Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:math-ph/9807008

Classical Geometric Interaction- picture-like Description

Shao, M. X, Zhenduo Zhu

Published Jul 10, 1998• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In order to get the classical analogue of quantum interaction picture in classical symplectic geometric description, the space of solutions of free equations of motion is suggested to replace the phase space in $T^{*}Q$ description or the space of motions in usual classical symplectic geometric description. The way to determine measured values of observables in this scheme is worked out.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.math-ph/9807008

Related papers

Classical Geometric Description of Interacting System Based on Solution Space of Free Motion

Shao Ming-Xue, Zhu ZhongYuan

Tn order to carry out the interaction picture in geometric quantization, we suggest to use the solution space of free equations of motion to replace the phase space in T* Q description or the space of motions in usual classical symplectic geometric description, and then a two-parameter formulation is designed to describe the evolution of classical interacting system. This is the classical analogue of quantum interaction picture in classical symplectic geometric description.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Jun 15, 2000•1 citation

An Introduction To Geometric Prequantization

Geraci, Joseph

Classical mechanics has a natural mathematical setting in symplectic geometry and it may be asked if the same is true for quantum mechanics. More precisely, is it possible to capture certain quantum idiosyncrasies within the symplectic framework of classical mechanics? Beginning with Dirac, the idea of quantizing a classical system involved associating the phase space variables with Hermitian operators which act on some Hilbert space, as well as associating the Poisson bracket on the phase space with the commutator for the operators. Mathematically the phase space is associated with some symplectic manifold $M$ and the non-degenerate 2-form $ω$, which comes with $M$. Geometric prequantization is a process by which one does this in a mathematically "rigorous" manner and we shall attempt to just introduce the methods here. We do this by exploring this contruction for ($\mathbb{R}^{2n}, \sum_{i=1}^n dp_i \wedge dq_i$) which avoids using complex line bundles in any non-trivial way. One should note however that the Hilbert space one obtains is in fact too "big", in the sense that it has too many functions in order to correspond with actual physically significant Hilbert spaces. Geometric quantization remedies this situation but it should be noted that not all manifolds are prequantizable. We shall not discuss either of these issues however.

arXiv:0911.0964•Nov 5, 2009•4 citations

The symplectic geometrical formulation of quantum hydrodynamics

Andika Kusuma Wijaya, Arief Hermanto, Muhammad Farchani Rosyid

Quantum hydrodynamics described by Madelung equations is analyzed in the framework of symplectic geometry i.e. in covariant phase space approach to geometric field theory. The pre-symplectic manifolds providing the phase spaces describing the Hamiltonian dynamics of quantum fluid are constructed from the set of all solutions of Madelung equations and their corresponding Lagrangian densities. The Madelung equations under consideration are the Madelung equations associated to Schroedinger equations (in the nonrelativistic case) and Madelung equations associated to Klein–Gordon equations (in the relativistic case). The cases where the coupling with electromagnetic fields is present are also considered here. Our symplectic formulation is different from that of [M. Spera, Moment map and gauge geometric aspects of the Schrodinger and Pauli equations, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 13 (2016) 1–36] in the choice of fundamental fields or variables. Here we regard density function [Formula: see text] and phase function [Formula: see text] not as canonical pair but as the fundamental fields of the theory. The Hamiltonian vector fields corresponding to an observable are obtained from the Hamiltonian equation generated by the observable. The Poisson bracket of two observables then is determined by the Hamiltonian vector fields associated to each observable. In general, the Poisson bracket of two observables is not unique due to the fact that every observable has more than one corresponding Hamiltonian vector field. It is pointed out that the Poisson bracket has a unique value over a certain subset of the set of all observables defined on the pre-symplectic manifold of the Madelung equation under consideration.

International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Jul 1, 2022•3 citations

Geometric quantization

Geometric quantization is an attempt at using the differential-geometric ingredients of classical phase spaces regarded as symplectic manifolds in order to define a corresponding quantum theory. Generally, the process of geometric quantization is applicable to other symplectic manifolds, not only cotangent spaces. The resulting formalism provides a way of looking at quantum theory that is distinct from conventional approaches to the subject, e.g., the Dirac bra-ket formalism. In particular, such familiar features as the quantization of spin, the canonical quantization of position and momentum, and the Schr\{o}dinger equation all emerge from geometric quantization. This paper serves as a review of the subject written in an informal style, often taking an example-based approach to exposition, and attempts to present the material without assuming the reader is an expert in differential geometry.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2005•3 citations

A geometric picture of quantum mechanics with noncommutative values for observables

Otto C. W. Kong

We present here what we consider a new picture of quantum mechanics with the position and momentum observables as coordinates of the usual quantum phase space of a single particle, which also serves as the model of the physical space. To minimize the mathematics involved, we stick here to the Hilbert space picture of the phase space. We argue that a quantum observable should be seen as taking noncommutative values each of which can equivalently be represented by an infinite number of real numbers. The six noncommutative values of the position and momentum observables hence serve as an alternative system of coordinates for the Hilbert space. The values can, at least in principle, be experimentally determined. This can be seen as a complete resolution of the Einstein–Bohr debate that Einstein would probably be happy with. What we have is a solid noncommutative geometrical picture of the physical space, or spacetime, beyond the Newtonian and Einsteinian framework that is sure to be relevant to Nature directly coupled with the idea that each physical quantity should better be seen as having a value beyond what can be represented by a number. We finish by sketching some implications of the results for the physics and mathematics of quantum spacetime in general.

Results in Physics•Nov 20, 2020•16 citations

Geometric Quantization

Andrea Carosso

Geometric quantization is an attempt at using the differential-geometric ingredients of classical phase spaces regarded as symplectic manifolds in order to define a corresponding quantum theory. Generally, the process of geometric quantization is applicable to other symplectic manifolds, not only cotangent spaces. The resulting formalism provides a way of looking at quantum theory that is distinct from conventional approaches to the subject, e.g., the Dirac bra-ket formalism. In particular, such familiar features as the quantization of spin, the canonical quantization of position and momentum, and the Schrödinger equation all emerge from geometric quantization. This paper serves as a review of the subject written in an informal style, often taking an example-based approach to exposition, and attempts to present the material without assuming the reader is an expert in differential geometry.

arXiv:1801.02307•Jan 8, 2018•1 citation
In order to get the classical analogue of quantum interaction picture in classical symplectic geometric description, the space of solutions of free equations of motion is suggested to replace the phase space in T∗QT^{*}QT∗Q description or the space of motions in usual classical symplectic geometric description. The way to determine measured values of observables in this scheme is worked out.
Classical mechanics has a natural mathematical setting in symplectic geometry and it may be asked if the same is true for quantum mechanics. More precisely, is it possible to capture certain quantum idiosyncrasies within the symplectic framework of classical mechanics? Beginning with Dirac, the idea of quantizing a classical system involved associating the phase space variables with Hermitian operators which act on some Hilbert space, as well as associating the Poisson bracket on the phase space with the commutator for the operators. Mathematically the phase space is associated with some symplectic manifold MMM and the non-degenerate 2-form ωωω, which comes with MMM. Geometric prequantization is a process by which one does this in a mathematically "rigorous" manner and we shall attempt to just introduce the methods here. We do this by exploring this contruction for (R2n,∑i=1ndpi∧dqi\mathbb{R}^{2n}, \sum_{i=1}^n dp_i \wedge dq_iR2n,∑i=1n​dpi​∧dqi​) which avoids using complex line bundles in any non-trivial way. One should note however that the Hilbert space one obtains is in fact too "big", in the sense that it has too many functions in order to correspond with actual physically significant Hilbert spaces. Geometric quantization remedies this situation but it should be noted that not all manifolds are prequantizable. We shall not discuss either of these issues however.
Quantum hydrodynamics described by Madelung equations is analyzed in the framework of symplectic geometry i.e. in covariant phase space approach to geometric field theory. The pre-symplectic manifolds providing the phase spaces describing the Hamiltonian dynamics of quantum fluid are constructed from the set of all solutions of Madelung equations and their corresponding Lagrangian densities. The Madelung equations under consideration are the Madelung equations associated to Schroedinger equations (in the nonrelativistic case) and Madelung equations associated to Klein–Gordon equations (in the relativistic case). The cases where the coupling with electromagnetic fields is present are also considered here. Our symplectic formulation is different from that of [M. Spera, Moment map and gauge geometric aspects of the Schrodinger and Pauli equations, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 13 (2016) 1–36] in the choice of fundamental fields or variables. Here we regard density function [Formula: see text] and phase function [Formula: see text] not as canonical pair but as the fundamental fields of the theory. The Hamiltonian vector fields corresponding to an observable are obtained from the Hamiltonian equation generated by the observable. The Poisson bracket of two observables then is determined by the Hamiltonian vector fields associated to each observable. In general, the Poisson bracket of two observables is not unique due to the fact that every observable has more than one corresponding Hamiltonian vector field. It is pointed out that the Poisson bracket has a unique value over a certain subset of the set of all observables defined on the pre-symplectic manifold of the Madelung equation under consideration.
Geometric quantization is an attempt at using the differential-geometric ingredients of classical phase spaces regarded as symplectic manifolds in order to define a corresponding quantum theory. Generally, the process of geometric quantization is applicable to other symplectic manifolds, not only cotangent spaces. The resulting formalism provides a way of looking at quantum theory that is distinct from conventional approaches to the subject, e.g., the Dirac bra-ket formalism. In particular, such familiar features as the quantization of spin, the canonical quantization of position and momentum, and the Schr\{o}dinger equation all emerge from geometric quantization. This paper serves as a review of the subject written in an informal style, often taking an example-based approach to exposition, and attempts to present the material without assuming the reader is an expert in differential geometry.
We present here what we consider a new picture of quantum mechanics with the position and momentum observables as coordinates of the usual quantum phase space of a single particle, which also serves as the model of the physical space. To minimize the mathematics involved, we stick here to the Hilbert space picture of the phase space. We argue that a quantum observable should be seen as taking noncommutative values each of which can equivalently be represented by an infinite number of real numbers. The six noncommutative values of the position and momentum observables hence serve as an alternative system of coordinates for the Hilbert space. The values can, at least in principle, be experimentally determined. This can be seen as a complete resolution of the Einstein–Bohr debate that Einstein would probably be happy with. What we have is a solid noncommutative geometrical picture of the physical space, or spacetime, beyond the Newtonian and Einsteinian framework that is sure to be relevant to Nature directly coupled with the idea that each physical quantity should better be seen as having a value beyond what can be represented by a number. We finish by sketching some implications of the results for the physics and mathematics of quantum spacetime in general.
Geometric quantization is an attempt at using the differential-geometric ingredients of classical phase spaces regarded as symplectic manifolds in order to define a corresponding quantum theory. Generally, the process of geometric quantization is applicable to other symplectic manifolds, not only cotangent spaces. The resulting formalism provides a way of looking at quantum theory that is distinct from conventional approaches to the subject, e.g., the Dirac bra-ket formalism. In particular, such familiar features as the quantization of spin, the canonical quantization of position and momentum, and the Schrödinger equation all emerge from geometric quantization. This paper serves as a review of the subject written in an informal style, often taking an example-based approach to exposition, and attempts to present the material without assuming the reader is an expert in differential geometry.