Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:math/0605015 · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment

Bethe eigenvectors of higher transfer matrices

Evgeny Mukhin, V. Tarasov, A Varchenko

Published Aug 3, 2006• 53 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider the XXX -type and Gaudin quantum integrable models associated with the Lie algebra . The models are defined on a tensor product of irreducible -modules. For each model, there exist N one-parameter families of commuting operators on , called the transfer matrices. We show that the Bethe vectors for these models, given by the algebraic nested Bethe ansatz, are eigenvectors of higher transfer matrices and compute the corresponding eigenvalues.

DOI
10.1088/1742-5468/2006/08/p08002

Related papers

Bethe Eigenvectors of Higher Transfer Matrices

Evgeny Mukhin

We consider the XXX-type and Gaudin quantum integrable models associated with the Lie algebra gl N. The models are defined on a tensor product M1 ⊗... ⊗ Mn of irreducible gl N-modules. For each model, there exist N oneparameter families of commuting operators on M1 ⊗... ⊗ Mn, called the transfer matrices. We show that the Bethe vectors for these models, given by the algebraic nested Bethe ansatz, are eigenvectors of higher transfer matrices and compute the corresponding eigenvalues.

•Jan 1, 2006•88 citations

On Bethe eigenvectors and higher transfer matrices for supersymmetric spin chains

Kang Lu

Abstract We study the $$ {\mathfrak{gl}}_{m\mid n} $$ gl m ∣ n XXX spin chains defined on tensor products of highest weight $$ {\mathfrak{gl}}_{m\mid n} $$ gl m ∣ n -modules. We show that the on-shell Bethe vectors are eigenvectors of higher transfer matrices and compute the corresponding eigenvalues. Then we take the classical limits and obtain the corresponding results for the $$ {\mathfrak{gl}}_{m\mid n} $$ gl m ∣ n Gaudin models.

arXiv:2209.14416•Journal of High Energy Physics•Apr 24, 2023•2 citations

“Twisted” rational r-matrices and the algebraic Bethe ansatz: Applications to generalized Gaudin models, Bose–Hubbard dimers, and Jaynes–Cummings–Dicke-type models

T. Skrypnyk

We construct quantum integrable systems associated with the Lie algebra gl ( n ) and non-skew-symmetric “shifted and twisted” rational r-matrices. The obtained models include Gaudin-type models with and without an external magnetic field, n-level ( n −1)-mode Jaynes–Cummings–Dicke-type models in the Λ-configuration, a vector generalization of Bose–Hubbard dimers, etc. We diagonalize quantum Hamiltonians of the constructed integrable models using a nested Bethe ansatz.

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 2016•6 citations

Singular and nonsingular eigenvectors for the Gaudin model

Daniela Garajeu, Annamária Kiss

We present a method to construct a basis of singular and nonsingular common eigenvectors for Gaudin Hamiltonians in a tensor product module of the Lie algebra SL(2). The subset of singular vectors is completely described by analogy with covariant differential operators. The relation between singular eigenvectors and the Bethe Ansatz is discussed. In each weight subspace the set of singular eigenvectors is completed to a basis, by a family of nonsingular eigenvectors. We discuss also the generalization of this method to the case of an arbitrary Lie algebra.

arXiv:math-ph/0201062•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2001•11 citations

Algebraic Bethe ansatz for the elliptic quantum group $E_{\tau,\eta}(sl_2)$

Alexander N. Varchenko, Giovanni Felder

To each representation of the elliptic quantum group $E_{\tau,\eta}(sl_2)$ is associated a family of commuting transfer matrices. We give common eigenvectors by a version of the algebraic Bethe ansatz method. Special cases of this construction give eigenvectors for IRF models, for the eight-vertex model and for the two-body Ruijsenaars operator. The latter is a $q$-deformation of Hermite's solution of the Lam\'e equation.

•Jul 2, 2021•0 citations

“Generalized” algebraic Bethe ansatz, Gaudin-type models and Z-graded classical r-matrices

T. Skrypnyk

We consider quantum integrable systems associated with reductive Lie algebra g l ( n ) and Cartan-invariant non-skew-symmetric classical r -matrices. We show that under certain restrictions on the form of classical r -matrices “nested” or “hierarchical” Bethe ansatz usually based on a chain of subalgebras g l ( n ) ⊃ g l ( n − 1 ) ⊃ . . . ⊃ g l ( 1 ) is generalized onto the other chains or “hierarchies” of subalgebras. We show that among the r -matrices satisfying such the restrictions there are “twisted” or Z p -graded non-skew-symmetric classical r -matrices. We consider in detail example of the generalized Gaudin models with and without external magnetic field associated with Z p -graded non-skew-symmetric classical r -matrices and find the spectrum of the corresponding Gaudin-type hamiltonians using nested Bethe ansatz scheme and a chain of subalgebras g l ( n ) ⊃ g l ( n − n 1 ) ⊃ g l ( n − n 1 − n 2 ) ⊃ g l ( n − ( n 1 + . . . + n p − 1 ) ) , where n 1 + n 2 + . . . + n p = n .

Nuclear Physics B•Sep 19, 2016•5 citations
We consider the XXX -type and Gaudin quantum integrable models associated with the Lie algebra . The models are defined on a tensor product of irreducible -modules. For each model, there exist N one-parameter families of commuting operators on , called the transfer matrices. We show that the Bethe vectors for these models, given by the algebraic nested Bethe ansatz, are eigenvectors of higher transfer matrices and compute the corresponding eigenvalues.
Abstract We study the glm∣n {\mathfrak{gl}}_{m\mid n} glm∣n​ gl m ∣ n XXX spin chains defined on tensor products of highest weight glm∣n {\mathfrak{gl}}_{m\mid n} glm∣n​ gl m ∣ n -modules. We show that the on-shell Bethe vectors are eigenvectors of higher transfer matrices and compute the corresponding eigenvalues. Then we take the classical limits and obtain the corresponding results for the glm∣n {\mathfrak{gl}}_{m\mid n} glm∣n​ gl m ∣ n Gaudin models.
We present a method to construct a basis of singular and nonsingular common eigenvectors for Gaudin Hamiltonians in a tensor product module of the Lie algebra SL(2). The subset of singular vectors is completely described by analogy with covariant differential operators. The relation between singular eigenvectors and the Bethe Ansatz is discussed. In each weight subspace the set of singular eigenvectors is completed to a basis, by a family of nonsingular eigenvectors. We discuss also the generalization of this method to the case of an arbitrary Lie algebra.
Algebraic Bethe ansatz for the elliptic quantum group Eτ,η(sl2)E_{\tau,\eta}(sl_2)Eτ,η​(sl2​)
To each representation of the elliptic quantum group Eτ,η(sl2)E_{\tau,\eta}(sl_2)Eτ,η​(sl2​) is associated a family of commuting transfer matrices. We give common eigenvectors by a version of the algebraic Bethe ansatz method. Special cases of this construction give eigenvectors for IRF models, for the eight-vertex model and for the two-body Ruijsenaars operator. The latter is a qqq-deformation of Hermite's solution of the Lam\'e equation.
We consider quantum integrable systems associated with reductive Lie algebra g l ( n ) and Cartan-invariant non-skew-symmetric classical r -matrices. We show that under certain restrictions on the form of classical r -matrices “nested” or “hierarchical” Bethe ansatz usually based on a chain of subalgebras g l ( n ) ⊃ g l ( n − 1 ) ⊃ . . . ⊃ g l ( 1 ) is generalized onto the other chains or “hierarchies” of subalgebras. We show that among the r -matrices satisfying such the restrictions there are “twisted” or Z p -graded non-skew-symmetric classical r -matrices. We consider in detail example of the generalized Gaudin models with and without external magnetic field associated with Z p -graded non-skew-symmetric classical r -matrices and find the spectrum of the corresponding Gaudin-type hamiltonians using nested Bethe ansatz scheme and a chain of subalgebras g l ( n ) ⊃ g l ( n − n 1 ) ⊃ g l ( n − n 1 − n 2 ) ⊃ g l ( n − ( n 1 + . . . + n p − 1 ) ) , where n 1 + n 2 + . . . + n p = n .