Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:math-ph/0505032 · Reports on Mathematical Physics

On the mathematical structure of quantum measurement theory

Geoffrey L. Sewell

Published Oct 1, 2005• 37 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/s0034-4877(05)80074-6

Related papers

On measurement in general quantum theory

Bernard d’Espagnat

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Jun 1, 1974•5 citations

Quantum-like Qualia hypothesis: from Quantum Cognition to Quantum Perception

Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Peter Bruza, Makiko Yamada +2 more

To arbitrate theories of consciousness, scientists need to understand mathematical structures of quality of consciousness, or qualia. The dominant view regards qualia as points in a dimensional space. This view implicitly assumes that qualia can be measured without any effects on it. This contrasts with intuitions and empirical findings to show that by means of internal attention qualia can change when they are measured. What is a proper mathematical structure for entities that are affected by the act of measurement? Here we propose the mathematical structure used in quantum theory, in which we consider qualia as “observables” (i.e., entities that can, in principle, be observed), sensory inputs and internal attention as “states” that specify the context that a measurement takes place, and “measurement outcomes” with probabilities that qualia observables take particular values. Based on this mathematical structure, the Quantum-like Qualia (QQ) hypothesis proposes that qualia observables interact with the world, as if through an interface of sensory inputs and internal attention. We argue that this qualia-interface-world scheme has the same mathematical structure as observables-states-environment in quantum theory. Moreover, within this structure, the concept of an “measurement instrument” in quantum theory can precisely model how measurements affect qualia observables and states. We argue that QQ naturally explains known properties of qualia and predicts that qualia are sometimes indeterminate. Such predictions can be empirically determined by the presence of order effects or violations of Bell inequalities. Confirmation of such predictions substantiates our overarching claim that the mathematical structure of QQ will offer novel insights into the nature of consciousness.

•Jun 2, 2023•5 citations

Quantum-like Qualia hypothesis: from quantum cognition to quantum perception

Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Peter Bruza, Makiko Yamada +2 more

To arbitrate theories of consciousness, scientists need to understand mathematical structures of quality of consciousness, or qualia. The dominant view regards qualia as points in a dimensional space. This view implicitly assumes that qualia can be measured without any effect on them. This contrasts with intuitions and empirical findings to show that by means of internal attention qualia can change when they are measured. What is a proper mathematical structure for entities that are affected by the act of measurement? Here we propose the mathematical structure used in quantum theory, in which we consider qualia as "observables" (i.e., entities that can, in principle, be observed), sensory inputs and internal attention as "states" that specify the context that a measurement takes place, and "measurement outcomes" with probabilities that qualia observables take particular values. Based on this mathematical structure, the Quantum-like Qualia (QQ) hypothesis proposes that qualia observables interact with the world, as if through an interface of sensory inputs and internal attention. We argue that this qualia-interface-world scheme has the same mathematical structure as observables-states-environment in quantum theory. Moreover, within this structure, the concept of a "measurement instrument" in quantum theory can precisely model how measurements affect qualia observables and states. We argue that QQ naturally explains known properties of qualia and predicts that qualia are sometimes indeterminate. Such predictions can be empirically determined by the presence of order effects or violations of Bell inequalities. Confirmation of such predictions substantiates our overarching claim that the mathematical structure of QQ will offer novel insights into the nature of consciousness.

Frontiers in Psychology•Apr 3, 2025•11 citations

On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory

H. D. Zeh

Foundations of Physics•Jan 1, 1970•1,028 citations

The Measurement Problem and the Structure of Quantum Mechanics

Kayoko Awaya

Physics Essays•Mar 1, 1992•2 citations

Quantum measurement and the measurement problem: Mathematical structures, generalized measurements, and applications in quantum information

Sachin .

We present a comprehensive technical review of quantum measurement theory, emphasizing the mathematical structures underlying the measurement problem and their role in modern quantum information science. Beginning with spectral theory and the Born rule, we develop the theory of positive operator-valued measures (POVMs), Kraus operators, and completely positive channels as essential generalizations of projective measurements. We discuss how decoherence theory addresses the preferred-basis and interference problems while leaving the outcome problem formally unresolved, motivating interpretational responses ranging from collapse models to many-worlds scenarios. Throughout, we emphasize the applicability of POVM theory to quantum state discrimination, quantum cryptography, and quantum error correction. The review prioritizes physical motivation and mathematical hints over detailed proofs, suitable for researchers transitioning into quantum foundations or quantum information theory.

International Journal of Physics and Applications•Jul 1, 2025•0 citations
To arbitrate theories of consciousness, scientists need to understand mathematical structures of quality of consciousness, or qualia. The dominant view regards qualia as points in a dimensional space. This view implicitly assumes that qualia can be measured without any effects on it. This contrasts with intuitions and empirical findings to show that by means of internal attention qualia can change when they are measured. What is a proper mathematical structure for entities that are affected by the act of measurement? Here we propose the mathematical structure used in quantum theory, in which we consider qualia as “observables” (i.e., entities that can, in principle, be observed), sensory inputs and internal attention as “states” that specify the context that a measurement takes place, and “measurement outcomes” with probabilities that qualia observables take particular values. Based on this mathematical structure, the Quantum-like Qualia (QQ) hypothesis proposes that qualia observables interact with the world, as if through an interface of sensory inputs and internal attention. We argue that this qualia-interface-world scheme has the same mathematical structure as observables-states-environment in quantum theory. Moreover, within this structure, the concept of an “measurement instrument” in quantum theory can precisely model how measurements affect qualia observables and states. We argue that QQ naturally explains known properties of qualia and predicts that qualia are sometimes indeterminate. Such predictions can be empirically determined by the presence of order effects or violations of Bell inequalities. Confirmation of such predictions substantiates our overarching claim that the mathematical structure of QQ will offer novel insights into the nature of consciousness.
To arbitrate theories of consciousness, scientists need to understand mathematical structures of quality of consciousness, or qualia. The dominant view regards qualia as points in a dimensional space. This view implicitly assumes that qualia can be measured without any effect on them. This contrasts with intuitions and empirical findings to show that by means of internal attention qualia can change when they are measured. What is a proper mathematical structure for entities that are affected by the act of measurement? Here we propose the mathematical structure used in quantum theory, in which we consider qualia as "observables" (i.e., entities that can, in principle, be observed), sensory inputs and internal attention as "states" that specify the context that a measurement takes place, and "measurement outcomes" with probabilities that qualia observables take particular values. Based on this mathematical structure, the Quantum-like Qualia (QQ) hypothesis proposes that qualia observables interact with the world, as if through an interface of sensory inputs and internal attention. We argue that this qualia-interface-world scheme has the same mathematical structure as observables-states-environment in quantum theory. Moreover, within this structure, the concept of a "measurement instrument" in quantum theory can precisely model how measurements affect qualia observables and states. We argue that QQ naturally explains known properties of qualia and predicts that qualia are sometimes indeterminate. Such predictions can be empirically determined by the presence of order effects or violations of Bell inequalities. Confirmation of such predictions substantiates our overarching claim that the mathematical structure of QQ will offer novel insights into the nature of consciousness.
We present a comprehensive technical review of quantum measurement theory, emphasizing the mathematical structures underlying the measurement problem and their role in modern quantum information science. Beginning with spectral theory and the Born rule, we develop the theory of positive operator-valued measures (POVMs), Kraus operators, and completely positive channels as essential generalizations of projective measurements. We discuss how decoherence theory addresses the preferred-basis and interference problems while leaving the outcome problem formally unresolved, motivating interpretational responses ranging from collapse models to many-worlds scenarios. Throughout, we emphasize the applicability of POVM theory to quantum state discrimination, quantum cryptography, and quantum error correction. The review prioritizes physical motivation and mathematical hints over detailed proofs, suitable for researchers transitioning into quantum foundations or quantum information theory.