We show that, in the presence of a complex spectrum, antiresonances act as a precursor for dephasing enabling the crossover to a fully decoherent transport even within a unitary Hamiltonian description. This general scenario is illustrated here by focusing on a quantum dot coupled to a chaotic cavity containing a finite, but large, number of states using a Hamiltonian formulation. For weak coupling to a chaotic cavity with a sufficiently dense spectrum, the ensuing complex structure of resonances and antiresonances leads to phase randomization under coarse graining in energy. Such phase instabilities and coarse graining are the ingredients for a mechanism producing decoherence and thus irreversibility. For the present simple model one finds a conductance that coincides with the one obtained by adding a ficticious voltage probe within the Landauer-Büttiker picture. This sheds new light on how the microscopic mechanisms that produce phase fluctuations induce decoherence.
We show that, in the presence of a complex spectrum, antiresonances act as a precursor for dephasing enabling the crossover to a fully decoherent transport even within a unitary Hamiltonian description. This general scenario is illustrated here by focusing on a quantum dot coupled to a chaotic cavity containing a finite, but large, number of states using a Hamiltonian formulation. For weak coupling to a chaotic cavity with a sufficiently dense spectrum, the ensuing complex structure of resonances and antiresonances leads to phase randomization under coarse graining in energy. Such phase instabilities and coarse graining are the ingredients for a mechanism producing decoherence and thus irreversibility. For the present simple model one finds a conductance that coincides with the one obtained by adding a ficticious voltage probe within the Landauer-Büttiker picture. This sheds new light on how the microscopic mechanisms that produce phase fluctuations induce decoherence.
We show that, in the presence of a complex spectrum, antiresonances act as a precursor for dephasing enabling the crossover to a fully decoherent transport even within a unitary Hamiltonian description. This general scenario is illustrated here by focusing on a quantum dot coupled to a chaotic cavity containing a finite, but large, number of states using a Hamiltonian formulation. For weak coupling to a chaotic cavity with a sufficiently dense spectrum, the ensuing complex structure of resonances and antiresonances leads to phase randomization under coarse graining in energy. Such phase instabilities and coarse graining are the ingredients for a mechanism producing decoherence and thus irreversibility. For the present simple model one finds a conductance that coincides with the one obtained by adding a ficticious voltage probe within the Landauer-Büttiker picture. This sheds new light on how the microscopic mechanisms that produce phase fluctuations induce decoherence.
We study a finite-resolution route to decoherence-like behavior in quantum systems whose classical limit is chaotic. The mechanism does not require tracing over an external environment, adding phenomenological noise, or changing unitary quantum mechanics. Instead, chaotic phase-space transport drives Wigner-function interference fringes to progressively shorter wavelengths, while any observation, reconstruction, or deliberately coarse description has finite phase-space resolution. Modeling that resolution by Gaussian coarse-graining, we show that interference components transported below the resolution scale are exponentially attenuated in the coarse-grained phase-space description. The exact quantum state remains pure under unitary evolution; the suppression is, therefore, operational rather than objective. In the semiclassical pre-Ehrenfest window, the instability scale is set by finite-time Lyapunov exponents, while the dimensionless suppression factor is determined by the initial fringe geometry and the coarse-graining covariance. The same geometry gives a robustness criterion: interference components with strong projection onto covector-expanding Oseledets directions are suppressed first, while components avoiding those directions remain visible longer. A hyperbolic cat-map example illustrates the mechanism explicitly. We state the regime of validity, distinguish the mechanism from environment-induced decoherence, and give a practical extraction procedure for numerical or experimental tests.
We investigate the effect of dephasing (decoherence) on quantum transport through open chaotic ballistic conductors in the semiclassical limit of small Fermi wavelength to system size ratio, ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{F}∕L⪡1$. We use the trajectory-based semiclassical theory to study a two-terminal chaotic dot with decoherence originating from (i) an external closed quantum chaotic environment, (ii) a classical source of noise, and (iii) a voltage probe, i.e., an additional current-conserving terminal. We focus on the pure dephasing regime, where the coupling to the external source of dephasing is so weak that it does not induce energy relaxation. In addition to the universal algebraic suppression of weak localization, we find an exponential suppression of weak localization $\ensuremath{\propto}\mathrm{exp}[\ensuremath{-}\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{\ensuremath{\tau}}∕{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}]$, with the dephasing rate ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$. The parameter $\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{\ensuremath{\tau}}$ depends strongly on the source of dephasing. For a voltage probe, $\stackrel{\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{\ensuremath{\tau}}$ is of order the Ehrenfest time $\ensuremath{\propto}\mathrm{ln}[L∕{\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{F}]$. In contrast, for a chaotic environment or a classical source of noise, it has the correlation length $\ensuremath{\xi}$ of the coupling or noise potential replacing the Fermi wavelength ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{F}$. We explicitly show that the Fano factor for shot noise is unaffected by decoherence. We connect these results to earlier works on dephasing due to electron-electron interactions and numerically confirm our findings.
As an alternative to Büttiker's dephasing lead model, we examine a dephasing stub . Both models are phenomenological ways to introduce decoherence in chaotic scattering by a quantum dot. The difference is that the dephasing lead opens up the quantum dot by connecting it to an electron reservoir, while the dephasing stub is closed at one end. Voltage fluctuations in the stub take over the dephasing role from the reservoir. Because the quantum dot with dephasing lead is an open system, only expectation values of the current can be forced to vanish at low frequencies, while the outcome of an individual measurement is not so constrained. The quantum dot with dephasing stub, in contrast, remains a closed system with a vanishing low-frequency current at each and every measurement. This difference is a crucial one in the context of quantum algorithms, which are based on the outcome of individual measurements rather than on expectation values. We demonstrate that the dephasing stub model has a parameter range in which the voltage fluctuations are sufficiently strong to suppress quantum interference effects, while still being sufficiently weak that classical current fluctuations can be neglected relative to the nonequilibrium shot noise.
This preprint develops a reduced dynamical description derived from a previously introduced variational dissipative–conservative PDE framework. Starting from a coupled system consisting of a unitary oscillatory field and a dissipative auxiliary field generated by a single free-energy functional, we show how effective decoherence arises when the auxiliary degrees of freedom are coarse-grained. The full system preserves unitary Hamiltonian evolution in the oscillatory sector, while non-unitary behaviour appears only at the reduced level through irreversible coupling. No collapse postulate, stochastic terms, or modification of quantum mechanics is introduced. The work focuses exclusively on decoherence and effective localisation as emergent phenomena within the variational framework and is intended as a companion to the foundational PDE formulation.
Abstract. As an alternative to Büttiker’s dephasing lead model, we examine a dephasing stub. Both models are phenomenological ways to introduce decoherence in chaotic scattering by a quantum dot. The difference is that the dephasing lead opens up the quantum dot by connecting it to an electron reservoir, while the dephasing stub is closed at one end. Voltage fluctuations in the stub take over the dephasing role from the reservoir. Because the quantum dot with dephasing lead is an open system, only expectation values of the current can be forced to vanish at low frequencies, while the outcome of an individual measurement is not so constrained. The quantum dot with dephasing stub, in contrast, remains a closed system with a vanishing low-frequency current at each and every measurement. This difference is a crucial one in the context of quantum algorithms, which are based on the outcome of individual measurements rather than on expectation values. We demonstrate that the dephasing stub model has a parameter range in which the voltage fluctuations are sufficiently strong to suppress quantum interference effects, while still being sufficiently weak that classical current fluctuations can be neglected relative to the nonequilibrium shot noise.