Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cs/0201022

A theory of experiment

Albarede, Pierre

Published Jan 23, 2002• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This article aims at clarifying the language and practice of scientific experiment, mainly by hooking observability on calculability.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.cs/0201022

Related papers

Programmatic Article: Reformulating Key Concepts of Physics Without Informational Language

Alexander Yourievitch Kotelnikov

This programmatic article (zeroth in the series “Reformulating Key Concepts of Physics Without Informational Language”) outlines a systematic replacement of “informational language” by physical language. It shows that many paradoxes of modern physics — the collapsar information paradox, Landauer’s principle as “proof of the physicality of information”, the holographic principle as “the informational nature of reality”, and Wheeler’s thesis “It from Bit” (“Everything from the bit”) — arise from conflating three senses of the word “information”: configuration (physical state), observer’s knowledge (epistemic category), and pseudosubstance (metaphysical construct, to be rejected). The key distinction between the ontic (pertaining to reality itself) and the epistemic (pertaining to our knowledge) is introduced. Confusing these levels is the root of pseudo‑paradoxes. On this basis, the article proposes to reformulate eight key concepts (each covered in a separate article of the series): the collapsar pseudo‑paradox, Landauer’s principle, the holographic principle, Wheeler’s thesis, entropy as “missing information”, as well as to compile a correspondence dictionary, analyse the firewall paradox, and address the technical problem of quantum state recovery. The aim of the reformulation is to eliminate pseudo‑problems, return physics to describing matter, fields, and space‑time, and provide a practical tool (dictionary) for switching to clear physical language. The article invites the scientific community to discussion. Keywords: informational language, reformulation, ontic, epistemic, collapsar, programmatic article.

•May 20, 2026•0 citations

The philosophy of experiment

Erwin Schrödinger

Il Nuovo Cimento•Jan 1, 1955•25 citations

Mathematical Properties of Dynamic Systems and the Foundations of Quantum Theory

Eric Tesse

While it is widely acknowledged that quantum theory is strange, and that the world view it implies is elusive, there is considerably less consensus as to why this is the case. This article will explore the possibility that the theory may be opaque because the mathematical language it employs is inarticulate. To address this possibility, three interconnected mathematical theories will be developed, each specifically designed to handle aspects of quantum theory's subject matter. The first will describe dynamic systems in terms that are general enough to be applicable to any kind dynamics, including both classical and quantum. That description will then be used to construct a theory of experiments, with the aim of understanding what types of experiments scientific methodology allows. Finally, the theory of experiments will found a theory of experimental probabilities applicable to any collection of experiments, so long as their probabilities are internally consistent. The resulting over-arching mathematical language will then be applied to quantum theory. In the initial application, it will be used to explain the core nature and structure of quantum measurement and probability. Following that, it will be used to explore quantum theory's models. Like any theory written in a mathematical language, quantum theory derives its meaning from its class of models. To understand the class quantum models, two models of central importance will be described. The first will be a conceptually simple construction that follows almost immediately from the above theory of dynamics. It fully satisfies both quantum theory and the above mentioned theory of experimentation; additionally, its macroscopic objects obey classical mechanics. The second will utilize a minimal amount of mathematical structure to satisfy the same conditions.

arXiv:1106.2751•Jun 11, 2011•0 citations

A metaphysics for experiments introduction

Studies in multidisciplinarity•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Physical Language Instead of Informational Language: Terminology Correspondence (Dictionary for Reformulating Key Concepts)

Alexander Yourievitch Kotelnikov

This article presents a correspondence dictionary — a practical tool for transitioning from the tangled “informational language” to clear physical language in fundamental physics. The dictionary is based on the distinction of three senses of the word “information” introduced in Article 1 of the series: (1) configuration of a physical system (ontological), (2) observer’s knowledge (epistemic), (3) information as an independent entity (a metaphysical construct to be rejected). The dictionary covers key concepts reformulated in the previous articles of the series: the “collapsar information paradox”, Landauer’s principle, the holographic principle, Wheeler’s “Everything is information” thesis, entropy as “missing information”, and collapsar entropy. For each concept, tables are provided that replace informational formulations with physical ones. The extended dictionary includes additional terms: amount of information, quantum information, transmission, storage, processing and erasure of information, bit, and qubit. In the transitional period, it is recommended to use constructions with explanatory parentheses, for example: “configuration (information in the sense of the physical state of a system)”. The dictionary is addressed to authors of scientific articles, lecturers, students, and journal editors. Its goal is not to abolish the use of the word “information” in communication theory or quantum computing, but to offer a clear alternative where confusion of meanings creates pseudo‑problems. Keywords: dictionary, informational language, physical language, configuration, observer’s knowledge, reformulation.

•May 20, 2026•0 citations

The Theory of Experiment: Operational Definition of the Probability Space

Milton Philip Olson

The Annals of Mathematical Statistics•Apr 1, 1967•3 citations
This programmatic article (zeroth in the series “Reformulating Key Concepts of Physics Without Informational Language”) outlines a systematic replacement of “informational language” by physical language. It shows that many paradoxes of modern physics — the collapsar information paradox, Landauer’s principle as “proof of the physicality of information”, the holographic principle as “the informational nature of reality”, and Wheeler’s thesis “It from Bit” (“Everything from the bit”) — arise from conflating three senses of the word “information”: configuration (physical state), observer’s knowledge (epistemic category), and pseudosubstance (metaphysical construct, to be rejected). The key distinction between the ontic (pertaining to reality itself) and the epistemic (pertaining to our knowledge) is introduced. Confusing these levels is the root of pseudo‑paradoxes. On this basis, the article proposes to reformulate eight key concepts (each covered in a separate article of the series): the collapsar pseudo‑paradox, Landauer’s principle, the holographic principle, Wheeler’s thesis, entropy as “missing information”, as well as to compile a correspondence dictionary, analyse the firewall paradox, and address the technical problem of quantum state recovery. The aim of the reformulation is to eliminate pseudo‑problems, return physics to describing matter, fields, and space‑time, and provide a practical tool (dictionary) for switching to clear physical language. The article invites the scientific community to discussion. Keywords: informational language, reformulation, ontic, epistemic, collapsar, programmatic article.
While it is widely acknowledged that quantum theory is strange, and that the world view it implies is elusive, there is considerably less consensus as to why this is the case. This article will explore the possibility that the theory may be opaque because the mathematical language it employs is inarticulate. To address this possibility, three interconnected mathematical theories will be developed, each specifically designed to handle aspects of quantum theory's subject matter. The first will describe dynamic systems in terms that are general enough to be applicable to any kind dynamics, including both classical and quantum. That description will then be used to construct a theory of experiments, with the aim of understanding what types of experiments scientific methodology allows. Finally, the theory of experiments will found a theory of experimental probabilities applicable to any collection of experiments, so long as their probabilities are internally consistent. The resulting over-arching mathematical language will then be applied to quantum theory. In the initial application, it will be used to explain the core nature and structure of quantum measurement and probability. Following that, it will be used to explore quantum theory's models. Like any theory written in a mathematical language, quantum theory derives its meaning from its class of models. To understand the class quantum models, two models of central importance will be described. The first will be a conceptually simple construction that follows almost immediately from the above theory of dynamics. It fully satisfies both quantum theory and the above mentioned theory of experimentation; additionally, its macroscopic objects obey classical mechanics. The second will utilize a minimal amount of mathematical structure to satisfy the same conditions.
This article presents a correspondence dictionary — a practical tool for transitioning from the tangled “informational language” to clear physical language in fundamental physics. The dictionary is based on the distinction of three senses of the word “information” introduced in Article 1 of the series: (1) configuration of a physical system (ontological), (2) observer’s knowledge (epistemic), (3) information as an independent entity (a metaphysical construct to be rejected). The dictionary covers key concepts reformulated in the previous articles of the series: the “collapsar information paradox”, Landauer’s principle, the holographic principle, Wheeler’s “Everything is information” thesis, entropy as “missing information”, and collapsar entropy. For each concept, tables are provided that replace informational formulations with physical ones. The extended dictionary includes additional terms: amount of information, quantum information, transmission, storage, processing and erasure of information, bit, and qubit. In the transitional period, it is recommended to use constructions with explanatory parentheses, for example: “configuration (information in the sense of the physical state of a system)”. The dictionary is addressed to authors of scientific articles, lecturers, students, and journal editors. Its goal is not to abolish the use of the word “information” in communication theory or quantum computing, but to offer a clear alternative where confusion of meanings creates pseudo‑problems. Keywords: dictionary, informational language, physical language, configuration, observer’s knowledge, reformulation.