Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:physics/0507142

Hidden Time at Work: Simple Interference, Delayed Choice, Entanglement

Pavel Vyacheslavovich Kurakin

Published Jul 19, 2005• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Previously we presented general formulation of hidden time concept as a basis for building a dynamical picture underlying quantum mechanics. Here, we present detailed explanation of how hidden time works for basic quantum optical experiments, to make hidden time concept visually concievable and open for criticism.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.physics/0507142

Related papers

A time-energy delayed-choice interference experiment for the undergraduate laboratory

Jhonny Castrillón, Enrique J. Galvez, Boris A. Rodríguez +1 more

Abstract Laboratory experiments that illustrate the fundamentals of quantum physics are powerful teaching instruments because they re-enact thought experiments, allowing students to think deeper about the quantum-mechanical principles involved. Interference, wave–particle duality and entanglement are among the most important predictions of quantum mechanics. They are abstract and counter-intuitive. More recent concepts that help illustrate these subtleties include quantum erasure and delayed choice. In this article we present an experiment for the undergraduate laboratory that involves all of these issues or concepts. The experiment entails only minor modifications to a well-known setup for doing single-photon interference. In this article we present the experiment, its results and a theoretical description.

European Journal of Physics•Jun 19, 2019•10 citations

Demystifying the Delayed Choice Experiments

Bram Gaasbeek

The delayed choice experiments are a collection of experiments where the counterintuitive laws of quantum mechanics are manifested in a very striking way. Although the delayed choice experiments can be very accurately described with the standard framework of quantum optics, a more didactical and intuitive explanation seems not to have been given so far. In this note, we fill that gap.

arXiv:1007.3977•Jul 22, 2010•8 citations

A single hidden variable interpretation of the quantum wave function

David Gentile

An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not correlated with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-measurements” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “measure” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from an inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an “observer” inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.

Qeios•Oct 23, 2023•0 citations

A single hidden variable interpretation of the quantum wave function

David Gentile

An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not correlated with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-observations” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “observe” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from an inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an observer inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.

Qeios•Oct 2, 2023•1 citation

A single hidden variable interpretation of the quantum wave function

David Gentile

An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not correlated with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-measurements” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “measure” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from an inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an “observer” inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.

Qeios•Apr 25, 2024•0 citations

Projection Evolution of Quantum States—the Delayed Choice Puzzle

Marek Góźdź, ANDRZEJ GÓŹDŹ, Alexander A. Gusev +1 more

We discuss the problem of the time variable in the nearly standard formulation of the quantum mechanics. In order to be able to describe the outcome of some of the experiments, we have used a novel formulation of the time evolution of quantum states called the projection evolution. As an example a delayed-choice experiment is described. We show that this description recreates the experimental results without relaying on the spatial parts of the wave functions.

Physics of Atomic Nuclei•Nov 1, 2018•1 citation
Abstract Laboratory experiments that illustrate the fundamentals of quantum physics are powerful teaching instruments because they re-enact thought experiments, allowing students to think deeper about the quantum-mechanical principles involved. Interference, wave–particle duality and entanglement are among the most important predictions of quantum mechanics. They are abstract and counter-intuitive. More recent concepts that help illustrate these subtleties include quantum erasure and delayed choice. In this article we present an experiment for the undergraduate laboratory that involves all of these issues or concepts. The experiment entails only minor modifications to a well-known setup for doing single-photon interference. In this article we present the experiment, its results and a theoretical description.
An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not correlated with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-measurements” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “measure” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from an inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an “observer” inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.
An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not correlated with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-observations” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “observe” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from an inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an observer inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.
An interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented in which there is one hidden variable. While this number of hidden variables is insufficient to explain Bell nonlocality, it can help solve the measurement problem. It also provides an explanation of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that is more intuitive than current explanations. In addition, a theory of nonlocality emerges directly from its assumptions. The key idea is that from the perspective of an outside observer, not correlated with an observed system, we treat all interactions within the system as unitary. However, from the perspective of an “observer” inside the system, we treat all new entanglements as “micro-measurements” and as a projection onto some basis of measurement. One particle can “measure” another. Thus, particles will have a defined value on one measurement basis from an inside perspective. This means that the wave function, from the outside view, will at times describe an objective uncertainty, at other times a subjective uncertainty and at yet other times a combination of both. The standard wave function describes the total uncertainty, the minimal uncertainty that is present for any observer outside of the system, while for an “observer” inside the system, only the objective part of the uncertainty remains, and this can be described by an inner wave function. The hidden variable is invisible to the outside observer.