Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cs/0603007 · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Complete Enumeration of Stopping Sets of Full-Rank Parity-Check Matrices of Hamming Codes

Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar, Jos H. Weber

Published Aug 29, 2007• 20 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Stopping sets, and in particular their numbers and sizes, play an important role in determining the performance of iterative decoders of linear codes over binary erasure channels. In the 2004 Shannon Lecture, McEliece presented an expression for the number of stopping sets of size three for a full-rank parity-check matrix of the Hamming code. In this correspondence, we derive an expression for the number of stopping sets of any given size for the same parity-check matrix.

DOI
10.1109/tit.2007.903137

Related papers

Stopping Set Enumerators of Full-Rank Parity-Check Matrices of Hamming Codes

Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar, Jos H. Weber

In the 2004 Shannon Lecture, McEliece presented an expression for the number of stopping sets of size three for a full-rank parity-check matrix of the Hamming code. In this paper, we derive an expression for the number of stopping sets of any given size for the same parity-check matrix

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jul 1, 2006•3 citations

Stopping set analysis for Hamming codes

Jos H. Weber, Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar

In the 2004 Shannon Lecture, McEliece presented an expression for the number of stopping sets of size three in a Hamming code. In this paper, we investigate how this number depends on the parity-check matrix used in the decoding process. First, we present basic results on stopping set enumerators for block codes in general. Next, we focus on stopping set enumerators for Hamming codes. Our main result is a parity-check matrix of relatively small size for which the number of stopping sets of size three equals the number of codewords of weight three in the Hamming code.

IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW)•Jan 1, 2005•28 citations

Stopping Set Distributions of Some Linear Codes

Yong Jiang, Shu‐Tao Xia, Fang‐Wei Fu

Stopping sets and stopping set distribution of an low-density parity-check code are used to determine the performance of this code under iterative decoding over a binary erasure channel (BEC). Let $C$ be a binary $[n,k]$ linear code with parity-check matrix $H$, where the rows of $H$ may be dependent. A stopping set $S$ of $C$ with parity-check matrix $H$ is a subset of column indices of $H$ such that the restriction of $H$ to $S$ does not contain a row of weight one. The stopping set distribution $\{T_i(H)\}_{i=0}^n$ enumerates the number of stopping sets with size $i$ of $C$ with parity-check matrix $H$. Note that stopping sets and stopping set distribution are related to the parity-check matrix $H$ of $C$. Let $H^{*}$ be the parity-check matrix of $C$ which is formed by all the non-zero codewords of its dual code $C^{\perp}$. A parity-check matrix $H$ is called BEC-optimal if $T_i(H)=T_i(H^*), i=0,1,..., n$ and $H$ has the smallest number of rows. On the BEC, iterative decoder of $C$ with BEC-optimal parity-check matrix is an optimal decoder with much lower decoding complexity than the exhaustive decoder. In this paper, we study stopping sets, stopping set distributions and BEC-optimal parity-check matrices of binary linear codes. Using finite geometry in combinatorics, we obtain BEC-optimal parity-check matrices and then determine the stopping set distributions for the Simplex codes, the Hamming codes, the first order Reed-Muller codes and the extended Hamming codes.

arXiv:1003.0367•Mar 1, 2010•0 citations

On the Stopping Distance and the Stopping Redundancy of Codes

Schwartz, Moshe, Alexander Vardy

It is now well known that the performance of a linear code $C$ under iterative decoding on a binary erasure channel (and other channels) is determined by the size of the smallest stopping set in the Tanner graph for $C$. Several recent papers refer to this parameter as the \emph{stopping distance} $s$ of $C$. This is somewhat of a misnomer since the size of the smallest stopping set in the Tanner graph for $C$ depends on the corresponding choice of a parity-check matrix. It is easy to see that $s \le d$, where $d$ is the minimum Hamming distance of $C$, and we show that it is always possible to choose a parity-check matrix for $C$ (with sufficiently many dependent rows) such that $s = d$. We thus introduce a new parameter, termed the \emph{stopping redundancy} of $C$, defined as the minimum number of rows in a parity-check matrix $H$ for $C$ such that the corresponding stopping distance $s(H)$ attains its largest possible value, namely $s(H) = d$. We then derive general bounds on the stopping redundancy of linear codes. We also examine several simple ways of constructing codes from other codes, and study the effect of these constructions on the stopping redundancy. Specifically, for the family of binary Reed-Muller codes (of all orders), we prove that their stopping redundancy is at most a constant times their conventional redundancy. We show that the stopping redundancies of the binary and ternary extended Golay codes are at most 35 and 22, respectively. Finally, we provide upper and lower bounds on the stopping redundancy of MDS codes.

arXiv:cs/0503058•Mar 23, 2005•0 citations

Results on Parity-Check Matrices With Optimal Stopping And/Or Dead-End Set Enumerators

Jos H. Weber, Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar

The performance of iterative decoding techniques for linear block codes correcting erasures depends very much on the sizes of the stopping sets associated with the underlying Tanner graph, or, equivalently, the parity-check matrix representing the code. In this correspondence, we introduce the notion of dead-end sets to explicitly demonstrate this dependency. The choice of the parity-check matrix entails a tradeoff between performance and complexity. We give bounds on the complexity of iterative decoders achieving optimal performance in terms of the sizes of the underlying parity-check matrices. Further, we fully characterize codes for which the optimal stopping set enumerator equals the weight enumerator.

arXiv:cs/0607024•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Feb 29, 2008•39 citations

On the stopping distance and the stopping redundancy of codes

M. Schwartz, Alexander Vardy

It is now well known that the performance of a linear code Copf under iterative decoding on a binary erasure channel (and other channels) is determined by the size of the smallest stopping set in the Tanner graph for Copf. Several recent papers refer to this parameter as the stopping distance s of Copf. This is somewhat of a misnomer since the size of the smallest stopping set in the Tanner graph for Copf depends on the corresponding choice of a parity-check matrix. It is easy to see that s les d, where d is the minimum Hamming distance of Copf, and we show that it is always possible to choose a parity-check matrix for Copf (with sufficiently many dependent rows) such that s=d. We thus introduce a new parameter, the stopping redundancy of Copf, defined as the minimum number of rows in a parity- check matrix H for Copf such that the corresponding stopping distance s(H) attains its largest possible value, namely, s(H)=d. We then derive general bounds on the stopping redundancy of linear codes. We also examine several simple ways of constructing codes from other codes, and study the effect of these constructions on the stopping redundancy. Specifically, for the family of binary Reed-Muller codes (of all orders), we prove that their stopping redundancy is at most a constant times their conventional redundancy. We show that the stopping redundancies of the binary and ternary extended Golay codes are at most 34 and 22, respectively. Finally, we provide upper and lower bounds on the stopping redundancy of MDS codes

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Mar 1, 2006•178 citations
Stopping sets, and in particular their numbers and sizes, play an important role in determining the performance of iterative decoders of linear codes over binary erasure channels. In the 2004 Shannon Lecture, McEliece presented an expression for the number of stopping sets of size three for a full-rank parity-check matrix of the Hamming code. In this correspondence, we derive an expression for the number of stopping sets of any given size for the same parity-check matrix.
In the 2004 Shannon Lecture, McEliece presented an expression for the number of stopping sets of size three in a Hamming code. In this paper, we investigate how this number depends on the parity-check matrix used in the decoding process. First, we present basic results on stopping set enumerators for block codes in general. Next, we focus on stopping set enumerators for Hamming codes. Our main result is a parity-check matrix of relatively small size for which the number of stopping sets of size three equals the number of codewords of weight three in the Hamming code.
Stopping sets and stopping set distribution of an low-density parity-check code are used to determine the performance of this code under iterative decoding over a binary erasure channel (BEC). Let CCC be a binary [n,k][n,k][n,k] linear code with parity-check matrix HHH, where the rows of HHH may be dependent. A stopping set SSS of CCC with parity-check matrix HHH is a subset of column indices of HHH such that the restriction of HHH to SSS does not contain a row of weight one. The stopping set distribution {Ti(H)}i=0n\{T_i(H)\}_{i=0}^n{Ti​(H)}i=0n​ enumerates the number of stopping sets with size iii of CCC with parity-check matrix HHH. Note that stopping sets and stopping set distribution are related to the parity-check matrix HHH of CCC. Let H∗H^{*}H∗ be the parity-check matrix of CCC which is formed by all the non-zero codewords of its dual code C⊥C^{\perp}C⊥. A parity-check matrix HHH is called BEC-optimal if Ti(H)=Ti(H∗),i=0,1,...,nT_i(H)=T_i(H^*), i=0,1,..., nTi​(H)=Ti​(H∗),i=0,1,...,n and HHH has the smallest number of rows. On the BEC, iterative decoder of CCC with BEC-optimal parity-check matrix is an optimal decoder with much lower decoding complexity than the exhaustive decoder. In this paper, we study stopping sets, stopping set distributions and BEC-optimal parity-check matrices of binary linear codes. Using finite geometry in combinatorics, we obtain BEC-optimal parity-check matrices and then determine the stopping set distributions for the Simplex codes, the Hamming codes, the first order Reed-Muller codes and the extended Hamming codes.
It is now well known that the performance of a linear code CCC under iterative decoding on a binary erasure channel (and other channels) is determined by the size of the smallest stopping set in the Tanner graph for CCC. Several recent papers refer to this parameter as the \emph{stopping distance} sss of CCC. This is somewhat of a misnomer since the size of the smallest stopping set in the Tanner graph for CCC depends on the corresponding choice of a parity-check matrix. It is easy to see that s≤ds \le ds≤d, where ddd is the minimum Hamming distance of CCC, and we show that it is always possible to choose a parity-check matrix for CCC (with sufficiently many dependent rows) such that s=ds = ds=d. We thus introduce a new parameter, termed the \emph{stopping redundancy} of CCC, defined as the minimum number of rows in a parity-check matrix HHH for CCC such that the corresponding stopping distance s(H)s(H)s(H) attains its largest possible value, namely s(H)=ds(H) = ds(H)=d. We then derive general bounds on the stopping redundancy of linear codes. We also examine several simple ways of constructing codes from other codes, and study the effect of these constructions on the stopping redundancy. Specifically, for the family of binary Reed-Muller codes (of all orders), we prove that their stopping redundancy is at most a constant times their conventional redundancy. We show that the stopping redundancies of the binary and ternary extended Golay codes are at most 35 and 22, respectively. Finally, we provide upper and lower bounds on the stopping redundancy of MDS codes.
The performance of iterative decoding techniques for linear block codes correcting erasures depends very much on the sizes of the stopping sets associated with the underlying Tanner graph, or, equivalently, the parity-check matrix representing the code. In this correspondence, we introduce the notion of dead-end sets to explicitly demonstrate this dependency. The choice of the parity-check matrix entails a tradeoff between performance and complexity. We give bounds on the complexity of iterative decoders achieving optimal performance in terms of the sizes of the underlying parity-check matrices. Further, we fully characterize codes for which the optimal stopping set enumerator equals the weight enumerator.
It is now well known that the performance of a linear code Copf under iterative decoding on a binary erasure channel (and other channels) is determined by the size of the smallest stopping set in the Tanner graph for Copf. Several recent papers refer to this parameter as the stopping distance s of Copf. This is somewhat of a misnomer since the size of the smallest stopping set in the Tanner graph for Copf depends on the corresponding choice of a parity-check matrix. It is easy to see that s les d, where d is the minimum Hamming distance of Copf, and we show that it is always possible to choose a parity-check matrix for Copf (with sufficiently many dependent rows) such that s=d. We thus introduce a new parameter, the stopping redundancy of Copf, defined as the minimum number of rows in a parity- check matrix H for Copf such that the corresponding stopping distance s(H) attains its largest possible value, namely, s(H)=d. We then derive general bounds on the stopping redundancy of linear codes. We also examine several simple ways of constructing codes from other codes, and study the effect of these constructions on the stopping redundancy. Specifically, for the family of binary Reed-Muller codes (of all orders), we prove that their stopping redundancy is at most a constant times their conventional redundancy. We show that the stopping redundancies of the binary and ternary extended Golay codes are at most 34 and 22, respectively. Finally, we provide upper and lower bounds on the stopping redundancy of MDS codes