Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/9908262 · Springer eBooks

An Introduction to Bosonization

David Sénéchal

Published May 8, 2006• 61 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/0-387-21717-7_4

Related papers

A general approach to bosonization

Girish S. Setlur, V. Meera

arXiv:cond-mat/0701317•Pramana•Oct 1, 2007•1 citation

Supercoherent States—An Introduction

Didier Robert, Monique Combescure

In previous Chapters we have considered coherent states systems for bosons and for fermions separately. Here we introduce super-spaces where it is possible to consider simultaneously bosons and fermions. Our aim is to give a short introduction to this deep and difficult subject by considering some elementary examples where coherent states and quantization are involved.

Theoretical and mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Bosonization

Michael Stone

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Dec 1, 1994•75 citations

The formation of coherent structures in strongly interacting q-boson systems

Jack A. Tuszyński, M. Kibler

The authors combine two developments in the areas of mathematical physics and many body systems. The first is the introduction of systems of q-bosons in connection with the study of quantum groups. The second is the formulation of nonlinear dynamics for interacting many-particle systems. They demonstrate the role of quantum groups via the introduction of interacting q-bosons. A number of interesting properties emerge which involve dissipative nonlinear dynamics, bifurcation effects and transitions between localized and extended states.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•May 7, 1992•3 citations

Geometry

FRANCESCO IACHELLO, P. Van Isacker

Introduction Every algebraic structure has associated with it geometric structures. The choice of the geometric structure with which it is most convenient to visualize the situation depends on the physics that one wishes to expose. For boson systems of the type discussed in Volume 1 and also for those used in the description of molecules (Iachello and Levine, 1982), there is a very natural geometric structure provided by the coset space U( n )/U( n – 1)⊗ U(1). This leads in the case of nuclei to a description in terms of five variables, α μ (μ = 0, ±1, ±2), which can then be associated with the shape of a liquid drop with quadrupole deformation (Bohr and Mottelson, 1975). Similarly, in molecules, use of the coset space mentioned above leads to a description in terms of three variables, r μ (μ = 0, ±l), which can be associated with the vector distance between the two atoms in the molecule. For fermionic systems or when bosons and fermions coexist, the introduction of a geometric space is not so obvious. One can, if one wishes, introduce coset spaces, as briefly discussed in the following section, but even with this introduction, the geometric structure of the problem remains as abstract as before. A simpler situation arises if one is interested only in the case of a single fermion coupled to a system of bosons. In this case one can analyze the algebraic structure in terms of the motion of a single particle in a potential well generated by the bosons.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 30, 1991•0 citations

Bosonization

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 1994•29 citations
The authors combine two developments in the areas of mathematical physics and many body systems. The first is the introduction of systems of q-bosons in connection with the study of quantum groups. The second is the formulation of nonlinear dynamics for interacting many-particle systems. They demonstrate the role of quantum groups via the introduction of interacting q-bosons. A number of interesting properties emerge which involve dissipative nonlinear dynamics, bifurcation effects and transitions between localized and extended states.
Introduction Every algebraic structure has associated with it geometric structures. The choice of the geometric structure with which it is most convenient to visualize the situation depends on the physics that one wishes to expose. For boson systems of the type discussed in Volume 1 and also for those used in the description of molecules (Iachello and Levine, 1982), there is a very natural geometric structure provided by the coset space U( n )/U( n – 1)⊗ U(1). This leads in the case of nuclei to a description in terms of five variables, α μ (μ = 0, ±1, ±2), which can then be associated with the shape of a liquid drop with quadrupole deformation (Bohr and Mottelson, 1975). Similarly, in molecules, use of the coset space mentioned above leads to a description in terms of three variables, r μ (μ = 0, ±l), which can be associated with the vector distance between the two atoms in the molecule. For fermionic systems or when bosons and fermions coexist, the introduction of a geometric space is not so obvious. One can, if one wishes, introduce coset spaces, as briefly discussed in the following section, but even with this introduction, the geometric structure of the problem remains as abstract as before. A simpler situation arises if one is interested only in the case of a single fermion coupled to a system of bosons. In this case one can analyze the algebraic structure in terms of the motion of a single particle in a potential well generated by the bosons.