Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:hep-lat/0301012

The Use of the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian

H. Kröger, Xiaoyu Luo, Kevin J. M. Moriarty

Published Jan 13, 2003• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In order to solve quantum field theory in a non-perturbative way, Lagrangian lattice simulations have been very successful. Here we discuss a recently proposed alternative Hamiltonian lattice formulation - the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian. In order to show its working in the case of the scalar $Φ^{4}_{1+1}$ model, we have computed thermodynamic functions like free energy, average energy, entropy and specific heat. We find good agreement between the results from the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian and standard Lagrangian lattice computations. However, the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian results show less fluctuations under variation of temperature. We address properties of the MC Hamiltonian, like a finite temperature window, and scaling properties. Also we discuss possible future applications - like quantum chaos in many-body systems, the non-perturbative computation of wave functions of elementary particles, as well as scattering amplitudes in high energy physics.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.hep-lat/0301012

Related papers

Thermodynamics from Monte Carlo Hamiltonian

Caron, L. A., H. Kröger, G. Melkonyan +2 more

We construct an effective low-energy Hamiltonian from the classical action via Monte Carlo with importance sampling. We use Monte Carlo (i) to compute matrix elements of the transition amplitude and (ii) to construct stochastically a basis. The MC Hamiltonian allows to obtain energies and wave functions of low-lying states. It allows also to compute thermodynamical observables in some temperature window (starting from temperature zero). We present examples from lattice field theory (Klein-Gordon model).

arXiv:hep-lat/0202016•Feb 11, 2002•1 citation

Monte Carlo Hamiltonian: Generalization to Quantum Field Theory

Xiang-Qian Luo, Jirari, H, Kröger, H +1 more

Monte Carlo techniques with importance sampling have been extensively applied to lattice gauge theory in the Lagrangian formulation. Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult to compute the excited states using the conventional Monte Carlo algorithm. Our recently developed approach: the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian method, has been designed to overcome the difficulties of the conventional approach. In this paper, we extend the method to many body systems and quantum field theory. The Klein-Gordon field theory is used as a testing ground. 1

•Jan 1, 2001•3 citations

MONTE CARLO HAMILTONIAN: GENERALIZATION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

XIANG-QIAN LUO, HAMZA JIRARI, HELMUT KRÖGER +1 more

Monte Carlo techniques with importance sampling have been extensively applied to lattice gauge theory in the Lagrangian formulation. Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult to compute the excited states using the conventional Monte Carlo algorithm. Our recently developed approach: the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian method, has been designed to overcome the difficulties of the conventional approach. In this paper, we extend the method to many body systems and quantum field theory. The Klein-Gordon field theory is used as a testing ground.

arXiv:hep-lat/0108026•International Workshop on Non-Perturbative Methods and Lattice QCD•Apr 1, 2001•2 citations

Quantum Monte Carlo methods

David Paul Landau, Kurt Binder

INTRODUCTION In most of the discussion presented so far in this book, the quantum character of atoms and electrons has been ignored. The Ising spin models have been an exception, but since the Ising Hamiltonian is diagonal (in the absence of a transverse magnetic field!), all energy eigenvalues are known and the Monte Carlo sampling can be carried out just as in the case of classical statistical mechanics. Furthermore, the physical properties are in accord with the third law of thermodynamics for Ising-type Hamiltonians (e.g. entropy S and specific heat vanish for temperature T → 0, etc.) in contrast to the other truly classical models dealt with in previous chapters (e.g. classical Heisenberg spin models, classical fluids and solids, etc.) which have many unphysical low temperature properties. A case in point is a classical solid for which the specific heat follows the Dulong–Petit law, C = 3 Nk B , as T → 0, and the entropy has unphysical behavior since S → −∞. Also, thermal expansion coefficients tend to non-vanishing constants for T → 0 while the third law implies that they must be zero. While the position and momentum of a particle can be specified precisely in classical mechanics, and hence the groundstate of a solid is a perfectly rigid crystal lattice (motionless particles localized at the lattice points), in reality the Heisenberg uncertainty principle forbids such a perfect rigid crystal, even at T → 0; due to zero point motions which ‘smear out’ the particles over some region around these lattice points.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 10, 2009•3 citations

Quantum Monte Carlo methods

David Paul Landau, Kurt Binder

INTRODUCTION In most of the discussion presented so far in this book, the quantum character of atoms and electrons has been ignored. The Ising spin models have been an exception, but since the Ising Hamiltonian is diagonal (in the absence of a transverse magnetic field!), all energy eigenvalues are known and the Monte Carlo sampling can be carried out just as in the case of classical statistical mechanics. Furthermore, the physical properties are in accord with the third law of thermodynamics for Ising-type Hamiltonians (e.g. entropy S and specific heat vanish for temperature T → 0, etc.) in contrast to the other truly classical models dealt with in previous chapters (e.g. classical Heisenberg spin models, classical fluids and solids, etc.) which have many unphysical low temperature properties. A case in point is a classical solid for which the specific heat follows the Dulong–Petit law, C = 3 Nk B , as T → 0, and the entropy has unphysical behavior since S → – ∞. Also, thermal expansion coefficients tend to non-vanishing constants for T → 0 while the third law implies that they must be zero. While the position and momentum of a particle can be specified precisely in classical mechanics, and hence the groundstate of a solid is a perfectly rigid crystal lattice (motionless particles localized at the lattice points), in reality the Heisenberg uncertainty principle forbids such a perfect rigid crystal, even at T → 0; due to zero point motions which ‘smear out’ the particles over some region around these lattice points.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 1, 2005•22 citations

Monte Carlo Hamiltonian: Linear Potentials

Luo Xiangqian, Liu Jin-Jiang, Chunqing Huang +2 more

We further study the validity of the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian method. The advantage of the method, in comparison with the standard Monte Carlo Lagrangian approach, is its capability to study the excited states. We consider two quantum mechanical models: a symmetric one ; and an asymmetric one , for and , for . The results for the spectrum, wave functions and thermodynamical observables are in agreement with the analytical or Runge–Kutta calculations.

arXiv:hep-th/0211077•Communications in Theoretical Physics•Nov 15, 2002•3 citations
In order to solve quantum field theory in a non-perturbative way, Lagrangian lattice simulations have been very successful. Here we discuss a recently proposed alternative Hamiltonian lattice formulation - the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian. In order to show its working in the case of the scalar Φ1+14Φ^{4}_{1+1}Φ1+14​ model, we have computed thermodynamic functions like free energy, average energy, entropy and specific heat. We find good agreement between the results from the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian and standard Lagrangian lattice computations. However, the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian results show less fluctuations under variation of temperature. We address properties of the MC Hamiltonian, like a finite temperature window, and scaling properties. Also we discuss possible future applications - like quantum chaos in many-body systems, the non-perturbative computation of wave functions of elementary particles, as well as scattering amplitudes in high energy physics.
We construct an effective low-energy Hamiltonian from the classical action via Monte Carlo with importance sampling. We use Monte Carlo (i) to compute matrix elements of the transition amplitude and (ii) to construct stochastically a basis. The MC Hamiltonian allows to obtain energies and wave functions of low-lying states. It allows also to compute thermodynamical observables in some temperature window (starting from temperature zero). We present examples from lattice field theory (Klein-Gordon model).
Monte Carlo techniques with importance sampling have been extensively applied to lattice gauge theory in the Lagrangian formulation. Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult to compute the excited states using the conventional Monte Carlo algorithm. Our recently developed approach: the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian method, has been designed to overcome the difficulties of the conventional approach. In this paper, we extend the method to many body systems and quantum field theory. The Klein-Gordon field theory is used as a testing ground. 1
Monte Carlo techniques with importance sampling have been extensively applied to lattice gauge theory in the Lagrangian formulation. Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult to compute the excited states using the conventional Monte Carlo algorithm. Our recently developed approach: the Monte Carlo Hamiltonian method, has been designed to overcome the difficulties of the conventional approach. In this paper, we extend the method to many body systems and quantum field theory. The Klein-Gordon field theory is used as a testing ground.
INTRODUCTION In most of the discussion presented so far in this book, the quantum character of atoms and electrons has been ignored. The Ising spin models have been an exception, but since the Ising Hamiltonian is diagonal (in the absence of a transverse magnetic field!), all energy eigenvalues are known and the Monte Carlo sampling can be carried out just as in the case of classical statistical mechanics. Furthermore, the physical properties are in accord with the third law of thermodynamics for Ising-type Hamiltonians (e.g. entropy S and specific heat vanish for temperature T → 0, etc.) in contrast to the other truly classical models dealt with in previous chapters (e.g. classical Heisenberg spin models, classical fluids and solids, etc.) which have many unphysical low temperature properties. A case in point is a classical solid for which the specific heat follows the Dulong–Petit law, C = 3 Nk B , as T → 0, and the entropy has unphysical behavior since S → −∞. Also, thermal expansion coefficients tend to non-vanishing constants for T → 0 while the third law implies that they must be zero. While the position and momentum of a particle can be specified precisely in classical mechanics, and hence the groundstate of a solid is a perfectly rigid crystal lattice (motionless particles localized at the lattice points), in reality the Heisenberg uncertainty principle forbids such a perfect rigid crystal, even at T → 0; due to zero point motions which ‘smear out’ the particles over some region around these lattice points.
INTRODUCTION In most of the discussion presented so far in this book, the quantum character of atoms and electrons has been ignored. The Ising spin models have been an exception, but since the Ising Hamiltonian is diagonal (in the absence of a transverse magnetic field!), all energy eigenvalues are known and the Monte Carlo sampling can be carried out just as in the case of classical statistical mechanics. Furthermore, the physical properties are in accord with the third law of thermodynamics for Ising-type Hamiltonians (e.g. entropy S and specific heat vanish for temperature T → 0, etc.) in contrast to the other truly classical models dealt with in previous chapters (e.g. classical Heisenberg spin models, classical fluids and solids, etc.) which have many unphysical low temperature properties. A case in point is a classical solid for which the specific heat follows the Dulong–Petit law, C = 3 Nk B , as T → 0, and the entropy has unphysical behavior since S → – ∞. Also, thermal expansion coefficients tend to non-vanishing constants for T → 0 while the third law implies that they must be zero. While the position and momentum of a particle can be specified precisely in classical mechanics, and hence the groundstate of a solid is a perfectly rigid crystal lattice (motionless particles localized at the lattice points), in reality the Heisenberg uncertainty principle forbids such a perfect rigid crystal, even at T → 0; due to zero point motions which ‘smear out’ the particles over some region around these lattice points.