Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:nlin/0612018 · Physical Review B

Bottleneck crossover between classical and quantum superfluid turbulence

Victor S. L’vov, Sergey Nazarenko, Oleksii Rudenko

Published Jul 26, 2007• 154 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider superfluid turbulence near absolute zero of temperature generated by classical means, e.g., towed grid or rotation but not by counterflow. We argue that such turbulence consists of a polarized tangle of mutually interacting vortex filaments with quantized vorticity. For this system, we predict and describe a bottleneck accumulation of the energy spectrum at the classical-quantum crossover scale $\ensuremath{\ell}$. Demanding the same energy flux through scales, the value of the energy at the crossover scale should exceed the Kolmogorov-41 (K41) spectrum by a large factor ${\mathrm{ln}}^{10∕3}(\ensuremath{\ell}∕{a}_{0})$ ($\ensuremath{\ell}$ is the mean intervortex distance and ${a}_{0}$ is the vortex core radius) for the classical and quantum spectra to be matched in value. One of the important consequences of the bottleneck is that it causes the mean vortex line density to be considerably higher than that based on K41 alone, and this should be taken into account in (re)interpretation of new (and old) experiments as well as in further theoretical studies.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.76.024520

Related papers

SUPERFLUID TURBULENCE AND DYNAMICS OF QUANTIZED VORTICES

Makoto Tsubota

Superfluid turbulence has been one of the most important problems of superfluid hydrodynamics, in which quantized vortices play a significant role. The recent research on superfluid turbulence enters a new stage rather different from the old ones chiefly devoted to thermal counterflow. After describing the current motivation on these topics, we discuss our research which studies the energy spectrum both by the vortex filament model and the Gross-Pitaevskii model. Both energy spectra are consistent with the Kolmogorov law, which shows a close similarity between superfluid (quantum) and classical turbulence.

Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks•May 4, 2006•0 citations

Classical and quantum regimes of superfluid turbulence

Григорий Ефимович Воловик

We argue that turbulence in superfluids is governed by two dimensionless parameters. One of them is the intrinsic parameter q which characterizes the friction forces acting on a vortex moving with respect to the heat bath, with q −1 playing the same role as the Reynolds number Re= UR/ν in classical hydrodynamics. It marks the transition between the “laminar” and turbulent regimes of vortex dynamics. The developed turbulence described by Kolmogorov cascade occurs when Re≫1 in classical hydrodynamics, and q ≪1 in superfluid hydrodynamics. Another parameter of superfluid turbulence is the superfluid Reynolds number Re s = UR/κ , which contains the circulation quantum κ characterizing quantized vorticity in superfluids. This parameter may regulate the crossover or transition between two classes of superfluid turbulence: (i) the classical regime of Kolmogorov cascade where vortices are locally polarized and the quantization of vorticity is not important; (ii) the quantum Vinen turbulence whose properties are determined by the quantization of vorticity. A phase diagram of the dynamical vortex states is suggested.

arXiv:cond-mat/0310021•Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters•Nov 1, 2003•71 citations

Energy spectra of quantum turbulence: Large-scale simulation and modeling

Narimasa Sasa, Takuma Kano, Masahiko Machida +3 more

In a ${2048}^{3}$ simulation of quantum turbulence within the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, it is demonstrated that the large-scale motions have a classical Kolmogorov-1941 energy spectrum $E(k)\ensuremath{\propto}{k}^{\ensuremath{-}5/3}$, followed by an energy accumulation with $E(k)\ensuremath{\simeq}$ const at $k$ about the reciprocal mean intervortex distance. This behavior was predicted by the L'vov-Nazarenko-Rudenko bottleneck model of gradual eddy-wave crossover [L'vov, Nazarenko, and Rudenko, J. Low Temp. Phys. 153, 140 (2008)], further developed in the paper.

arXiv:1008.3050•Physical Review B•Aug 11, 2011•55 citations

Theoretical Analysis of the Energy Cascade in Quantum Turbulence: From Richardson–Kolmogorov Eddies to Kelvin Waves

Abishek Mahalingam

Abstract Quantum turbulence — the chaotic, non-equilibrium state of a superfluid threaded by a dense tangle of quantized vortex lines — provides a uniquely clean testbed for the universal statistical mechanics of turbulent energy transfer. We develop a theoretical account of the energy cascade across all relevant length scales: from macroscopic, quasi-classical Richardson–Kolmogorov eddies, through the dimensionally frustrated L’vov–Nazarenko–Rudenko (LNR) bottleneck at the mean inter-vortex spacing, down to the weakly nonlinear Kelvin-wave cascade on individual filaments, and finally to the zero-temperature dissipation cutoff. Starting from the Gross–Pitaevskii equation and its Madelung hydrodynamic decomposition, we separate the compressible and incompressible components of the flow to isolate the vortical and acoustic energy channels. Vortex reconnection is identified as the microscopic mechanism coupling these regimes, and the competing predictions of the Vortex Filament Model and the Gross–Pitaevskii equation for reconnection dynamics are compared. We review the theoretical controversy between the Kozik–Svistunov six-wave cascade and the L’vov–Nazarenko four-wave cascade, together with the associated tilt-symmetry debate, and present the finite-temperature two-fluid (HVBK) description, showing how mutual friction locks the normal and superfluid components at large scales while damping Kelvin waves at small scales. PACS numbers: 67.25.dk, 47.37.+q, 03.75.Kk, 47.32.C−

•Jul 10, 2026•0 citations

Quantum turbulence

Tsubota Makoto, Kasamatsu Makoto

Abstract Chapter 5 delves into quantum turbulence in superfluid helium and atomic Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs). The foundation of quantum turbulence research lies in classical fluid dynamics and turbulence, which is why we begin by covering essential concepts like the Reynolds number and Kolmogorov’s -5/3 power law in the energy spectrum. These principles are crucial for understanding quantum turbulence. We then explore the shared aspects of quantum turbulence in superfluid helium and atomic BECs, such as the differences in vortex configurations compared to classical turbulence, energy spectra, cascades, and the distinction between quasiclassical (Kolmogorov) and ultraquantum (Vinen) turbulence, focusing on their decay behaviors. In superfluid helium, we emphasize experimental studies in thermal counterflow and numerical simulations using the Vortex Filament Model (VFM). The advent of visualization experiments in the mid-2000s was transformative, allowing the observation of normal fluid velocity profiles and accelerations via tracer particles, which led to more accurate simulations coupling the VFM with normal fluid dynamics. Another significant topic is the energy spectrum of quantum turbulence, and whether it mirrors classical turbulence remains a key question. In addition to thermal counterflow, localized quantum turbulence generated by oscillating objects has been a major area of study. We present research showing how quantized vortices grow and evolve into turbulence. Superfluid 3He-B also provides a platform for quantum turbulence, with advancements in microfabrication bringing MEMS and NEMS into focus for studying quantum hydrodynamics at micro- and nanoscale, influenced by boundary conditions. In atomic BECs, confined by potentials, turbulence is induced through techniques like shaking or moving potentials. A unique aspect of BECs is two-dimensional quantum turbulence, featuring inverse energy cascades, Onsager vortices, and negative temperature states. Finally, atomic BECs, being compressible, serve as a platform for both vortex and wave turbulence. Multicomponent BECs, such as spinor BECs, introduce spin turbulence, further diversifying the field.

•Dec 2, 2025•0 citations

Diffusive Decay of the Vortex Tangle and Kolmogorov turbulence in quantum fluids

Sergey K. Nemirovskii, Л. П. Кондаурова

The idea that chaotic set of quantum vortices can mimic classical turbulence, or at least reproduce many main features, is currently actively being developed. Appreciating significance of the challenging problem of the classical turbulence it can be expressed that the idea to study it in terms of quantized line is indeed very important and may be regarded as a breakthrough. For this reason, this theory should be carefully scrutinized. One of the basic arguments supporting this point of view is the fact that vortex tangle decays at zero temperature, when the apparent mechanism of dissipation (mutual friction) is absent. Since the all possible mechanisms of dissipation of the vortex energy, discussed in the literature, are related to the small scales, it is natural to suggest that the Kolmogorov cascade takes the place with the flow of the energy, just as in the classical turbulence. In a series of recent experiment attenuation of vortex line density was observed and authors attribute this decay to the properties of the Kolmogorov turbulence. In the present work we discuss alternative possibility of decay of the vortex tangle, which is not related to dissipation at small scales. This mechanism is just the diffusive like spreading of the vortex tangle. We discuss a number of the key experiments, considering them both from the point of view of alternative explanation and of the theory of Kolmogorov turbulence in quantum fluids.

arXiv:1007.0480•Jul 3, 2010•0 citations
We consider superfluid turbulence near absolute zero of temperature generated by classical means, e.g., towed grid or rotation but not by counterflow. We argue that such turbulence consists of a polarized tangle of mutually interacting vortex filaments with quantized vorticity. For this system, we predict and describe a bottleneck accumulation of the energy spectrum at the classical-quantum crossover scale \ensuremathℓ\ensuremath{\ell}\ensuremathℓ. Demanding the same energy flux through scales, the value of the energy at the crossover scale should exceed the Kolmogorov-41 (K41) spectrum by a large factor ln10∕3(\ensuremathℓ∕a0){\mathrm{ln}}^{10∕3}(\ensuremath{\ell}∕{a}_{0})ln10∕3(\ensuremathℓ∕a0​) (\ensuremathℓ\ensuremath{\ell}\ensuremathℓ is the mean intervortex distance and a0{a}_{0}a0​ is the vortex core radius) for the classical and quantum spectra to be matched in value. One of the important consequences of the bottleneck is that it causes the mean vortex line density to be considerably higher than that based on K41 alone, and this should be taken into account in (re)interpretation of new (and old) experiments as well as in further theoretical studies.
Superfluid turbulence has been one of the most important problems of superfluid hydrodynamics, in which quantized vortices play a significant role. The recent research on superfluid turbulence enters a new stage rather different from the old ones chiefly devoted to thermal counterflow. After describing the current motivation on these topics, we discuss our research which studies the energy spectrum both by the vortex filament model and the Gross-Pitaevskii model. Both energy spectra are consistent with the Kolmogorov law, which shows a close similarity between superfluid (quantum) and classical turbulence.
We argue that turbulence in superfluids is governed by two dimensionless parameters. One of them is the intrinsic parameter q which characterizes the friction forces acting on a vortex moving with respect to the heat bath, with q −1 playing the same role as the Reynolds number Re= UR/ν in classical hydrodynamics. It marks the transition between the “laminar” and turbulent regimes of vortex dynamics. The developed turbulence described by Kolmogorov cascade occurs when Re≫1 in classical hydrodynamics, and q ≪1 in superfluid hydrodynamics. Another parameter of superfluid turbulence is the superfluid Reynolds number Re s = UR/κ , which contains the circulation quantum κ characterizing quantized vorticity in superfluids. This parameter may regulate the crossover or transition between two classes of superfluid turbulence: (i) the classical regime of Kolmogorov cascade where vortices are locally polarized and the quantization of vorticity is not important; (ii) the quantum Vinen turbulence whose properties are determined by the quantization of vorticity. A phase diagram of the dynamical vortex states is suggested.
In a 20483{2048}^{3}20483 simulation of quantum turbulence within the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, it is demonstrated that the large-scale motions have a classical Kolmogorov-1941 energy spectrum $E(k)\ensuremath{\propto}{k}^{\ensuremath{-}5/3}$, followed by an energy accumulation with $E(k)\ensuremath{\simeq}$ const at kkk about the reciprocal mean intervortex distance. This behavior was predicted by the L'vov-Nazarenko-Rudenko bottleneck model of gradual eddy-wave crossover [L'vov, Nazarenko, and Rudenko, J. Low Temp. Phys. 153, 140 (2008)], further developed in the paper.
Abstract Quantum turbulence — the chaotic, non-equilibrium state of a superfluid threaded by a dense tangle of quantized vortex lines — provides a uniquely clean testbed for the universal statistical mechanics of turbulent energy transfer. We develop a theoretical account of the energy cascade across all relevant length scales: from macroscopic, quasi-classical Richardson–Kolmogorov eddies, through the dimensionally frustrated L’vov–Nazarenko–Rudenko (LNR) bottleneck at the mean inter-vortex spacing, down to the weakly nonlinear Kelvin-wave cascade on individual filaments, and finally to the zero-temperature dissipation cutoff. Starting from the Gross–Pitaevskii equation and its Madelung hydrodynamic decomposition, we separate the compressible and incompressible components of the flow to isolate the vortical and acoustic energy channels. Vortex reconnection is identified as the microscopic mechanism coupling these regimes, and the competing predictions of the Vortex Filament Model and the Gross–Pitaevskii equation for reconnection dynamics are compared. We review the theoretical controversy between the Kozik–Svistunov six-wave cascade and the L’vov–Nazarenko four-wave cascade, together with the associated tilt-symmetry debate, and present the finite-temperature two-fluid (HVBK) description, showing how mutual friction locks the normal and superfluid components at large scales while damping Kelvin waves at small scales. PACS numbers: 67.25.dk, 47.37.+q, 03.75.Kk, 47.32.C−
Abstract Chapter 5 delves into quantum turbulence in superfluid helium and atomic Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs). The foundation of quantum turbulence research lies in classical fluid dynamics and turbulence, which is why we begin by covering essential concepts like the Reynolds number and Kolmogorov’s -5/3 power law in the energy spectrum. These principles are crucial for understanding quantum turbulence. We then explore the shared aspects of quantum turbulence in superfluid helium and atomic BECs, such as the differences in vortex configurations compared to classical turbulence, energy spectra, cascades, and the distinction between quasiclassical (Kolmogorov) and ultraquantum (Vinen) turbulence, focusing on their decay behaviors. In superfluid helium, we emphasize experimental studies in thermal counterflow and numerical simulations using the Vortex Filament Model (VFM). The advent of visualization experiments in the mid-2000s was transformative, allowing the observation of normal fluid velocity profiles and accelerations via tracer particles, which led to more accurate simulations coupling the VFM with normal fluid dynamics. Another significant topic is the energy spectrum of quantum turbulence, and whether it mirrors classical turbulence remains a key question. In addition to thermal counterflow, localized quantum turbulence generated by oscillating objects has been a major area of study. We present research showing how quantized vortices grow and evolve into turbulence. Superfluid 3He-B also provides a platform for quantum turbulence, with advancements in microfabrication bringing MEMS and NEMS into focus for studying quantum hydrodynamics at micro- and nanoscale, influenced by boundary conditions. In atomic BECs, confined by potentials, turbulence is induced through techniques like shaking or moving potentials. A unique aspect of BECs is two-dimensional quantum turbulence, featuring inverse energy cascades, Onsager vortices, and negative temperature states. Finally, atomic BECs, being compressible, serve as a platform for both vortex and wave turbulence. Multicomponent BECs, such as spinor BECs, introduce spin turbulence, further diversifying the field.
The idea that chaotic set of quantum vortices can mimic classical turbulence, or at least reproduce many main features, is currently actively being developed. Appreciating significance of the challenging problem of the classical turbulence it can be expressed that the idea to study it in terms of quantized line is indeed very important and may be regarded as a breakthrough. For this reason, this theory should be carefully scrutinized. One of the basic arguments supporting this point of view is the fact that vortex tangle decays at zero temperature, when the apparent mechanism of dissipation (mutual friction) is absent. Since the all possible mechanisms of dissipation of the vortex energy, discussed in the literature, are related to the small scales, it is natural to suggest that the Kolmogorov cascade takes the place with the flow of the energy, just as in the classical turbulence. In a series of recent experiment attenuation of vortex line density was observed and authors attribute this decay to the properties of the Kolmogorov turbulence. In the present work we discuss alternative possibility of decay of the vortex tangle, which is not related to dissipation at small scales. This mechanism is just the diffusive like spreading of the vortex tangle. We discuss a number of the key experiments, considering them both from the point of view of alternative explanation and of the theory of Kolmogorov turbulence in quantum fluids.