanics. The first QCS algorithm proposed by Chuang and Jozsa is merely based on two parties, which is further extended and generalized to the multiparty situation by Krco and Paul. They present a multiparty QCS protocol based upon W states that utilizes shared prior entanglement and broadcast of classical information to synchronize spatially separated clocks. Shortly afterwards, Ben-Av and Exman came up with an optimized multiparty QCS using Z state. In this work, we firstly report an implementation of Krco and Ben-AV multiparty QCS algorithm using a four-qubit Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). The experimental results show a great agreement with the theory and also prove Ben-AV multiparty QCS algorithm more accurate than Krco.

arXiv:1708.06050•Aug 21, 2017•1 citation

Remote quantum clock synchronization without synchronized clocks

Ebubechukwu O. Ilo-Okeke, Louis Tessler, Jonathan P. Dowling +1 more

Abstract A major outstanding problem for many quantum clock synchronization protocols is the hidden assumption of a common phase reference between the parties to be synchronized. In general, the definition of the quantum states between two parties do not have consistent phase definitions, which can lead to an unknown systematic error. We show that despite prior arguments to the contrary, it is possible to remove this unknown phase via entanglement purification. This closes the loophole for entanglement based quantum clock synchronization protocols, which is a non-local approach to synchronize two clocks independent of the properties of the intervening medium. Starting with noisy Bell pairs, we show that the scheme produces a singlet state for any combination of (i) differing basis conventions for Alice and Bob; (ii) an overall time offset in the execution of the purification algorithm; and (iii) the presence of a noisy channel. Error estimates reveal that better performance than existing classical Einstein synchronization protocols should be achievable using current technology.

arXiv:1709.08423•npj Quantum Information•Aug 9, 2018•78 citations

On decoherence in quantum clock synchronization

Sergio Boixo, Carlton M. Caves, Animesh Datta +1 more

We study two quantum versions of the Eddington clock-synchronization protocol in the presence of decoherence. The first protocol uses maximally entangled states to achieve the Heisenberg limit for clock synchronization. The second protocol achieves the limit without using entanglement. We show the equivalence of the two protocols under any single-qubit decoherence model that does not itself provide synchronization information.

arXiv:quant-ph/0605013•Laser Physics•Oct 30, 2006•19 citations
Recently a protocol for Quantum Clock Synchronization (QCS) of remote clocks using quantum entanglement was proposed by Jozsa et al. This method has the goal of eliminating the random noise present in classical synchronization techniques. However, as stated QCS depends on the two members of each entangled pair undergoing the same unitary evolution even while being transported to different locations. This is essentially equivalent to a perfect Eddington Slow Clock Transfer protocol and thus, not an improvement over classical techniques. We will discuss this and suggest ways in which QCS may still be used.
Quantum clock synchronization (QCS) aims to establish a shared temporal reference between distant nodes by exploiting uniquely quantum phenomena such as entanglement, single-photon interference, and quantum correlations. In contrast to classical synchronization and time-transfer techniques, which are limited by signal propagation delays, atmospheric disturbances, and oscillator drift, QCS protocols offer the potential to surpass classical precision bounds and enhance resilience against adversarial manipulations. As precise and secure time synchronization underpins distributed quantum networks, navigation systems, and emerging quantum Internet infrastructures, understanding QCS principles, capabilities, and implementation challenges has become increasingly important. This survey provides a unified and critical overview of the rapidly growing QCS research landscape, highlighting fundamentals, protocol types, enabling resources, performance constraints, security considerations, and practical implementations of QCS. We first introduce the theoretical underpinnings of QCS, including entanglement-assisted time transfer, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference-based synchronization, and quantum slow-clock transport. We then categorize the main QCS protocols, ranging from ticking-qubit and entanglement-based schemes to time-of-arrival correlation methods, conveyor-belt synchronization, and quantum-enhanced two-way time transfer. This organization clarifies the relationships between protocol families and their achievable precision advantages over classical methods. Key quantum resources such as spontaneous parametric down-conversion-based entangled photon pairs, Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger and W multipartite states, squeezed and frequency-entangled light, quantum frequency combs, and quantum memories are reviewed in the context of scalability and robustness.
Quantum clock synchronization (QCS) aims to establish a shared temporal reference between distant nodes by exploiting uniquely quantum phenomena such as entanglement, single-photon interference, and quantum correlations. In contrast to classical synchronization and time-transfer techniques, which are limited by signal propagation delays, atmospheric disturbances, and oscillator drift, QCS protocols offer the potential to surpass classical precision bounds and enhance resilience against adversarial manipulations. As precise and secure time synchronization underpins distributed quantum networks, navigation systems, and emerging quantum Internet infrastructures, understanding QCS principles, capabilities, and implementation challenges has become increasingly important. This survey provides a unified and critical overview of the rapidly growing QCS research landscape, highlighting fundamentals, protocol types, enabling resources, performance constraints, security considerations, and practical implementations of QCS. We first introduce the theoretical underpinnings of QCS, including entanglement-assisted time transfer, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference-based synchronization, and quantum slow-clock transport. We then categorize the main QCS protocols, ranging from ticking-qubit and entanglement-based schemes to time-of-arrival correlation methods, conveyor-belt synchronization, and quantum-enhanced two-way time transfer. This organization clarifies the relationships between protocol families and their achievable precision advantages over classical methods. Key quantum resources such as spontaneous parametric down-conversion-based entangled photon pairs, Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger and W multipartite states, squeezed and frequency-entangled light, quantum frequency combs, and quantum memories are reviewed in the context of scalability and robustness. Practical limitations arising from decoherence, channel loss, dispersion, detector timing jitter, and relativistic effects are examined alongside emerging noise mitigation strategies. Security aspects—including eavesdropping on time correlations, intercept-resend attacks, and adversarial delay manipulation—are evaluated with respect to trusted and untrusted network architectures. Recent proof-of-concept demonstrations in fiber networks, free-space optical links, chip-integrated photonic systems, and satellite-ground platforms are summarized, followed by discussions of open challenges toward precise and secure global quantum-synchronized networks.
Recent work has raised the possibility that quantum-information-theory techniques can be used to synchronize atomic clocks nonlocally. One of the proposed algorithms for quantum clock synchronization (QCS) requires distribution of entangled pure singlets to the synchronizing parties [R. Jozsa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 858585 2010 (2000)]. Such remote entanglement distribution normally creates a relative phase error in the distributed singlet state, which then needs to be purified asynchronously. We present a relativistic analysis of the QCS protocol that shows that asynchronous entanglement purification is not possible, and, therefore, the proposed QCS scheme remains incomplete. We discuss possible directions of research in quantum-information theory, which may lead to a complete, working QCS protocol.
The quantum clock synchronization (QCS) is to measure the time difference among the spatially separated clocks with the principle of quantum mechanics. The first QCS algorithm proposed by Chuang and Jozsa is merely based on two parties, which is further extended and generalized to the multiparty situation by Krco and Paul. They present a multiparty QCS protocol based upon W states that utilizes shared prior entanglement and broadcast of classical information to synchronize spatially separated clocks. Shortly afterwards, Ben-Av and Exman came up with an optimized multiparty QCS using Z state. In this work, we firstly report an implementation of Krco and Ben-AV multiparty QCS algorithm using a four-qubit Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). The experimental results show a great agreement with the theory and also prove Ben-AV multiparty QCS algorithm more accurate than Krco.
Abstract A major outstanding problem for many quantum clock synchronization protocols is the hidden assumption of a common phase reference between the parties to be synchronized. In general, the definition of the quantum states between two parties do not have consistent phase definitions, which can lead to an unknown systematic error. We show that despite prior arguments to the contrary, it is possible to remove this unknown phase via entanglement purification. This closes the loophole for entanglement based quantum clock synchronization protocols, which is a non-local approach to synchronize two clocks independent of the properties of the intervening medium. Starting with noisy Bell pairs, we show that the scheme produces a singlet state for any combination of (i) differing basis conventions for Alice and Bob; (ii) an overall time offset in the execution of the purification algorithm; and (iii) the presence of a noisy channel. Error estimates reveal that better performance than existing classical Einstein synchronization protocols should be achievable using current technology.