Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:hep-th/9205080

Canonical Transformations in Quantum Mechanics

Arlen Anderson

Published May 22, 1992• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Three elementary canonical transformations are shown both to have quantum implementations as finite transformations and to generate, classically and infinitesimally, the full canonical algebra. A general canonical transformation can, in principle, be realized quantum mechanically as a product of these transformations. It is found that the intertwining of two super-Hamiltonians is equivalent to there being a canonical transformation between them. A consequence is that the procedure for solving a differential equation can be viewed as a sequence of elementary canonical transformations trivializing the super-Hamiltonian associated to the equation. It is proposed that the quantum integrability of a system is equivalent to the existence of such a sequence.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9205080

Related papers

Canonical Transformations in Quantum Mechanics

Arlen Anderson

Quantum canonical transformations are defined algebraically outside of a Hilbert space context. This generalizes the quantum canonical transformations of Weyl and Dirac to include non-unitary transformations. The importance of non-unitary transformations for constructing solutions of the Schr\\"odinger equation is discussed. Three elementary canonical transformations are shown both to have quantum implementations as finite transformations and to generate, classically and infinitesimally, the full canonical algebra. A general canonical transformation can be realized quantum mechanically as a product of these transformations. Each transformation corresponds to a familiar tool used in solving differential equations, and the procedure of solving a differential equation is systematized by the use of the canonical transformations. Several examples are done to illustrate the use of the canonical transformations. [This is an extensively revised version of hep-th-9205080: the first third of the paper is new material; the notation has been simplified, and further discussion has been added to the remainder.]

•May 13, 1993•100 citations

hep-th/9305054 Canonical Transformations in Quantum Mechanics

Arlen Anderson, Montréal Pq Canada Ha T

Quantum canonical transformations are defined algebraically outside of a Hilbert space context. This generalizes the quantum canonical transformations of Weyl and Dirac to include non-unitary transformations. The importance of non-unitary transformations for constructing solutions of the Schrödinger equation is discussed. Three elementary canonical transformations are shown both to have quantum implementations as finite transformations and to generate, classically and infinitesimally, the full canonical algebra. A general canonical transformation can be realized quantum mechanically as a product of these transformations. Each transformation corresponds to a familiar tool used in solving differential equations, and

•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Integration of the Schrödinger equation by canonical transformations

Gin-yih Tsaur, Jyhpyng Wang

Owing to the operator nature of the quantum dynamical variables, classical canonical transformations for integrating the equations of motion cannot be extended to the quantum domain. In this paper, a general procedure is developed to construct the sequences of quantum canonical transformations for integrating the Schr\"odinger equations. The sequence is made of three elementary canonical transformations that constitute a much larger class than the unitary transformations. In conjunction with the procedure, we also developed a factorization technique that is analogous to the method of integration factor in classical integration. For demonstration, with the same procedure we integrate nine nontrivial models, including the centripetal barrier potential, the Kratzer's molecular potential, the Morse potential, the P\"oschl-Teller potential, the Hulth\'en potential, etc.

Physical Review A•Dec 10, 2001•11 citations

Sequences of point transformations and linear canonical transformations in classical and quantum mechanics

F. Leyvraz, T. H. Seligman

Sequences of point transformations and canonical linear transformations are considered in classical and quantum mechanics. It is shown that the unitary representations of such transformations can be obtained, in general, in the sense that in the limit, classical behavior is retrieved. In the particular case of one point transformation combined with two linear transformations, the results found in this way are exact. A new class of differential equations is thereby solved by quadratures.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1989•18 citations

Canonical transformations and non-unitary evolution

E. D. D. Davis, G. I. Ghandour

We test the idea that transformations which, at the classical level, can be interpreted as evolutions are represented within quantum mechanics by unitary operators. To this end, we consider non-trivial canonical transformations which leave invariant the form of the Hamilton function of a system. We demonstrate that infinite families of such transformations exist for a variety of familiar conservative systems of one degree of freedom. We show how the precise form of integral equations for the stationary state wavefunctions implied by the existence of these canonical transformations can be pinned down by exploiting the algebra of the transformations and a symmetry of their generating functions. We recover several integral equations found in the literature on standard special functions of mathematical physics. We find that when one of the classical canonical transformations we consider is non-linear, its quantum implementation is non-unitary. We end with some comments on the implications of our findings for semiclassical studies and a brief discussion relevant to string theory of the generalization to scalar field theories in 1 + 1 dimensions.

arXiv:quant-ph/9905002•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 5, 2002•3 citations

Point transformations in quantum mechanics

Kurt Bernardo Wolf

First a review is presented of the definition and properties of classical and quantum canonical transformations, from the point of view of a current program on the role of canonical transformations in quantum mechanics. The groups and the corresponding infinitesimal algebras are explored. The subgroup of point transformations (i.e. canonical transformations between pairs of conjugate observables, where one of a pair is function only of one of the other pair) is of special interest since it is a group of transformations for which classical and quantum mechanics follow each other. Only the group of inhomogeneous symplectic transformations has similar characteristics. Point transformations are treated in detail and a principal series of unitary representations is constructed. (auth)

•Jan 1, 1973•3 citations
Three elementary canonical transformations are shown both to have quantum implementations as finite transformations and to generate, classically and infinitesimally, the full canonical algebra. A general canonical transformation can, in principle, be realized quantum mechanically as a product of these transformations. It is found that the intertwining of two super-Hamiltonians is equivalent to there being a canonical transformation between them. A consequence is that the procedure for solving a differential equation can be viewed as a sequence of elementary canonical transformations trivializing the super-Hamiltonian associated to the equation. It is proposed that the quantum integrability of a system is equivalent to the existence of such a sequence.
Quantum canonical transformations are defined algebraically outside of a Hilbert space context. This generalizes the quantum canonical transformations of Weyl and Dirac to include non-unitary transformations. The importance of non-unitary transformations for constructing solutions of the Schr\\"odinger equation is discussed. Three elementary canonical transformations are shown both to have quantum implementations as finite transformations and to generate, classically and infinitesimally, the full canonical algebra. A general canonical transformation can be realized quantum mechanically as a product of these transformations. Each transformation corresponds to a familiar tool used in solving differential equations, and the procedure of solving a differential equation is systematized by the use of the canonical transformations. Several examples are done to illustrate the use of the canonical transformations. [This is an extensively revised version of hep-th-9205080: the first third of the paper is new material; the notation has been simplified, and further discussion has been added to the remainder.]
Quantum canonical transformations are defined algebraically outside of a Hilbert space context. This generalizes the quantum canonical transformations of Weyl and Dirac to include non-unitary transformations. The importance of non-unitary transformations for constructing solutions of the Schrödinger equation is discussed. Three elementary canonical transformations are shown both to have quantum implementations as finite transformations and to generate, classically and infinitesimally, the full canonical algebra. A general canonical transformation can be realized quantum mechanically as a product of these transformations. Each transformation corresponds to a familiar tool used in solving differential equations, and
Owing to the operator nature of the quantum dynamical variables, classical canonical transformations for integrating the equations of motion cannot be extended to the quantum domain. In this paper, a general procedure is developed to construct the sequences of quantum canonical transformations for integrating the Schr\"odinger equations. The sequence is made of three elementary canonical transformations that constitute a much larger class than the unitary transformations. In conjunction with the procedure, we also developed a factorization technique that is analogous to the method of integration factor in classical integration. For demonstration, with the same procedure we integrate nine nontrivial models, including the centripetal barrier potential, the Kratzer's molecular potential, the Morse potential, the P\"oschl-Teller potential, the Hulth\'en potential, etc.
We test the idea that transformations which, at the classical level, can be interpreted as evolutions are represented within quantum mechanics by unitary operators. To this end, we consider non-trivial canonical transformations which leave invariant the form of the Hamilton function of a system. We demonstrate that infinite families of such transformations exist for a variety of familiar conservative systems of one degree of freedom. We show how the precise form of integral equations for the stationary state wavefunctions implied by the existence of these canonical transformations can be pinned down by exploiting the algebra of the transformations and a symmetry of their generating functions. We recover several integral equations found in the literature on standard special functions of mathematical physics. We find that when one of the classical canonical transformations we consider is non-linear, its quantum implementation is non-unitary. We end with some comments on the implications of our findings for semiclassical studies and a brief discussion relevant to string theory of the generalization to scalar field theories in 1 + 1 dimensions.
First a review is presented of the definition and properties of classical and quantum canonical transformations, from the point of view of a current program on the role of canonical transformations in quantum mechanics. The groups and the corresponding infinitesimal algebras are explored. The subgroup of point transformations (i.e. canonical transformations between pairs of conjugate observables, where one of a pair is function only of one of the other pair) is of special interest since it is a group of transformations for which classical and quantum mechanics follow each other. Only the group of inhomogeneous symplectic transformations has similar characteristics. Point transformations are treated in detail and a principal series of unitary representations is constructed. (auth)