arXiv:quant-ph/0002084

Decoherence and Planck's Radiation Law

Italo Vecchi

Published Feb 27, 2000• 0 citations

Abstract

The foundations of environment-induced decoherence theory are discussed and the role of unphysical assumptions is pointed out. An alternative interpretation of decoherence is proposed.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0002084

Related papers

Frequently Asked Questions about Decoherence

Charis Anastopoulos

We give a short, critical review of the issue of decoherence. We establish the most general framework in which decoherence can be discussed, how it can be quantified and how it can be measured. We focus on environment induced decoherence and its degree of usefulness for the interpretation of quantum theory. We finally discuss the emergence of a classical world. An overall emphasis is given in pointing at common fallacies and misconceptions.

arXiv:quant-ph/0011123Nov 30, 20007 citations

Hidden assumptions in decoherence theory

Italo Vecchi

The role of implicit assumptions in current decoherence theory is pointed out and clarified.

arXiv:quant-ph/0001021Jan 9, 20000 citations

Einstein's part in the development of quantum concepts

M A El'yashevich

Einstein's papers on quantum theory over the period 1905-1925 are reviewed. These papers played a fundamental role in the development of quantum concepts. This review traces the relationship between these papers, on the one hand, and Wien's and Planck's theoretical work on thermal radiation and Einstein's own work on statistical thermodynamics, on the other. Einstein's 1905 development of the concept of light quanta from Wien's radiation law, the application of this concept to elementary interactions of radiation with matter, Einstein's 1906–1907 analysis of the Planck radiation law, and Einstein's development of the foundations of a quantum theory of specific heat are all discussed. Particular attention is paid to Einstein's 1909 development of the concept of a particle-wave duality for radiation from a study of the energy and momentum fluctuations in a radiation field. Einstein's 1916 papers on the quantum theory of radiation are analyzed, and it is emphasized that Einstein was the first to suggest a probabilistic interpretation of the particle-wave duality, in addition to introducing coefficients to characterize the probabilities for optical transitions and offering his well-known derivation of the Planck radiation law. There is a special discussion of Einstein's expression, in his 1925 paper on the quantum theory of monatomic ideal gases, of high regard for de Broglie's concept of a particle-wave duality for material particles.

Soviet Physics UspekhiJul 31, 19794 citations

Environment-induced decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical

Wojciech Hubert Zurek

We study dynamics of quantum open systems, paying special attention to these aspects of their evolution which are relevant to the transition from quantum to classical. We begin with a discussion of the conditional dynamics of simple systems. The resulting models are straightforward but suffice to illustrate basic physical ideas behind quantum measurements and decoherence. To discuss decoherence and environment-induced superselection (einselection) in a more general setting, we sketch perturbative as well as exact derivations of several master equations valid for various systems. Using these equations we study einselection employing the general strategy of the predictability sieve. Assumptions that are usually made in the discussion of decoherence are critically reexamined along with the “standard lore” to which they lead. Restoration of quantum-classical correspondence in systems that are classically chaotic is discussed. The dynamical second law - it is shown - can be traced to the same phenomena that allow for the restoration of the correspondence principle in decohering chaotic systems (where it is otherwise lost on a very short time-scale). Quantum error correction is discussed as an example of an anti-decoherence strategy. Implications of decoherence and einselection for the interpretation of quantum theory are briefly pointed out.

Jan 1, 19920 citations

Planck's radiation law: is a quantum-classical perspective possible?

Michele Marrocco

Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyMay 24, 20160 citations

Reconstructing Reality: Environment-Induced Decoherence, the Measurement Problem, and the Emergence of Definiteness in Quantum Mechanics

Hanneke Janssen

This work is a critique of the program of "environment-induced decoherence" as advocated by Zurek, Zeh and Joos, among others. In particular, the alleged relevance of decoherence for a solution of the "measurement problem" is subjected to a detailed philosophical analysis. In the first chapter, an attempt is made to unravel what exactly this "measurement problem" amounts to for the decoherence theorists. The second chapter reviews the standard decoherence literature. The third chapter starts with a brief discussion of the philosophical implications of the decoherence program, followed by a non-standard reconstruction of the decoherence argument that aims to uncover some (mostly hidden) assumptions underlying the approach. It is argued that different subsets of these assumptions result in different versions of the decoherence argument. Next, these assumptions are investigated in more detail, and a number of open problems for the decoherence approach is formulated, in addition to the well-known "problem of outcomes". These problems concern the interpretational relevance of the preferred basis, the role and status of the ignorance interpretation of mixed states, imperfect decoherence and the role of the environment and the definition of subsystems. The fourth chapter addresses the question to what extent the embedding of decoherence in an Everett-like interpretational framework, such as Zurek's "existentional interpretation" and Wallace's structural-realistic version of the many-worlds interpretation, helps to resolve these problems. The main conclusions are formulated in the fifth chapter. Namely: 1) decoherence cannot address the "preferred-basis problem" without adding new interpretational axioms to the standard formalism, 2) the the locality principle (that says that the environment is the "irrelevant" part and should therefore be ignored) is not only problematic but also interpretationally superfluous, 3) the decoherence approach, when formulated in terms of the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics, is predicated on a solution of the "problem of outcomes" and thus cannot claim to account (even partially) for the latter, and 4) that the results of the decoherence program do not increase the plausibility of a realist interpretation of the quantum state.

Aug 1, 200813 citations