The identification of physical degrees of freedom is sometimes obscured in the path-integral formalism, and this makes it difficult to impose some constraints or to do some approximations. I review a number of cases where the difficulty is overcome by deriving the path integral from the operator form of the partition function after such identification has been made.
The identification of physical degrees of freedom is sometimes obscured in the path-integral formalism, and this makes it difficult to impose some constraints or to do some approximations. I review a number of cases where the difficulty is overcome by deriving the path integral from the operator form of the partition function after such identification has been made.
In the first three chapters we have considered problems related to the physical behaviour of one or a few particles (or some other physical objects which can be effectively described by one or a few (quasi)particles as, e.g., the random walk model in polymer physics considered in chapter 1). Though quantum field theory describes systems with an arbitrary number of degrees of freedom (an arbitrary number of (quasi)particles), in chapter 3 we actually applied it to systems with a restricted and small number of particles (e.g., for the description of the scattering process for a few particles). Another way to express this fact is to say that in chapter 3 we have considered field theories at zero temperature. However, the majority of realistic systems contain many identical (indistinguishable) particles such as atoms, electrons, photons etc. An attempt to describe these systems in terms of the individual trajectories of all particles is absolutely hopeless. Instead, we are interested in the collective behaviour of systems and describe them in terms of partition functions, mean values, correlation functions, etc. The methods of derivation, analysis and calculation of such collective characteristics constitute the subject of classical and quantum statistical mechanics.
Path integrals are a central tool when it comes to describing quantum or thermal fluctuations of particles or fields. Their success dates back to Feynman who showed how to use them within the framework of quantum mechanics. Since then, path integrals have pervaded all areas of physics where fluctuation effects, quantum and/or thermal, are of paramount importance. Their appeal is based on the fact that one converts a problem formulated in terms of operators into one of sampling classical paths with a given weight. Path integrals are the mirror image of our conventional Riemann integrals, with functions replacing the real numbers one usually sums over. However, unlike conventional integrals, path integration suffers a serious drawback: in general, one cannot make non-linear changes of variables without committing an error of some sort. Thus, no path-integral based calculus is possible. Here we identify which are the deep mathematical reasons causing this important caveat, and we come up with cures for systems described by one degree of freedom. Our main result is a construction of path integration free of this longstanding problem.
Introduction Preliminary remarks The path integral formalism is one of the most important tools in modern theoretical physics. Integration in functional spaces was considered for the first time by Norbert Wiener in his studies of diffusion processes [60, 61]. The corresponding integration measure is now known as the Wiener measure, i.e. the so-called Gaussian path integrals were studied. In quantum mechanics, functional integrals were introduced by R. Feynmann [62, 63] who was inspired by important observations due to P. A. M. Dirac concerning a relation between wave function and classical action [64, 65]. In modern physics the path integral formalism is applied not only to developing a quantum description for systems with infinitely many degrees of freedom as, for example, in quantum field theories or condensed matter physics, but also to ordinary quantum mechanical problems. Moreover there is a tendency to reformulate standard quantum mechanical problems (such as a particle in a “box” or potential well [66, 67], or a particle in the Coulomb field [68]) within the framework of the path integral method. The reason for doing this is rather obvious: physicists develop a new mathematical tool, a new language and, in order to comprehend all of its subtleties, it is necessary to investigate as many concrete examples as possible. Use of the path integral formalism is widespread in quantum field theory because it is the most adequate mathematical tool for a wide range of problems which allows, not only for elegant formulation of problems, but also for a great deal of simplification of their theoretical analysis.
Abstract Path integrals are a central tool when it comes to describing quantum or thermal fluctuations of particles or fields. Their success dates back to Feynman who showed how to use them within the framework of quantum mechanics. Since then, path integrals have pervaded all areas of physics where fluctuation effects, quantum and/or thermal, are of paramount importance. Their appeal is based on the fact that one converts a problem formulated in terms of operators into one of sampling classical paths with a given weight. Path integrals are the mirror image of our conventional Riemann integrals, with functions replacing the real numbers one usually sums over. However, unlike conventional integrals, path integration suffers a serious drawback: in general, one cannot make non-linear changes of variables without committing an error of some sort. Thus, no path-integral based calculus is possible. Here we identify which are the deep mathematical reasons causing this important caveat, and we come up with cures for systems described by one degree of freedom. Our main result is a construction of path integration free of this longstanding problem, through a direct time-discretization procedure.
Functional integral representation of the partition functionThe customary approach to nonrelativistic many-body theory is to proceed with the method of second quantization begun in the first chapter.There is another approach, the method of functional integrals, which we shall follow here.Of course, what can be done in one formalism can always be done in another.Nevertheless, functional integrals seem to be the method of choice for most elementary particle theorists these days, and they seem to lend themselves more readily to nonperturbative phenomena such as tunneling, instantons, lattice gauge theory, etc.For gauge theories they are practically indispensable.However, there is a certain amount of formalism that must be developed before we can start to discuss physical applications.In this chapter, we shall derive the functional integral representation of the partition function for interacting relativistic non-gauge field theories.As a check on the formalism, as well as to obtain some feeling for how functional integrals work, we shall then rederive some well-known results on relativistic ideal gases for bosons and fermions.