Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:gr-qc/9411044

How and why the wave function collapses after a measurement

Massimo Fioroni, Giorgio Immirzi

Published Nov 16, 1994• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We explain the collapse of the wavefunction with the notion that, in a measurement, the system observed nucleates a first order phase transition in the measuring device. The possible final states differ by the values of macroscopic observables, and their relative phase is therefore unobservable. The process is irreversible, but needs no separate postulate.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9411044

Related papers

When is a quantum measurement?

Asher Peres

The measurement of a quantum system is not consummated until irreversible processes have destroyed all phase coherence between different possible outcomes of that measurement. It is inconsistent to assume that the wavefunction ‘‘collapses’’ before irreversibility sets in.

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1986•44 citations

The Quantum Mechanics Needs the Principle of Wave-Function Collapse—But This Principle Shouldn’t Be Misunderstood

Sofia Wechsler

The postulate of the collapse of the wave-function stands between the microscopic, quantum world, and the macroscopic world. Because of this intermediate position, the collapse process cannot be examined with the formalism of the quantum mechanics (QM), neither with that of classical mechanics. This fact makes some physicists propose interpretations of QM, which avoid this postulate. However, the common procedure used in that is making assumptions incompatible with the QM formalism. The present work discusses the most popular interpretations. It is shown that because of such assumptions those interpretations fail, i.e. predict for some experiments results which differ from the QM predictions. Despite that, special attention is called to a proposal of S. Gao, the only one which addresses and tries to solve an obvious and major contradiction. A couple of theorems are proved for showing that the collapse postulate is necessary in the QM. Although non-explainable with the quantum formalism, this postulate cannot be denied, otherwise one comes to conclusions which disagree with the QM. It is also proved here that the idea of “collapse at a distance” is problematic especially in relativistic cases, and is a misunderstanding. Namely, in an entanglement of two quantum systems, assuming that the measurement of one of the systems (accompanied by collapse of that system on one of its states) collapses the other systems, too without the second system being measured, which leads to a contradiction.

Journal of Quantum Information Science•Jan 1, 2021•8 citations

On Wave Function Collapse in Quantum Mechanics in the Case of a Spin System Having Three Anticommuting Operators: the Reason Because it is so Difficult to Realize a Theory of Collapse in Quantum Mechanics

Elio Conte

We use a two states quantum spin system S, and thus considering the particular case of three anticommuting elements and the measurement of . We evidence that, during the wave collapse, we have a transition of standard commutation relation of the spin to new commutation relations and this occurs during the interaction of the S system with the macroscopic measurement system M. The reason to accept such view point is that it causes the destruction of the interferential factors and of the fermion creation and annihilation operators of the S system without recourse to further elaborations based on the use of Hamiltonians or other methods. By this formulation we propose a new method in attempting to solve the problem of wave function collapse. The concept of Observable , in use in standard quantum mechanics, is resolved in an abstract entity to which is connected a linear hermitean operator that signs mathematically the operation that we must perform on the wave function in order to obtain the potential and possible values of the observable. It does not commute with a number of other operators characterizing the system and the non commuting rules have a fundamental role in quantum mechanics .They have a logic that must be analyzed in each phase of the non measuring and the measuring processes. When we consider the dynamics of wave function collapse we must account that the observed observable becomes a number ,with proper unity of measurements ,during the measurement, thus the linear hermitean operator to which is connected before the measurement, disappears and in its place it appears a new operator that maintain the non commutativity with the other operators to which the old and disappeared operator was connected.

•Jul 1, 2019•0 citations

Why Quantum Collapse May Not Be Fundamental

Atsushi Okamoto

Wave function collapse has long been regarded as a fundamental element of the quantum measurement process, providing a mechanism by which a superposed quantum state yields a single observed outcome. Despite its widespread use, the physical meaning of collapse remains conceptually controversial. In particular, it is often assumed that the quantities associated with a quantum state before measurement and the values obtained after measurement belong to the same conceptual category. This assumption leads naturally to the image of a discontinuous transition in which one value is selected from a superposition of possibilities. In the present work, we reexamine the concept of quantum collapse from the perspective of observability. We argue that pre-measurement quantities do not constitute observable values in the ordinary operational sense. Rather, they represent a structure of potential observability associated with possible measurement outcomes. By contrast, post-measurement outcomes correspond to operationally realized observability, in which a specific result becomes accessible through measurement. From this viewpoint, the apparent collapse does not represent a physical jump of an already existing value, but a transition from potential observability to operationally realized observability. Based on this distinction, we propose that many conceptual difficulties traditionally associated with wave function collapse arise from treating these two fundamentally different forms of observability as if they were physically equivalent. The apparent discontinuity of collapse may therefore originate not from a discontinuous change in reality itself, but from a conceptual conflation of potential observability and operationally realized observability. Within the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF), this interpretation naturally leads to the concept of accessibility transition, in which the emergence of a definite outcome is understood as a change in accessible structure rather than as a fundamental non-unitary state reduction. The present analysis suggests that wave function collapse may not be a fundamental physical phenomenon, but instead a consequence of the transition from potential observability to operationally realized observability. This perspective provides a conceptual reorganization of the measurement problem and clarifies the role of observability in the emergence of definite quantum outcomes.

•Jul 11, 2026•0 citations

Quantum field theory solves the problem of the collapse of the wave function

Alexey V. Melkikh

The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is that the quantum particle in the course of evolution, as described by the linear Schrodinger equation, exists in all of its possible states, but in measuring, the particle is always detected in only one of its states. This property is called the "collapse of the wave function" and was formulated by Von Neumann as one of the postulates of quantum mechanics. However, it remains unclear at what point in time and under what laws this transition occurs. This article demonstrates that the collapse of the wave function may be due to the creation or annihilation of particles (quasi-particles). The processes of the creation or annihilation of particles play a key role in the measurements and are described on the basis of quantum field theory. The system of equations of quantum field theory of particles and fields is non-linear; as a result, the principle of superposition does not hold for the theory. The collapse of the wave function is a consequence of this non-linearity and occurs at the moment of creation (annihilation) of a particle. This result demonstrates that the wave function collapse can occur in both microscopic and macroscopic systems. Understanding the mechanisms of the collapse of the wave function can lead to the creation of microscopic devices involved in the calculations based on quantum computing.

arXiv:1311.0205•Nov 1, 2013•4 citations

Decoding the Mystery of Wave Function Collapse

Ping Wang

We provide a reasonable explanation for measurement where no wave function in the sense of quantum mechanics is collapsed. The wave functions of the particles in the measuring device should be considered together with the measured particle as one system. The measurement is actually a physical process which makes the wave functions of different paths orthogonal. The collapsed wave function is just an equivalent one to explain certain physical phenomena. Our understanding of measurement also provides reasonable explanations for both EPR paradox and the experiments of delayed quantum eraser.

Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics•Nov 18, 2024•0 citations
We explain the collapse of the wavefunction with the notion that, in a measurement, the system observed nucleates a first order phase transition in the measuring device. The possible final states differ by the values of macroscopic observables, and their relative phase is therefore unobservable. The process is irreversible, but needs no separate postulate.
The postulate of the collapse of the wave-function stands between the microscopic, quantum world, and the macroscopic world. Because of this intermediate position, the collapse process cannot be examined with the formalism of the quantum mechanics (QM), neither with that of classical mechanics. This fact makes some physicists propose interpretations of QM, which avoid this postulate. However, the common procedure used in that is making assumptions incompatible with the QM formalism. The present work discusses the most popular interpretations. It is shown that because of such assumptions those interpretations fail, i.e. predict for some experiments results which differ from the QM predictions. Despite that, special attention is called to a proposal of S. Gao, the only one which addresses and tries to solve an obvious and major contradiction. A couple of theorems are proved for showing that the collapse postulate is necessary in the QM. Although non-explainable with the quantum formalism, this postulate cannot be denied, otherwise one comes to conclusions which disagree with the QM. It is also proved here that the idea of “collapse at a distance” is problematic especially in relativistic cases, and is a misunderstanding. Namely, in an entanglement of two quantum systems, assuming that the measurement of one of the systems (accompanied by collapse of that system on one of its states) collapses the other systems, too without the second system being measured, which leads to a contradiction.
We use a two states quantum spin system S, and thus considering the particular case of three anticommuting elements and the measurement of . We evidence that, during the wave collapse, we have a transition of standard commutation relation of the spin to new commutation relations and this occurs during the interaction of the S system with the macroscopic measurement system M. The reason to accept such view point is that it causes the destruction of the interferential factors and of the fermion creation and annihilation operators of the S system without recourse to further elaborations based on the use of Hamiltonians or other methods. By this formulation we propose a new method in attempting to solve the problem of wave function collapse. The concept of Observable , in use in standard quantum mechanics, is resolved in an abstract entity to which is connected a linear hermitean operator that signs mathematically the operation that we must perform on the wave function in order to obtain the potential and possible values of the observable. It does not commute with a number of other operators characterizing the system and the non commuting rules have a fundamental role in quantum mechanics .They have a logic that must be analyzed in each phase of the non measuring and the measuring processes. When we consider the dynamics of wave function collapse we must account that the observed observable becomes a number ,with proper unity of measurements ,during the measurement, thus the linear hermitean operator to which is connected before the measurement, disappears and in its place it appears a new operator that maintain the non commutativity with the other operators to which the old and disappeared operator was connected.
Wave function collapse has long been regarded as a fundamental element of the quantum measurement process, providing a mechanism by which a superposed quantum state yields a single observed outcome. Despite its widespread use, the physical meaning of collapse remains conceptually controversial. In particular, it is often assumed that the quantities associated with a quantum state before measurement and the values obtained after measurement belong to the same conceptual category. This assumption leads naturally to the image of a discontinuous transition in which one value is selected from a superposition of possibilities. In the present work, we reexamine the concept of quantum collapse from the perspective of observability. We argue that pre-measurement quantities do not constitute observable values in the ordinary operational sense. Rather, they represent a structure of potential observability associated with possible measurement outcomes. By contrast, post-measurement outcomes correspond to operationally realized observability, in which a specific result becomes accessible through measurement. From this viewpoint, the apparent collapse does not represent a physical jump of an already existing value, but a transition from potential observability to operationally realized observability. Based on this distinction, we propose that many conceptual difficulties traditionally associated with wave function collapse arise from treating these two fundamentally different forms of observability as if they were physically equivalent. The apparent discontinuity of collapse may therefore originate not from a discontinuous change in reality itself, but from a conceptual conflation of potential observability and operationally realized observability. Within the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF), this interpretation naturally leads to the concept of accessibility transition, in which the emergence of a definite outcome is understood as a change in accessible structure rather than as a fundamental non-unitary state reduction. The present analysis suggests that wave function collapse may not be a fundamental physical phenomenon, but instead a consequence of the transition from potential observability to operationally realized observability. This perspective provides a conceptual reorganization of the measurement problem and clarifies the role of observability in the emergence of definite quantum outcomes.
The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is that the quantum particle in the course of evolution, as described by the linear Schrodinger equation, exists in all of its possible states, but in measuring, the particle is always detected in only one of its states. This property is called the "collapse of the wave function" and was formulated by Von Neumann as one of the postulates of quantum mechanics. However, it remains unclear at what point in time and under what laws this transition occurs. This article demonstrates that the collapse of the wave function may be due to the creation or annihilation of particles (quasi-particles). The processes of the creation or annihilation of particles play a key role in the measurements and are described on the basis of quantum field theory. The system of equations of quantum field theory of particles and fields is non-linear; as a result, the principle of superposition does not hold for the theory. The collapse of the wave function is a consequence of this non-linearity and occurs at the moment of creation (annihilation) of a particle. This result demonstrates that the wave function collapse can occur in both microscopic and macroscopic systems. Understanding the mechanisms of the collapse of the wave function can lead to the creation of microscopic devices involved in the calculations based on quantum computing.
We provide a reasonable explanation for measurement where no wave function in the sense of quantum mechanics is collapsed. The wave functions of the particles in the measuring device should be considered together with the measured particle as one system. The measurement is actually a physical process which makes the wave functions of different paths orthogonal. The collapsed wave function is just an equivalent one to explain certain physical phenomena. Our understanding of measurement also provides reasonable explanations for both EPR paradox and the experiments of delayed quantum eraser.