Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:physics/0210115

Information Transfer Time: The Role of Holomorphism, Stationary Phase, and Noise

Michael Charles Parker, Stuart D. Walker

Published Oct 28, 2002• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper we present an analysis of information transfer time based on holomorphism, causality and the classical principle of stationary phase. We also make a preliminary study of the effect of noise on information transfer time, and find that noise tends to increase transfer times. Noise and information signals are both essentially acausal, such that analytic continuation (i.e. prediction) is impossible, which also implies that their frequency spectra cannot be holomorphic. This leads to the paradox of a non-holomorphic information-bearing light signal, yet whose underlying Maxwell equations governing the propagation of the EM wave describe a holomorphic function in spacetime. We find that application of stationary phase and entropy arguments circumvents this difficulty, with stationary phase only suggesting the most likely transfer times of an information signal in the presence of noise. Faster transit times are not excluded, but are highly improbable. Stationary phase solutions, by definition, do not include signal forerunners, whose detection in the presence of noise is also unreliable. Hence a finite information capacity ensues, as expected from Shannon's law, and information cannot be transferred faster than c. We also find that the method of stationary phase implies complex transfer times. However, by considering spacetime to be isomorphic with the complex temporal plane, we find that an imaginary time is equivalent to a real distance, and can be interpreted as the uncertainty in the spatial position of the information pulse. Finally, we apply our theory to a photonic band gap crystal, and find that information transfer speed and tunneling is always subluminal.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.physics/0210115

Related papers

THE STATIONARY PHASE CONDITION APPLICABILITY TO THE STUDY OF TUNNEL EFFECT

A. E. BERNARDINI

Some recent theoretical studies tended to employ analytically-continuous gaussian, or infinite-bandwidth step pulses to examine tunneling process. The stationary phase method is often employed to this aim. However, gaussian functions do not have a well-defined front, such that their speed of propagation becomes ambiguous. Also, infinite bandwidth signals cannot propagate through any real physical medium (whose transfer function is therefore finite) without pulse distortion, which also leads to ambiguities in determining propagation velocity during the tunneling process. In this manuscript, we appoint some incompatibilities with the application of the method of stationary phase in deriving tunneling times which, eventually, can ruin the superluminal interpretation of transition times.

arXiv:quant-ph/0510065•Modern Physics Letters B•Aug 10, 2005•1 citation

The stationary phase condition applicability to the study of tunnel effect

Alex E. Bernardini

Some recent theoretical studies have tended to employ analytically-continuous {\\em gaussian}, or infinite-bandwidth step pulses to examine tunneling process. The stationary phase method is often employed to this aim. However, {\\em gaussian} functions do not have a well-defined front, such that their speed of propagation becomes ambiguous. Also, infinite bandwidth signals cannot propagate through any real physical medium (whose transfer function is therefore finite) without pulse distortion, which also leads to ambiguities in determining propagation velocity during the tunneling process. In this manuscript, we appoint some incompatibilities with the application of the method of stationary phase in deriving tunneling times which, eventually, can ruin the {\\em superluminal} interpretation of transition times.

•Oct 10, 2005•2 citations

Fast Light and the Speed of Information Transfer in the Presence of Detector Noise

M.Z. Feng, Wayne V. Sorin, R.S. Tucker

The phenomenon of fast-light pulse propagation has seen renewed interest in recent years, but its relationship to thespeed of information transferis still being debated. In this paper, we define thespeed of information transferas the propagation speed of a point of constant signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the leading edge of a signal pulse. We use standard telecommunication analysis to include the effects of noise so that the bit-error rate (BER) can be calculated as a function of a variable decision time. We introduce the concept of a time-dependent Q-factor so that pulse arrival times can be compared at equivalent BERs. We show that when receiver noise is included in a gain-assisted fast-light system, the measuredspeed of information transfercan exceed the speed of light for an equivalent pulse travelling through a vacuum.

IEEE photonics journal•Sep 1, 2009•7 citations

Velocity of detectable information in faster-than-light pulses

Ahmed H. Dorrah, Mo Mojahedi

The velocity of detectable information (signal velocity) in a medium capable of supporting abnormal (superluminal or negative) group velocities is calculated. This is carried out by tracking the time instant at which the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the detector output reaches a predetermined threshold while considering the total classical and quantum noise of the channel in addition to the detector noise. Furthermore, the method of steepest descent is incorporated to systematically study various forms of pulse reshaping associated with superluminal propagation and its effect on SNR. By studying the behavior of SNR as a function of both space and time, the present analysis predicts the existence of a cutoff distance beyond which signal velocity of a superluminal pulse is delayed as compared to a companion pulse traveling the same distance in vacuum. Finally, the interplay between the relative strength of the medium-generated noise and the detector noise and its effect on signal velocity is discussed.

Physical Review A•Sep 16, 2014•7 citations

Physical mechanism and information velocity of fast light: A time-domain analysis

Zhenshan S. Yang

We study the physical mechanism and the information velocity of fast light based on the time-domain propagator governing light propagation in a dispersive system. We show that the output pulse can be regarded as the superposition of multiple ``copies'' of the input pulse, each traveling at a well-defined signal velocity no greater than the speed of light in vacuum, and the interference between the front edges of these copies generates the peak of the output pulse. The information velocity is defined as the ratio of the propagation distance to the mini-mum time required to complete any given information transfer process, directly reflecting how fast the signal of interest, i.e., the part of the pulse that carries the information of interest, propagates. With the peak of the output pulse representing the information, as is typical in slow- and fast-light applications, we find that the information velocity is significantly smaller than the speed of a discontinuity in the pulse, which was traditionally proposed to be the signal velocity of fast light. The analysis can also be applied to slow-light propagation.

Physical Review A•Feb 4, 2013•12 citations

Nonlocal Quantum Information Transfer Without Superluminal Signalling and Communication

Jan Walleczek, Gerhard Grössing

It is a frequent assumption that—via superluminal information transfers—superluminal signals capable of enabling communication are necessarily exchanged in any quantum theory that posits hidden superluminal influences. However, does the presence of hidden superluminal influences automatically imply superluminal signalling and communication? The non-signalling theorem mediates the apparent conflict between quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity. However, as a ‘no-go’ theorem there exist two opposing interpretations of the non-signalling constraint: foundational and operational. Concerning Bell’s theorem, we argue that Bell employed both interpretations, and that he finally adopted the operational position which is associated often with ontological quantum theory, e.g., de Broglie–Bohm theory. This position we refer to as “effective non-signalling”. By contrast, associated with orthodox quantum mechanics is the foundational position referred to here as “axiomatic non-signalling”. In search of a decisive communication-theoretic criterion for differentiating between “axiomatic” and “effective” non-signalling, we employ the operational framework offered by Shannon’s mathematical theory of communication, whereby we distinguish between Shannon signals and non-Shannon signals. We find that an effective non-signalling theorem represents two sub-theorems: (1) Non-transfer-control (NTC) theorem, and (2) Non-signification-control (NSC) theorem. Employing NTC and NSC theorems, we report that effective, instead of axiomatic, non-signalling is entirely sufficient for prohibiting nonlocal communication. Effective non-signalling prevents the instantaneous, i.e., superluminal, transfer of message-encoded information through the controlled use—by a sender-receiver pair —of informationally-correlated detection events, e.g., in EPR-type experiments. An effective non-signalling theorem allows for nonlocal quantum information transfer yet—at the same time—effectively denies superluminal signalling and communication.

arXiv:1501.07177•Foundations of Physics•Jan 29, 2016•17 citations
In this paper we present an analysis of information transfer time based on holomorphism, causality and the classical principle of stationary phase. We also make a preliminary study of the effect of noise on information transfer time, and find that noise tends to increase transfer times. Noise and information signals are both essentially acausal, such that analytic continuation (i.e. prediction) is impossible, which also implies that their frequency spectra cannot be holomorphic. This leads to the paradox of a non-holomorphic information-bearing light signal, yet whose underlying Maxwell equations governing the propagation of the EM wave describe a holomorphic function in spacetime. We find that application of stationary phase and entropy arguments circumvents this difficulty, with stationary phase only suggesting the most likely transfer times of an information signal in the presence of noise. Faster transit times are not excluded, but are highly improbable. Stationary phase solutions, by definition, do not include signal forerunners, whose detection in the presence of noise is also unreliable. Hence a finite information capacity ensues, as expected from Shannon's law, and information cannot be transferred faster than c. We also find that the method of stationary phase implies complex transfer times. However, by considering spacetime to be isomorphic with the complex temporal plane, we find that an imaginary time is equivalent to a real distance, and can be interpreted as the uncertainty in the spatial position of the information pulse. Finally, we apply our theory to a photonic band gap crystal, and find that information transfer speed and tunneling is always subluminal.
Some recent theoretical studies tended to employ analytically-continuous gaussian, or infinite-bandwidth step pulses to examine tunneling process. The stationary phase method is often employed to this aim. However, gaussian functions do not have a well-defined front, such that their speed of propagation becomes ambiguous. Also, infinite bandwidth signals cannot propagate through any real physical medium (whose transfer function is therefore finite) without pulse distortion, which also leads to ambiguities in determining propagation velocity during the tunneling process. In this manuscript, we appoint some incompatibilities with the application of the method of stationary phase in deriving tunneling times which, eventually, can ruin the superluminal interpretation of transition times.
Some recent theoretical studies have tended to employ analytically-continuous {\\em gaussian}, or infinite-bandwidth step pulses to examine tunneling process. The stationary phase method is often employed to this aim. However, {\\em gaussian} functions do not have a well-defined front, such that their speed of propagation becomes ambiguous. Also, infinite bandwidth signals cannot propagate through any real physical medium (whose transfer function is therefore finite) without pulse distortion, which also leads to ambiguities in determining propagation velocity during the tunneling process. In this manuscript, we appoint some incompatibilities with the application of the method of stationary phase in deriving tunneling times which, eventually, can ruin the {\\em superluminal} interpretation of transition times.
The phenomenon of fast-light pulse propagation has seen renewed interest in recent years, but its relationship to thespeed of information transferis still being debated. In this paper, we define thespeed of information transferas the propagation speed of a point of constant signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the leading edge of a signal pulse. We use standard telecommunication analysis to include the effects of noise so that the bit-error rate (BER) can be calculated as a function of a variable decision time. We introduce the concept of a time-dependent Q-factor so that pulse arrival times can be compared at equivalent BERs. We show that when receiver noise is included in a gain-assisted fast-light system, the measuredspeed of information transfercan exceed the speed of light for an equivalent pulse travelling through a vacuum.
The velocity of detectable information (signal velocity) in a medium capable of supporting abnormal (superluminal or negative) group velocities is calculated. This is carried out by tracking the time instant at which the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the detector output reaches a predetermined threshold while considering the total classical and quantum noise of the channel in addition to the detector noise. Furthermore, the method of steepest descent is incorporated to systematically study various forms of pulse reshaping associated with superluminal propagation and its effect on SNR. By studying the behavior of SNR as a function of both space and time, the present analysis predicts the existence of a cutoff distance beyond which signal velocity of a superluminal pulse is delayed as compared to a companion pulse traveling the same distance in vacuum. Finally, the interplay between the relative strength of the medium-generated noise and the detector noise and its effect on signal velocity is discussed.
We study the physical mechanism and the information velocity of fast light based on the time-domain propagator governing light propagation in a dispersive system. We show that the output pulse can be regarded as the superposition of multiple ``copies'' of the input pulse, each traveling at a well-defined signal velocity no greater than the speed of light in vacuum, and the interference between the front edges of these copies generates the peak of the output pulse. The information velocity is defined as the ratio of the propagation distance to the mini-mum time required to complete any given information transfer process, directly reflecting how fast the signal of interest, i.e., the part of the pulse that carries the information of interest, propagates. With the peak of the output pulse representing the information, as is typical in slow- and fast-light applications, we find that the information velocity is significantly smaller than the speed of a discontinuity in the pulse, which was traditionally proposed to be the signal velocity of fast light. The analysis can also be applied to slow-light propagation.
It is a frequent assumption that—via superluminal information transfers—superluminal signals capable of enabling communication are necessarily exchanged in any quantum theory that posits hidden superluminal influences. However, does the presence of hidden superluminal influences automatically imply superluminal signalling and communication? The non-signalling theorem mediates the apparent conflict between quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity. However, as a ‘no-go’ theorem there exist two opposing interpretations of the non-signalling constraint: foundational and operational. Concerning Bell’s theorem, we argue that Bell employed both interpretations, and that he finally adopted the operational position which is associated often with ontological quantum theory, e.g., de Broglie–Bohm theory. This position we refer to as “effective non-signalling”. By contrast, associated with orthodox quantum mechanics is the foundational position referred to here as “axiomatic non-signalling”. In search of a decisive communication-theoretic criterion for differentiating between “axiomatic” and “effective” non-signalling, we employ the operational framework offered by Shannon’s mathematical theory of communication, whereby we distinguish between Shannon signals and non-Shannon signals. We find that an effective non-signalling theorem represents two sub-theorems: (1) Non-transfer-control (NTC) theorem, and (2) Non-signification-control (NSC) theorem. Employing NTC and NSC theorems, we report that effective, instead of axiomatic, non-signalling is entirely sufficient for prohibiting nonlocal communication. Effective non-signalling prevents the instantaneous, i.e., superluminal, transfer of message-encoded information through the controlled use—by a sender-receiver pair —of informationally-correlated detection events, e.g., in EPR-type experiments. An effective non-signalling theorem allows for nonlocal quantum information transfer yet—at the same time—effectively denies superluminal signalling and communication.