Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:hep-lat/9605018 · Journal of Statistical Physics

Dynamic critical behavior of the Swendsen-Wang algorithm: The two-dimensional three-state Potts model revisited

Jesús Salas, Alan D. Sokal

Published Apr 1, 1997• 40 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/bf02181478

Related papers

Dynamic critical behavior of the Swendsen–Wang algorithm for the three-dimensional Ising model

Giovanni Ossola, Alan D. Sokal

arXiv:hep-lat/0402019•Nuclear Physics B•May 30, 2004•32 citations

Dynamic critical behavior of the Swendsen?Wang algorithm for the three-dimensional Ising model

Giovanni Ossola

Nuclear Physics B•May 1, 2004•3 citations

Critical dynamics of the Swendsen-Wang algorithm in the three-dimensional Ising model

Jian‐Sheng Wang

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Apr 1, 1990•42 citations

Dynamic critical behavior of a Swendsen-Wang-Type algorithm for the Ashkin-Teller model

Jesús Salas, Alan D. Sokal

arXiv:hep-lat/9511022•Journal of Statistical Physics•Nov 1, 1996•47 citations

Dynamic critical index of the Swendsen–Wang algorithm by dynamic finite-size scaling

M. Dilaver, Semra Gündüç, M. Aydın +1 more

Computer Physics Communications•Aug 25, 2006•1 citation

Dynamic and static properties of the invaded cluster algorithm

K. Moriarty, Jonathan L. Machta, L. Chayes

Simulations of the two-dimensional Ising and three-state Potts models at their critical points are performed using the invaded cluster (IC) algorithm. It is argued that observables measured on a sublattice of size l should exhibit a crossover to Swendsen-Wang (SW) behavior for l sufficiently less than the lattice size L, and a scaling form is proposed to describe the crossover phenomenon. It is found that the energy autocorrelation time ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}(l,L)$ for an $l\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}l$ sublattice attains a maximum in the crossover region, and a dynamic exponent ${z}^{\mathrm{IC}}$ for the IC algorithm is defined according to ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\varepsilon},\mathrm{max}}\ensuremath{\sim}{L}^{{z}^{\mathrm{IC}}}.$ Simulation results for the three-state model yield ${z}^{\mathrm{IC}}=0.346\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.002,$ which is smaller than values of the dynamic exponent found for the SW and Wolff algorithms and also less than the Li-Sokal bound. The results are less conclusive for the Ising model, but it appears that ${z}^{\mathrm{IC}}<0.21$ and possibly that ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\varepsilon},\mathrm{max}}\ensuremath{\sim}\mathrm{ln}L$ so that ${z}^{\mathrm{IC}}=0$---similar to previous results for the SW and Wolff algorithms.

arXiv:cond-mat/9811138•Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics•Feb 1, 1999•8 citations
Simulations of the two-dimensional Ising and three-state Potts models at their critical points are performed using the invaded cluster (IC) algorithm. It is argued that observables measured on a sublattice of size l should exhibit a crossover to Swendsen-Wang (SW) behavior for l sufficiently less than the lattice size L, and a scaling form is proposed to describe the crossover phenomenon. It is found that the energy autocorrelation time ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}(l,L)$ for an $l\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}l$ sublattice attains a maximum in the crossover region, and a dynamic exponent zIC{z}^{\mathrm{IC}}zIC for the IC algorithm is defined according to ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\varepsilon},\mathrm{max}}\ensuremath{\sim}{L}^{{z}^{\mathrm{IC}}}.$ Simulation results for the three-state model yield ${z}^{\mathrm{IC}}=0.346\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.002,$ which is smaller than values of the dynamic exponent found for the SW and Wolff algorithms and also less than the Li-Sokal bound. The results are less conclusive for the Ising model, but it appears that zIC<0.21{z}^{\mathrm{IC}}<0.21zIC<0.21 and possibly that ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\varepsilon},\mathrm{max}}\ensuremath{\sim}\mathrm{ln}L$ so that zIC=0{z}^{\mathrm{IC}}=0zIC=0---similar to previous results for the SW and Wolff algorithms.