Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/9708197 · Physics Letters A

Low-lying excitations in the S = 1 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain

Shoji Yamamoto, Seiji Miyashita

Published Nov 1, 1997• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(97)00662-2

Related papers

Spectral weight of low-lying excitations in the one-dimensional spin 1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet

J. C. Bonner, Bill Sutherland, Peter M. Richards

Conference on Multimedia Modeling•Jan 1, 1974•0 citations

Ground state and low-lying excitations in the Heisenberg XXZ chain of arbitrary spin S

Kiyoshi Sogo

Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 1984•80 citations

Spin-correlations and low lying excited states of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a square lattice

Peter Horsch, Wolfgang von der Linden

Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter•Jun 1, 1988•131 citations

The picture of low-lying excitations in the isotropic Heisenberg chain of arbitrary spins

Leon A. Takhtajan

Physics Letters A•Feb 1, 1982•550 citations

Multispinon excitations in the spin S = 1/2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model

Yu-Liang Liu

With the commutation relations of the spin operators, we first write out the equations of motion of the spin susceptibility and related correlation functions that have a hierarchical structure, then under the “soft cut-off” approximation, we give a set of equations of motion of spin susceptibilities for a spin [Formula: see text] antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model that is independent of whether or not the system has a long-range order in the low energy/temperature limit. Applying for a chain, a square lattice and a honeycomb lattice, respectively, we obtain the upper and the lowest boundaries of the low-lying excitations by solving this set of equations. For a chain, the upper and the lowest boundaries of the low-lying excitations are the same as that of the exact ones obtained by the Bethe ansatz, where the elementary excitations are the spinon pairs. For a square lattice, the spin wave excitation (magnons) resides in the region close to the lowest boundary of the low-lying excitations, and the multispinon excitations take place in the high-energy region close to the upper boundary of the low-lying excitations. For a honeycomb lattice, we have one kind of “mode” of the low-lying excitation. The present results obey the Lieb–Schultz–Mattis theorem, and they are also consistent with recent neutron scattering observations and numerical simulations for a square lattice.

arXiv:2008.09974•International Journal of Modern Physics B•Feb 3, 2021•3 citations

Excitations in the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain

András Sütö

Solid State Communications•Nov 1, 1976•5 citations
With the commutation relations of the spin operators, we first write out the equations of motion of the spin susceptibility and related correlation functions that have a hierarchical structure, then under the “soft cut-off” approximation, we give a set of equations of motion of spin susceptibilities for a spin [Formula: see text] antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model that is independent of whether or not the system has a long-range order in the low energy/temperature limit. Applying for a chain, a square lattice and a honeycomb lattice, respectively, we obtain the upper and the lowest boundaries of the low-lying excitations by solving this set of equations. For a chain, the upper and the lowest boundaries of the low-lying excitations are the same as that of the exact ones obtained by the Bethe ansatz, where the elementary excitations are the spinon pairs. For a square lattice, the spin wave excitation (magnons) resides in the region close to the lowest boundary of the low-lying excitations, and the multispinon excitations take place in the high-energy region close to the upper boundary of the low-lying excitations. For a honeycomb lattice, we have one kind of “mode” of the low-lying excitation. The present results obey the Lieb–Schultz–Mattis theorem, and they are also consistent with recent neutron scattering observations and numerical simulations for a square lattice.