Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0605118 · Physical Review B

Deconfined quantum criticality in the two-dimensional antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model with next-nearest-neighbor Ising exchange

J. Hove, Asle Sudbø

Published Mar 9, 2007• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We have considered the $S=1∕2$ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model in two dimensions, with an additional Ising next-nearest-neighbor interaction. Antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interactions will lead to frustration, and the system responds with flipping the spins down in the $xy$ plane. For large next-nearest-neighbor coupling the system will order in a striped phase along the $z$ axis, this phase is reached through a first-order transition. We have considered two generalizations of this model, one with random next-nearest-neighbor interactions, and one with an enlarged unit cell, where only half of the atoms have next-nearest-neighbor interactions. In both cases the transition is softened to a second-order transition separating two ordered states. In the latter case we have estimated the quantum critical exponent $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\approx}0.25$. These two cases then represent candidate examples of deconfined quantum criticality.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.75.104405

Related papers

Deconfined Criticality in the Frustrated Heisenberg Honeycomb Antiferromagnet

R. Ganesh, Jeroen van den Brink, Satoshi Nishimoto

Using the density matrix renormalization group, we determine the phase diagram of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a honeycomb lattice with a nearest-neighbor interaction J(1) and a frustrating, next-nearest-neighbor exchange J(2). As frustration increases, the ground state exhibits Néel, plaquette, and dimer orders, with critical points at J(2)/J(1) = 0.22 and 0.35. We observe that both the spin gap and the corresponding order parameters vanish continuously at both the critical points, indicating the presence of deconfined quantum criticality.

arXiv:1301.0853•Physical Review Letters•Mar 18, 2013•108 citations

Quantum phase transition in the three-dimensional anisotropic frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnetic model

J. Roberto Viana, J. Ricardo de Sousa, M. A. Contínentino

The phase diagram of the anisotropic quantum spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet in the presence of competitive nearest $({J}_{1})$- and next-nearest $({J}_{2}=\ensuremath{\alpha}{J}_{1})$-neighbor interactions on a simple cubic lattice is studied within the framework of the differential operator technique. The Hamiltonian is solved by using an effective-field theory in a two-spin cluster. We propose a function for the free energy, which is similar to the Landau expansion, in order to find the ground state $(T=0)$ and the finite-$T$ phase diagram. At zero temperature, we find a first-order quantum phase transition in the point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ between the antiferromagnetic (AF) and superantiferromagnetic (SAF) phases. This is dependent on the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ ($\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$ and 1 correspond to the isotropic Heisenberg and Ising models, respectively). The quantum critical values of ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\ne}1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are smaller than those of the classical model ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}=1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{c}=1/4$ (for example, for $\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$, we find ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(0)=0.21$). The former monotonically increases with the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$. The phase diagram in $T\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\alpha}$ plane presents a second-order transition at ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ between the AF and paramagnetic (P) phases. The phase transition between the SAF and P phases is of first-order ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ for all values of $\ensuremath{\Delta}∊[0,1]$. The phase transition lines ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ and ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ merge in a critical end point (CEP) that is dependent on $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ [i.e., ${T}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ and ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are the temperature and frustration parameters at the CEP]. The ordered phases (AF and SAF) are separated by first-order transitions and exhibit a nontrivial re-entrant behavior at low temperatures.

Physical Review B•May 27, 2008•24 citations

Phase diagrams and critical behavior in Ising square lattices with nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor interactions

Kurt Binder, David Paul Landau

The phase diagrams of Ising antiferromagnets in a magnetic field $H$ are investigated for various values of the ratio $R$ between nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor interaction. While meanfield approximations and the existing real-space renormalization-group treatments yield phase diagrams which are sometimes even qualitatively incorrect, accurate results are obtained from Monte Carlo calculations. For $R<0$ only an antiferromagnetically ordered phase exists. Its transition to the disordered phase is first order for temperatures below the tricritical point (${T}_{t}$,${H}_{t}$). For $R\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ also ${T}_{t}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. For $R=0$ we find very good agreement with the results of M\"uller-Hartmann and Zittartz. For $R>0$ and ${H}_{1}<H<{H}_{2}$ a new phase with anomalous high ground-state degeneracy is found (two sublattices have only one-dimensional order). These sublattices undergo order-disorder transitions at $T=0$, such that for $T>0$ one is left with a "superantiferromagnetic" phase. At low temperatures in this phase a pronounced tendency is observed to form a simpler (2 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} 2) superstructure but with many antiphase domain boundaries. For $R\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\frac{1}{2}$ and $H<{H}_{1}$ the regime of the antiferromagnetic phases goes to zero temperature, while for $R>\frac{1}{2}$ the superantiferromagnetic phase exists also for $H<{H}_{1}$. The order-disorder transition associated with this phase seems to have non-Ising critical exponents which vary as a function of $R$ and $H$. Estimates for the exponents lead us to suggest that Suzuki's "weak universality" is valid. The behavior of the model at $T=0$ is related to known results on hard-core lattice gases. It is shown that it is useful to interpret the transitions at $T=0$ as generalized percolation transitions. Since the model may have applications to adsorbate phases in registered structures at (100) surfaces of cubic crystals, the transcription of our results to temperature-coverage phase diagrams and adsorption isotherms is discussed in detail, and possible experimental applications are mentioned.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Mar 1, 1980•442 citations

Two-dimensional quantum spin- 12 Heisenberg model with competing interactions

J. Ricardo de Sousa, N. S. Branco

We study the quantum spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ Heisenberg model in two dimensions, interacting through a nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange $(J)$ and a ferromagnetic dipolarlike interaction $({J}_{d})$, using double-time Green's function, decoupled within the random phase approximation. We obtain the dependence of ${k}_{B}{T}_{c}∕{J}_{d}$ as a function of frustration parameter $\ensuremath{\delta}$, where ${T}_{c}$ is the ferromagnetic (F) transition temperature and $\ensuremath{\delta}$ is the ratio between the strengths of the exchange and dipolar interaction (i.e., $\ensuremath{\delta}=J∕{J}_{d}$). The transition temperature between the F and paramagnetic phases decreases with $\ensuremath{\delta}$, as expected, but goes to zero at a finite value of this parameter, namely, $\ensuremath{\delta}={\ensuremath{\delta}}_{c}=\ensuremath{\pi}∕8$. At $T=0$ (quantum phase transition), we analyze the critical parameter ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{c}(p)$ for the general case of an exchange interaction in the form ${J}_{ij}={J}_{d}∕{r}_{ij}^{p}$, where ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic phases are present.

arXiv:cond-mat/0511606•Physical Review B•Oct 21, 2005•11 citations

Phase transitions and critical properties of the frustrated Heisenberg model on a layer triangular lattice with next-to-nearest-neighbor interactions

Akai Kurbanovich Murtazaev, Рамазанов Магомедшейх Курбанович, V. K. Badiev

The critical behavior of the three-dimensional antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model with nearest-neighbor (J) and next-to-nearest-neighbor (J 1) interactions is studied by the replica Monte Carlo method. The first-order phase transition and pseudouniversal critical behavior of this model are established for a small lattice in the interval R = |J 1/J| = 0–0.115. A complete set of the main static magnetic and chiral critical indices is calculated in this interval using the finite-dimensional scaling theory.

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics•Aug 1, 2012•13 citations

Two-dimensional frustrated Heisenberg model: Variational study

Д. В. Дмитриев, V. Ya. Krivnov, А. А. Овчинников

The stability of the ferromagnetic phase of the two-dimensional (2D) quantum spin-1/2 model with nearest-neighbor ferro- and next-nearest neighbor antiferromagnetic interactions is studied. It turns out that values of exchange integrals at which the ferromagnetic state becomes unstable with respect to a creation of one and two magnons are different. This difference shows that the classical approximation is inapplicable to the study of the transition from the ferromagnetic to the singlet state in contrast with 1D case. This problem is investigated using a variational function. It is based on the boson representation of spin operators which is different from the Holstein-Primakoff approximation. This allows us to obtain an accurate estimate of the transition point and to study the character of the phase transition.

arXiv:cond-mat/9911491•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Feb 1, 1997•14 citations
We have considered the S=1∕2S=1∕2S=1∕2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model in two dimensions, with an additional Ising next-nearest-neighbor interaction. Antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interactions will lead to frustration, and the system responds with flipping the spins down in the xyxyxy plane. For large next-nearest-neighbor coupling the system will order in a striped phase along the zzz axis, this phase is reached through a first-order transition. We have considered two generalizations of this model, one with random next-nearest-neighbor interactions, and one with an enlarged unit cell, where only half of the atoms have next-nearest-neighbor interactions. In both cases the transition is softened to a second-order transition separating two ordered states. In the latter case we have estimated the quantum critical exponent \ensuremathβ\ensuremath≈0.25\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\approx}0.25\ensuremathβ\ensuremath≈0.25. These two cases then represent candidate examples of deconfined quantum criticality.
Using the density matrix renormalization group, we determine the phase diagram of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a honeycomb lattice with a nearest-neighbor interaction J(1) and a frustrating, next-nearest-neighbor exchange J(2). As frustration increases, the ground state exhibits Néel, plaquette, and dimer orders, with critical points at J(2)/J(1) = 0.22 and 0.35. We observe that both the spin gap and the corresponding order parameters vanish continuously at both the critical points, indicating the presence of deconfined quantum criticality.
The phase diagram of the anisotropic quantum spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet in the presence of competitive nearest (J1)({J}_{1})(J1​)- and next-nearest $({J}_{2}=\ensuremath{\alpha}{J}_{1})$-neighbor interactions on a simple cubic lattice is studied within the framework of the differential operator technique. The Hamiltonian is solved by using an effective-field theory in a two-spin cluster. We propose a function for the free energy, which is similar to the Landau expansion, in order to find the ground state (T=0)(T=0)(T=0) and the finite-TTT phase diagram. At zero temperature, we find a first-order quantum phase transition in the point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ between the antiferromagnetic (AF) and superantiferromagnetic (SAF) phases. This is dependent on the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ ($\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$ and 1 correspond to the isotropic Heisenberg and Ising models, respectively). The quantum critical values of ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\ne}1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are smaller than those of the classical model ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}=1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{c}=1/4$ (for example, for $\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$, we find ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(0)=0.21$). The former monotonically increases with the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$. The phase diagram in $T\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\alpha}$ plane presents a second-order transition at ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ between the AF and paramagnetic (P) phases. The phase transition between the SAF and P phases is of first-order ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ for all values of $\ensuremath{\Delta}∊[0,1]$. The phase transition lines ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ and ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ merge in a critical end point (CEP) that is dependent on $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ [i.e., ${T}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ and ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are the temperature and frustration parameters at the CEP]. The ordered phases (AF and SAF) are separated by first-order transitions and exhibit a nontrivial re-entrant behavior at low temperatures.
The phase diagrams of Ising antiferromagnets in a magnetic field HHH are investigated for various values of the ratio RRR between nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor interaction. While meanfield approximations and the existing real-space renormalization-group treatments yield phase diagrams which are sometimes even qualitatively incorrect, accurate results are obtained from Monte Carlo calculations. For R<0R<0R<0 only an antiferromagnetically ordered phase exists. Its transition to the disordered phase is first order for temperatures below the tricritical point (Tt{T}_{t}Tt​,Ht{H}_{t}Ht​). For $R\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ also ${T}_{t}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. For R=0R=0R=0 we find very good agreement with the results of M\"uller-Hartmann and Zittartz. For R>0R>0R>0 and H1<H<H2{H}_{1}<H<{H}_{2}H1​<H<H2​ a new phase with anomalous high ground-state degeneracy is found (two sublattices have only one-dimensional order). These sublattices undergo order-disorder transitions at T=0T=0T=0, such that for T>0T>0T>0 one is left with a "superantiferromagnetic" phase. At low temperatures in this phase a pronounced tendency is observed to form a simpler (2 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} 2) superstructure but with many antiphase domain boundaries. For $R\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\frac{1}{2}$ and H<H1H<{H}_{1}H<H1​ the regime of the antiferromagnetic phases goes to zero temperature, while for R>12R>\frac{1}{2}R>21​ the superantiferromagnetic phase exists also for H<H1H<{H}_{1}H<H1​. The order-disorder transition associated with this phase seems to have non-Ising critical exponents which vary as a function of RRR and HHH. Estimates for the exponents lead us to suggest that Suzuki's "weak universality" is valid. The behavior of the model at T=0T=0T=0 is related to known results on hard-core lattice gases. It is shown that it is useful to interpret the transitions at T=0T=0T=0 as generalized percolation transitions. Since the model may have applications to adsorbate phases in registered structures at (100) surfaces of cubic crystals, the transcription of our results to temperature-coverage phase diagrams and adsorption isotherms is discussed in detail, and possible experimental applications are mentioned.
We study the quantum spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ Heisenberg model in two dimensions, interacting through a nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange (J)(J)(J) and a ferromagnetic dipolarlike interaction (Jd)({J}_{d})(Jd​), using double-time Green's function, decoupled within the random phase approximation. We obtain the dependence of kBTc∕Jd{k}_{B}{T}_{c}∕{J}_{d}kB​Tc​∕Jd​ as a function of frustration parameter $\ensuremath{\delta}$, where Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ is the ferromagnetic (F) transition temperature and $\ensuremath{\delta}$ is the ratio between the strengths of the exchange and dipolar interaction (i.e., $\ensuremath{\delta}=J∕{J}_{d}$). The transition temperature between the F and paramagnetic phases decreases with $\ensuremath{\delta}$, as expected, but goes to zero at a finite value of this parameter, namely, $\ensuremath{\delta}={\ensuremath{\delta}}_{c}=\ensuremath{\pi}∕8$. At T=0T=0T=0 (quantum phase transition), we analyze the critical parameter ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{c}(p)$ for the general case of an exchange interaction in the form Jij=Jd∕rijp{J}_{ij}={J}_{d}∕{r}_{ij}^{p}Jij​=Jd​∕rijp​, where ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic phases are present.
The critical behavior of the three-dimensional antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model with nearest-neighbor (J) and next-to-nearest-neighbor (J 1) interactions is studied by the replica Monte Carlo method. The first-order phase transition and pseudouniversal critical behavior of this model are established for a small lattice in the interval R = |J 1/J| = 0–0.115. A complete set of the main static magnetic and chiral critical indices is calculated in this interval using the finite-dimensional scaling theory.
The stability of the ferromagnetic phase of the two-dimensional (2D) quantum spin-1/2 model with nearest-neighbor ferro- and next-nearest neighbor antiferromagnetic interactions is studied. It turns out that values of exchange integrals at which the ferromagnetic state becomes unstable with respect to a creation of one and two magnons are different. This difference shows that the classical approximation is inapplicable to the study of the transition from the ferromagnetic to the singlet state in contrast with 1D case. This problem is investigated using a variational function. It is based on the boson representation of spin operators which is different from the Holstein-Primakoff approximation. This allows us to obtain an accurate estimate of the transition point and to study the character of the phase transition.