Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:hep-th/9305002 · Foundations of Physics

Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements

Avshalom C. Elitzur, Lev Vaidman

Published Jul 1, 1993• 673 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/bf00736012

Related papers

Interaction Free Measurement of Quantum Systems

Onofrio L. Russo, Liang Jiang

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Feb 28, 2012•0 citations

A Quantum Field Theory View of Interaction Free Measurements

Filipe Barroso, Orfeu Bertolami A

arXiv:1911.03339•Foundations of Physics•Jun 30, 2020•1 citation

Interaction-free measurement and the quantum Zeno effect

M. A. B. Whitaker

Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 1998•10 citations

The Elitzur-Vaidman Interaction-Free Measurements

Lev Vaidman A

The interaction-free measurements proposed by Elitzur and Vaidman (EV IFM) is a quantum mechanical method to find an object that interacts with other systems solely via its explosion without exploding it. In this method, an object can be found without ``touching it'', i.e. without any particle being at its vicinity.

arXiv:0801.2777•Jan 17, 2008•3 citations

Interaction-free measurement: Some interference

R. M. Angelo, Otávio Bueno, Adonai S. Sant’Anna

The polemical term interaction-free measurement (IFM) is analyzed in its interpretative nature. Two seminal works proposing the term are revisited and their underlying interpretations are assessed. The role played by nonlocal quantum correlations (entanglement) is formally discussed and some controversial conceptions in the original treatments are identified. As a result the term IFM is shown to be consistent neither with the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics nor with the lessons provided by the EPR debate.

•Feb 26, 2008•0 citations

Quantum Mechanical Measurements

Eugene Paul Wigner, Mutsuo M. Yanase

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations
The polemical term interaction-free measurement (IFM) is analyzed in its interpretative nature. Two seminal works proposing the term are revisited and their underlying interpretations are assessed. The role played by nonlocal quantum correlations (entanglement) is formally discussed and some controversial conceptions in the original treatments are identified. As a result the term IFM is shown to be consistent neither with the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics nor with the lessons provided by the EPR debate.