Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:hep-th/9712245

Reply to Comment on "Duality of x and psi in Quantum Mechanics"

Alon E. Faraggi, Marco Matone

Published Dec 30, 1997• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The content of the comment [hep-th/9712219] is the derivation of Eq.(13) in Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 163 by direct differential calculus: which is precisely the same method we used to derive it (it is in fact difficult to imagine any other possible derivation).
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9712245

Related papers

Reply to “Comment on ‘Contextuality within quantum mechanics manifested in subensemble mean values’ [Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 3430]” [Phys. Lett. A 374 (2010) 1397]

A. K. Pan, Dipankar Home

arXiv:1002.3687•Physics Letters A•Jan 7, 2010•0 citations

Reply to ‘‘Note on ‘Bell’s theorem and the foundation of quantum physics’ ’’ [Am. J. Phys. 5 6, 565 (1988)]

Henry Pierce Stapp

American Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1988•4 citations

Comment on “Classical and Quantum Interaction of the Dipole”

Tomislav Ivezić

In this paper I have presented Comment on Anandan's paper (J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1354 (2000)) [hep-th/9910018].

arXiv:physics/0611010•Physical Review Letters•Mar 9, 2007•12 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Ultracold plasma expansion in quadrupole magnetic field' ”

Sergey Ya. Bronin, Evgenii Vladimirovich Vikhrov, B. B. Zelener +1 more

In this Reply, we respond to the Comment by Schlitters et al. on our recent work [Phys. Rev. E 108, 045209 (2023)10.1103/PhysRevE.108.045209], where we present simulation results of ultracold Sr plasma expansion in a quadrupole magnetic field using a molecular-dynamics method. In the Comment, Schlitters et al. present their experimental results, some of which, from their point of view, contradict our simulation results and others that confirm the experiments of Gorman et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 085002 (2021)10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.085002] and our results. In addition, Schlitters et al. also provide results that were not described in our work. Here we show that there is not a contradiction but a misunderstanding of our results. This is due to the fact that simulations allow the use of processing methods that are difficult to obtain in experiment. We also present different simulation results related to expansion velocity variations that reflect the experimental results of Schlitters et al. and provide an explanation for the origin of these variations.

Physical review. E•Aug 21, 2024•1 citation

Addendum to "Phenomenological Derivation of the Schrodinger Equation"

Fernando Ogiba

Progress in physics•Apr 1, 2014•1 citation

Comment on ''Chiral electromagnetic surface waves on Chern-Simons interfaces'' Phys.Rev.D114(2026)L051903 and on arXiv:2606.12513 by N. Kaloper

Igor Bandos, Bohdan Zvorskyi

We demonstrate that Maxwell electrodynamics interacting with a planar Chern-Simons interface does not have plane wave solutions localized on the interface. We re-examine the derivation of such waves presented by N. Kaloper in [Phys.Rev.D114(2026)L051903] and show that at an intermediate step certain terms were missed in an equation therein. Taking these terms into account changes the final conclusion of [Phys.Rev.D114(2026)L051903]. We also show that the method used in [arXiv:2606.12513 [hep-th]] to reproduce the same result is not consistent.

hep-thCross-listedarXiv:2610.03843•Oct 5, 2026
In this Reply, we respond to the Comment by Schlitters et al. on our recent work [Phys. Rev. E 108, 045209 (2023)10.1103/PhysRevE.108.045209], where we present simulation results of ultracold Sr plasma expansion in a quadrupole magnetic field using a molecular-dynamics method. In the Comment, Schlitters et al. present their experimental results, some of which, from their point of view, contradict our simulation results and others that confirm the experiments of Gorman et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 085002 (2021)10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.085002] and our results. In addition, Schlitters et al. also provide results that were not described in our work. Here we show that there is not a contradiction but a misunderstanding of our results. This is due to the fact that simulations allow the use of processing methods that are difficult to obtain in experiment. We also present different simulation results related to expansion velocity variations that reflect the experimental results of Schlitters et al. and provide an explanation for the origin of these variations.
We demonstrate that Maxwell electrodynamics interacting with a planar Chern-Simons interface does not have plane wave solutions localized on the interface. We re-examine the derivation of such waves presented by N. Kaloper in [Phys.Rev.D114(2026)L051903] and show that at an intermediate step certain terms were missed in an equation therein. Taking these terms into account changes the final conclusion of [Phys.Rev.D114(2026)L051903]. We also show that the method used in [arXiv:2606.12513 [hep-th]] to reproduce the same result is not consistent.