The path integral approach to the quantization of one degree-of-freedom Newtonian particles is considered within the discrete time-slicing approach, as in Feynman's original development. In the time-slicing approximation the quantum mechanical evolution will generally not have any stationary states. We look for conditions on the potential energy term such that the quantum mechanical evolution may possess stationary states without having to perform a continuum limit. When the stationary states are postulated to be solutions of a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) eigenvalue problem it is found that the potential is required to be a solution of a particular first-order ODE. Similarly, when the stationary states are postulated to be solutions of a second-order ordinary difference equation (O$Δ$E) eigenvalue problem the potential is required to be a solution of a particular first-order O$Δ$E. The classical limits (which are at times very nontrivial) are integrable maps.
The path integral approach to the quantization of one degree-of-freedom Newtonian particles is considered within the discrete time-slicing approach, as in Feynman's original development. In the time-slicing approximation the quantum mechanical evolution will generally not have any stationary states. We look for conditions on the potential energy term such that the quantum mechanical evolution may possess stationary states without having to perform a continuum limit. When the stationary states are postulated to be solutions of a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) eigenvalue problem it is found that the potential is required to be a solution of a particular first-order ODE. Similarly, when the stationary states are postulated to be solutions of a second-order ordinary difference equation (OΔE) eigenvalue problem the potential is required to be a solution of a particular first-order OΔE. The classical limits (which are at times very nontrivial) are integrable maps.
AbstractThis work investigates a variational perspective on the Feynman path integral, aiming to explore connections between stationary action, probability amplitude, integrating over path evolutions, and the semiclassical limit. The variational analysis employed should be viewed as conceptually explorative and heuristic rather than strictly formal. It explores how variations of path evolutions in the path integral at the level of a single infinitesimal slice can yield meaningful insight into the behavior of quantum trajectories. A local variational analysis of the free particle and a particle near a constant potential provides insight into how the stationary-action principle underlies both classical and quantum behavior, through a local relationship between the classical slice-action and a functional over the phase-weighting of quantum path evolutions. In particular, this functional is proportional to the slice-action itself up to additive and multiplicative constants. This proportionality implies that the stationarity of this functional is equivalent to the stationarity of the slice-action, which in turn generates the semiclassical stationary path evolution. The resulting formulation produces results consistent with known short-time propagators for the free particle and a particle near a constant potential, including tunneling behavior.
The path integral formulation in quantum mechanics corresponds to the first quantization since it is just to rewrite the quantum mechanical amplitude into many dimensional integrations over discretized coordinates xn. However, the path integral expression cannot be connected to the dynamics of classical mechanics, even though, superficially, there is some similarity between them. Further, the field theory path integral in terms of many dimensional integrations over fields does not correspond to the field quantization. We clarify the essential difference between Feynman's original formulation of path integral in QED and the modern version of the path integral method prevailing in lattice field theory calculations, and show that the former can make a correct second quantization while the latter cannot quantize fields at all and its physical meaning is unknown.
The Feynman path integral formulation of quantum mechanics is a path integral representation for a propagator or probability amplitude in going between two points in space-time. The wave function is expressed in terms of an integral equation from which the Schrodinger equation can be derived. On taking the limit h — 0, the method of stationary phase can be applied and Newton's second law of motion is obtained. Also, the condition the phase vanishes leads to the Hamilton - Jacobi equation. The secondary objective of this paper is to study ways of relating quantum mechanics and classical mechanics. The Ehrenfest theorem is applied to a particle in an electromagnetic field. Expressions are found which are the hermitian Lorentz force operator, the hermitian torque operator, and the hermitian power operator.
The aim of this chapter is to introduce the concept of the Feynman path integral. As well as developing the general construction scheme, particular emphasis is placed on establishing the interconnections between the quantum mechanical path integral, classical Hamiltonian mechanics, and classical statistical mechanics. The practice of path integration is discussed in the context of several pedagogical applications. As well as the canonical examples of a quantum particle in a single and a double potential well, we discuss the generalization of the path integral scheme to tunneling of extended objects (quantum fields), dissipative and thermally assisted quantum tunneling, and the quantum mechanical spin. In this chapter we temporarily leave the arena of many-body physics and second quantization and, at least superficially, return to single-particle quantum mechanics. By establishing the path integral approach for ordinary quantum mechanics, we will set the stage for the introduction of field integral methods for many-body theories explored in the next chapter. We will see that the path integral not only represents a gateway to higher-dimensional functional integral methods but, when viewed from an appropriate perspective, already represents a field theoretical approach in its own right. Exploiting this connection, various concepts of field theory, namely stationary phase analysis, the Euclidean formulation of field theory, instanton techniques, and the role of topology in field theory, are introduced in this chapter. The path integral: general formalism Broadly speaking, there are two approaches to the formulation of quantum mechanics: the “operator approach” based on the canonical quantization of physical observables and the associated operator algebra, and the Feynman path integral.
The aim of this chapter is to introduce the concept of the Feynman path integral. As well as developing the general construction scheme, particular emphasis is placed on establishing the interconnections between the quantum mechanical path integral, classical Hamiltonian mechanics, and classical statistical mechanics. The practice of path integration is discussed in the context of several pedagogical applications. As well as the canonical examples of a quantum particle in a single and a double potential well, we discuss the generalization of the path integral scheme to tunneling of extended objects (quantum fields), dissipative and thermally assisted quantum tunneling, and the quantum mechanical spin. In this chapter we will temporarily leave the arena of many-body physics and second quantization and, at least superficially, return to single-particle quantum mechanics. By establishing the path integral approach for ordinary quantum mechanics, we will set the stage for the introduction of functional field integral methods for many-body theories explored in the next chapter. We will see that the path integral not only represents a gateway to higher-dimensional functional integral methods but, when viewed from an appropriate perspective, already represents a field theoretical approach in its own right. Exploiting this connection, various techniques and concepts of field theory, namely stationary phase analyses of functional integrals, the Euclidean formulation of field theory, instanton techniques, and the role of topological concepts in field theory, will be motivated and introduced in this chapter.
In the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, observables are represented by operators in a Hilbert space and states by vectors in it. Quantum field theory too is formulated in terms of field operators. States in field theory include the vacuum state, one particle states, two particle states and so on. One does not measure operators or state vectors, however; measurements involve eigenvalues of operators or transition probabilities between states. It turns out that one can formulate quantum mechanics and field theory without using operators. Indeed, the probability amplitude for a transition from a position q1 at time t1 to a position q2 at time t2 can be expressed as a path integral ∫ dt L(q(t),q˙(t)), (5.1) where q(t) runs over all possible functions satisfying the conditions q(t1) = q1, q(t2) = q2 (5.2) and the integral over q(t) is an integral over all such paths of the exponential evaluated for each path. The measure of integration is not well defined a priori, but it is possible to give prescriptions that make sense. In classical mechanics, positions at two different times determine a path from the second order differential equation of motion, which yields a definite solution if two conditions are imposed. In contrast, quantum mechanics does not allow us to talk about trajectories. The path integral formulation manifestly refers to the myriad paths that may be taken by a particle in going from one point to another. It goes so far as to assign a probability amplitude to each path, and it is related to the classical action corresponding to that path. However, it is complex and it also involves a superposition, characteristic of quantum mechanics.