Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:hep-th/9511025 · International Journal of Modern Physics A

HOW TO CONSTRUCT A COORDINATE REPRESENTATION OF A HAMILTONIAN OPERATOR ON A TORUS

SUMIO ISHIKAWA, TADASHI MIYAZAKI, KAZUYOSHI YAMAMOTO, MOTOWO YAMANOBE

Published Jul 20, 1996• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The dynamical system of a point particle constrained on a torus is quantized à la Dirac with two kinds of coordinate systems respectively; the Cartesian and toric coordinate systems. In the Cartesian coordinate system, it is difficult to express momentum operators in coordinate representation owing to the complication in structure of the commutation relations between canonical variables. In the toric coordinate system, the commutation relations have a simple form and their solutions in coordinate representation are easily obtained with, furthermore, two quantum Hamiltonians turning up. A problem comes out when the coordinate system is transformed, after quantization, from the Cartesian to the toric coordinate system.

DOI
10.1142/s0217751x96001607

Related papers

Requirements of the Canonical Quantization in Different Coordinates

Chen Yuan-li

This article illustrates that when we get the formula of _i_j from canonical commutation rules _i,_j=iδ_(ij),we must take into account at the same time the Hermiticity of _j.To get the right quantum Hamiltonian operator  in non-Cartesian coordinates,we always need to change  in Cartesian coordinates into non-Cartesian coordinates by using the coordinates transformation.

Journal of Xihua Teachers College•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Derivation of the coordinate-momentum commutation relations from canonical invariance

Moshe Shapiro

Based on (i) the spectral resolution definition of the momentum operator, (ii) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum Hermitian operators, (iii) the definition of conjugate coordinate-momentum variables in classical mechanics, and (iv) the invariance of the classical Hamiltonian to canonical transformations (transformations that change from one set of conjugate variables to another), we show that the $[\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{x},\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{p}]$ coordinate-momentum commutator must have the value $ih$ where $h$ is a real nonzero number (which we can identify with the experimentally determined $\ensuremath{\hbar}$). The results are then extended to include all generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta as well as the Cartesian special-relativistic case.

Physical Review A•Oct 31, 2006•5 citations

Simple construction of the unitary operator to transform from individual particles to Jacobi coordinates

Fan Hong‐Yi, Jack Vanderlinde

The unitary operator for transforming individual particles' coordinates to Jacobi coordinates is constructed in terms of a simple mapping of the classical transformation to quantum Hilbert space in Dirac's coordinate representation. The corresponding normally ordered form of the unitary operator is easily obtained by integration within ordered products.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1991•4 citations

The point form of quantum dynamics and a 4-vector coordinate operator for a spinless particle

Anthony J. Bracken

We construct the analog in the quantum mechanics of a free spinless particle, of Dirac’s formula for the generators of space–time translations in his point form of classical dynamics, where one takes as fundamental variables the generators of homogeneous Lorentz transformations and the coordinate 4-vector of the point where the world line of the particle meets one sheet of a two-sheeted hyperboloid in space–time. A 4-vector coordinate operator is determined for such a particle, with commuting Hermitian components. The corresponding observable is the analog of the coordinate 4-vector of the point on the hyperboloid. This operator bears the same relation to such a surface as the Newton–Wigner operator does to an instant.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1978•0 citations

Some intricacies of the momentum operator in quantum mechanics

Utpal Roy, Suranjana Ghosh, Bhattacharya, Kaushik

In quantum mechanics textbooks the momentum operator is defined in the Cartesian coordinates and rarely the form of the momentum operator in spherical polar coordinates is discussed. Consequently one always generalizes the Cartesian prescription to other coordinates and falls in a trap. In this work we introduce the difficulties one faces when the question of the momentum operator in general curvilinear coordinates arises. We have tried to elucidate the points related to the definition of the momentum operator taking spherical polar coordinates as our specimen coordinate system and proposed an elementary method in which we can ascertain the form of the momentum operator in general coordinate systems.

arXiv:0706.0924•Jun 6, 2007•4 citations

Second Quantization and Representation Theory

Edward M. Corson

The formalism of the second quantization is developed entirely within the framework of the Dirac-Jordan representation theory. The equivalence of this formalism and the methods of ordinary coordinate-spin space is shown, and the equations of "connection" are fully developed. It is shown that the "creation" and "annihilation" operators, and indeed all operators which do not commute with the quantized Hamiltonian and hence whose representatives cannot be explicitly given in a configuration space of a fixed number of dimensions are easily treated in terms of the general representation theory and arise quite naturally. Both types of statistics are considered, and the Fock-Dirac density matrix and self-consistent field are treated as a simple illustration.

Physical Review•Nov 1, 1946•2 citations
The dynamical system of a point particle constrained on a torus is quantized à la Dirac with two kinds of coordinate systems respectively; the Cartesian and toric coordinate systems. In the Cartesian coordinate system, it is difficult to express momentum operators in coordinate representation owing to the complication in structure of the commutation relations between canonical variables. In the toric coordinate system, the commutation relations have a simple form and their solutions in coordinate representation are easily obtained with, furthermore, two quantum Hamiltonians turning up. A problem comes out when the coordinate system is transformed, after quantization, from the Cartesian to the toric coordinate system.
Based on (i) the spectral resolution definition of the momentum operator, (ii) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum Hermitian operators, (iii) the definition of conjugate coordinate-momentum variables in classical mechanics, and (iv) the invariance of the classical Hamiltonian to canonical transformations (transformations that change from one set of conjugate variables to another), we show that the $[\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{x},\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{p}]$ coordinate-momentum commutator must have the value ihihih where hhh is a real nonzero number (which we can identify with the experimentally determined $\ensuremath{\hbar}$). The results are then extended to include all generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta as well as the Cartesian special-relativistic case.
We construct the analog in the quantum mechanics of a free spinless particle, of Dirac’s formula for the generators of space–time translations in his point form of classical dynamics, where one takes as fundamental variables the generators of homogeneous Lorentz transformations and the coordinate 4-vector of the point where the world line of the particle meets one sheet of a two-sheeted hyperboloid in space–time. A 4-vector coordinate operator is determined for such a particle, with commuting Hermitian components. The corresponding observable is the analog of the coordinate 4-vector of the point on the hyperboloid. This operator bears the same relation to such a surface as the Newton–Wigner operator does to an instant.
In quantum mechanics textbooks the momentum operator is defined in the Cartesian coordinates and rarely the form of the momentum operator in spherical polar coordinates is discussed. Consequently one always generalizes the Cartesian prescription to other coordinates and falls in a trap. In this work we introduce the difficulties one faces when the question of the momentum operator in general curvilinear coordinates arises. We have tried to elucidate the points related to the definition of the momentum operator taking spherical polar coordinates as our specimen coordinate system and proposed an elementary method in which we can ascertain the form of the momentum operator in general coordinate systems.
The formalism of the second quantization is developed entirely within the framework of the Dirac-Jordan representation theory. The equivalence of this formalism and the methods of ordinary coordinate-spin space is shown, and the equations of "connection" are fully developed. It is shown that the "creation" and "annihilation" operators, and indeed all operators which do not commute with the quantized Hamiltonian and hence whose representatives cannot be explicitly given in a configuration space of a fixed number of dimensions are easily treated in terms of the general representation theory and arise quite naturally. Both types of statistics are considered, and the Fock-Dirac density matrix and self-consistent field are treated as a simple illustration.