Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:hep-th/9610219 · International Journal of Modern Physics A

UNITARITY OF THE AHARONOV–BOHM SCATTERING AMPLITUDES

Masato Arai A, Hisakazu Minakata

Published Feb 20, 1998• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We discuss the unitarity relation of the Aharonov–Bohm scattering amplitude with the hope that it distinguishes between the differing treatment which employ different incident waves. We find that the original Aharonov–Bohm scattering amplitude satisfies the unitarity relation under the regularization prescription whose theoretical foundation does not appear to be understood. On the other land, the amplitude obtained by Ruijsenaars who uses plane wave as incident wave also satisfies the unitarity relation but in an unusual way.

DOI
10.1142/s0217751x98000366

Related papers

Aharonov–Bohm scattering: The role of the incident wave

Seiji Sakoda, Minoru Omote

The scattering problem under the influence of the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) potential is reconsidered. By solving the Lippmann–Schwinger (LS) equation we obtain the wave function of the scattering state in this system. In spite of working with a plane wave as an incident wave we obtain the same wave function as was given by Aharonov and Bohm. Another method to solve the scattering problem is given by making use of a modified version of Gordon’s idea, which was invented to consider the scattering by the Coulomb potential. These two methods give the same result, which guarantees the validity of taking an incident plane wave as usual to make an analysis of this scattering problem. The scattering problem by a solenoid of finite radius is also discussed, and we find that the vector potential of the solenoid affects the charged particles, even when the magnitude of the flux is an odd integer as well as a noninteger. It is shown that the unitarity of the S matrix holds provided that a plane wave is taken to be an incident one.

arXiv:hep-th/9603185•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1997•17 citations

Does the return flux result in the Aharonov-Bohm scattering amplitude?

Jun Liang

Introducing a new Aharonov-Bohm-type scattering model, the ambiguity of the incoming wave function is avoided and the single-valued wave function is uniquely determined by proper boundary conditions. In our model, however, the return flux plays an important role in deriving the Aharonov-Bohm scattering amplitude.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Aug 15, 1985•9 citations

Some aspects of the Aharonov-Bohm effect

Walter C. Henneberger

It is shown that the Aharonov-Bohm scattering cross section diverges. This presents a problem since the range of the scattering force (Lorentz force) is finite. The cross section found by Aharonov and Bohm (AB) results whether one takes an incident wave function corresponding to particles moving in the incident direction, as was done by AB, or just takes the incident state to be a plane wave. The mechanism by which a localized force results in an infinite cross section is not clear. This is an apparent contradiction to recent proofs that electrodynamics is a local theory.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1980•38 citations

Scattering amplitude in the Aharonov-Bohm gauge field

Paola Giacconi A, Fabio Maltoni B, Roberto Soldati

A general expression for the scattering amplitude of nonrelativistic spinless particles in the Aharonov-Bohm gauge potential is obtained within the time-independent formalism. The result is valid also in the forward direction as well as for any choice of the boundary conditions on the wave function at the flux tube position. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

arXiv:hep-th/9509003•Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Jan 15, 1996•17 citations

The incident wave in Aharonov-Bohm scattering wavefunction

Sahng-Kyoon Yoo, D.K. Park

It is shown that only the infinite angular momentum quantum states contribute to the incident wave in Aharonov-Bohm (AB) scattering. This result is clearly shown by recalculating the AB calculation with arbitrary decomposition of summation over the angular momentum quantum numbers in wave function. It is motivated from the fact that the pole contribution in the integral representation used by Jackiw is given by only the infinite angular momentum states, in which the closed contour integration involving this pole gives just the incident wave.

arXiv:hep-th/9707026•Jul 2, 1997•0 citations

Can elementary quantum mechanics explain the Aharonov–Bohm effect?

C. Magni, Fausto Valz-Gris

It is shown that a satisfactory treatment of the Aharonov–Bohm problem requires no departure from the basic principles of ordinary quantum mechanics, a fact not entirely clear in the literature. The discussion ends up with the same formalism as originally proposed by Aharonov and Bohm, in agreement with experimental facts, although in a way that forces no alteration in the traditional interpretation of vector potentials.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 1995•25 citations
We discuss the unitarity relation of the Aharonov–Bohm scattering amplitude with the hope that it distinguishes between the differing treatment which employ different incident waves. We find that the original Aharonov–Bohm scattering amplitude satisfies the unitarity relation under the regularization prescription whose theoretical foundation does not appear to be understood. On the other land, the amplitude obtained by Ruijsenaars who uses plane wave as incident wave also satisfies the unitarity relation but in an unusual way.
The scattering problem under the influence of the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) potential is reconsidered. By solving the Lippmann–Schwinger (LS) equation we obtain the wave function of the scattering state in this system. In spite of working with a plane wave as an incident wave we obtain the same wave function as was given by Aharonov and Bohm. Another method to solve the scattering problem is given by making use of a modified version of Gordon’s idea, which was invented to consider the scattering by the Coulomb potential. These two methods give the same result, which guarantees the validity of taking an incident plane wave as usual to make an analysis of this scattering problem. The scattering problem by a solenoid of finite radius is also discussed, and we find that the vector potential of the solenoid affects the charged particles, even when the magnitude of the flux is an odd integer as well as a noninteger. It is shown that the unitarity of the S matrix holds provided that a plane wave is taken to be an incident one.
It is shown that the Aharonov-Bohm scattering cross section diverges. This presents a problem since the range of the scattering force (Lorentz force) is finite. The cross section found by Aharonov and Bohm (AB) results whether one takes an incident wave function corresponding to particles moving in the incident direction, as was done by AB, or just takes the incident state to be a plane wave. The mechanism by which a localized force results in an infinite cross section is not clear. This is an apparent contradiction to recent proofs that electrodynamics is a local theory.
It is shown that only the infinite angular momentum quantum states contribute to the incident wave in Aharonov-Bohm (AB) scattering. This result is clearly shown by recalculating the AB calculation with arbitrary decomposition of summation over the angular momentum quantum numbers in wave function. It is motivated from the fact that the pole contribution in the integral representation used by Jackiw is given by only the infinite angular momentum states, in which the closed contour integration involving this pole gives just the incident wave.