Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0004023

On the compatibility between the Markov property and the quantum jump

Salgado, D., J. L. Sánchez‐Gómez

Published Apr 5, 2000• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A brief analysis of the compatibility between the quantum jump and the Markov property for quantum systems described by a stochastic evolution scheme is presented.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0004023

Related papers

QSES's and the Quantum Jump

D. Salgado, J. L. Sánchez-gómez

The stochastic methods in Hilbert space have been used both from a fundamental and a practical point of view. The result we report here concerns only the idea of applying these methods to model the evolution of quantum systems and does not enter into the question of their fundamental or practical status. It can be easily stated as follows: Once a quantum stochastic evolution scheme is assumed, the incompatibility between the Markov property and the notion of quantum jump is rapidly established.

•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

QSES's and the Quantum Jump

David Salgado, José Luis Sánchez-Gómez

Abstract The stochastic methods in Hilbert space have been used both from a fundamental and a practical point of view. The result reported here concerns the application of these methods to model the evolution of quantum systems and does not enter into the question of their fundamental or practical status. It can easily be stated as follows: Once a quantum stochastic evolution scheme is assumed, the incompatibility of the Markov property with the notion of quantum jumps is easily established

arXiv:quant-ph/0106116•Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Feb 1, 2001•0 citations

Comment on ‘‘Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process’’

Piotr Garbaczewski, Robert Olkiewicz

In the paper with the above-noted title, D. T. Gillespie [Phys. Rev. A 49, 1607 (1994)] claims that the theory of Markov stochastic processes cannot provide an adequate mathematical framework for quantum mechanics. In conjunction with the specific quantum dynamics considered there, we give a general analysis of the associated dichotomic jump processes. If we assume that Gillespie's ``measurement probabilities'' are the transition probabilities of a stochastic process, then the process must have an invariant (time independent) probability measure. Alternatively, if we demand the probability measure of the process follow the quantally implemented (via the Born statistical postulate) evolution, then we arrive at the jump process which can be interpreted as a Markov process if restricted to a suitable duration time. However, there is no corresponding Markov process consistent with the ${\mathit{Z}}_{2}$ event space assumption, if we require its existence for all times t\ensuremath{\in}${\mathbf{R}}_{+}$. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

arXiv:quant-ph/9601016•Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1996•4 citations

Can quantum Brownian motion be Markovian?

Hermann Grabert

Chemical Physics•Sep 29, 2005•27 citations

Evolution of Quantum Correlations for Jump-Type Quantum Stochastic Dynamics

Slawomir Marcin Koziel, W. A. Majewski

Acta Physica Polonica B•Apr 1, 2002•1 citation

Diffusion approximation of stochastic master equations with jumps

Clément Pellegrini, F. Petruccione

In the presence of quantum measurements with direct photon detection, the evolution of open quantum systems is usually described by stochastic master equations with jumps. Heuristically, diffusion models can be obtained from these equations as an approximation. A condition for a general diffusion approximation for jump master equations is presented. This approximation is rigorously proved by using techniques for Markov processes, which are based on the convergence of Markov generators and martingale problems. This result is illustrated by rigorously obtaining the diffusion approximation for homodyne and heterodyne detection.

arXiv:0907.3996•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 2009•8 citations
In the paper with the above-noted title, D. T. Gillespie [Phys. Rev. A 49, 1607 (1994)] claims that the theory of Markov stochastic processes cannot provide an adequate mathematical framework for quantum mechanics. In conjunction with the specific quantum dynamics considered there, we give a general analysis of the associated dichotomic jump processes. If we assume that Gillespie's ``measurement probabilities'' are the transition probabilities of a stochastic process, then the process must have an invariant (time independent) probability measure. Alternatively, if we demand the probability measure of the process follow the quantally implemented (via the Born statistical postulate) evolution, then we arrive at the jump process which can be interpreted as a Markov process if restricted to a suitable duration time. However, there is no corresponding Markov process consistent with the Z2{\mathit{Z}}_{2}Z2​ event space assumption, if we require its existence for all times t\ensuremath{\in}R+{\mathbf{R}}_{+}R+​. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
In the presence of quantum measurements with direct photon detection, the evolution of open quantum systems is usually described by stochastic master equations with jumps. Heuristically, diffusion models can be obtained from these equations as an approximation. A condition for a general diffusion approximation for jump master equations is presented. This approximation is rigorously proved by using techniques for Markov processes, which are based on the convergence of Markov generators and martingale problems. This result is illustrated by rigorously obtaining the diffusion approximation for homodyne and heterodyne detection.