Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0506167 · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry

Spin‐density functional theory: Some open problems and application to inhomogeneous Heisenberg models

K. Capelle, Valter L. Líbero

Published Jan 1, 2005• 19 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract Spin‐density functional theory (SDFT) is the most widely implemented and applied formulation of density functional theory. However, it is still finding novel applications, and occasionally encounters unexpected problems. In this article, we first briefly describe a few of the latter, related to issues such as nonuniqueness, noncollinearity, and currents. We then turn to an example of the former, namely SDFT for the Heisenberg model. It is shown that time‐honored concepts of Coulomb DFT, such as the local‐density approximation, can be applied to this (and other) model Hamiltonians, as well, once the concept of “density” has been suitably reinterpreted. Local‐density‐type approximations for the inhomogeneous Heisenberg model are constructed. Numerical applications to finite‐size and impurity systems demonstrate that DFT is a computationally efficient and reasonably accurate alternative to conventional methods of statistical mechanics for the Heisenberg model. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2005

DOI
10.1002/qua.20740

Related papers

Density functional formulations for quantum chains

Francisco Castilho Alcaraz, Klaus Capelle

We show that a lattice formulation of density functional theory (DFT), guided by renormalization-group concepts, can be used to obtain numerical predictions of energy gaps, spin-density profiles, critical exponents, sound velocities, surface energies, and conformal anomalies of spatially inhomogeneous quantum-spin chains. To this end, we (i) cast the formalism of DFT in the notation of quantum-spin chains to make the powerful methods and concepts developed in ab initio DFT available to workers in this field, (ii) explore to what extent simple local approximations in the spirit of the local-density approximation (LDA) can be used to predict critical exponents and conformal anomalies of quantum-spin models, and (iii) propose and explore various nonlocal approximations depending on the size of the system or on its average density in addition to the local density. These nonlocal functionals turn out to be superior to LDA functionals.

arXiv:cond-mat/0702080•Physical Review B•Jul 12, 2007•13 citations

Borderline cases in density functional theory

L. Fritsche, J. Koller, Th. Reinert

Abstract We discuss two examples (antiferromagnetic order in transition metal oxides and van der Waals interaction) where density functional theory (DFT) seems to fail in giving an appropriate description of the actual physical situation. We analyze whether or not this failure reflects only a shortcoming of the approximations to the exchange‐correlation functionals that are commonly used. It is shown that the well‐known incapability of DFT to yield the correct antiferromagnetic (AF) moment and insulating properties of CoO and stoichiometric La2CuO4 may be indicative of a more fundamental deficiency, namely, absence of an exact noninteracting V‐representability of the spin densities in AF materials. By enlarging and reducing the self‐consistent DFT spin densities by an appropriate amount and simultaneously keeping the total densities fixed, one can turn CoO and La2CuO4 into insulators with the correct AF moments. We also discuss the ground‐state energy of two noble gas atoms of radius R0 at a distance R ≫ 2R0, for which situation an exact DFT should yield a 1/R6‐dependence for the difference between the total energy of the bi‐atom and the two atoms at infinite separation. Even if one improves the local density approximation to the exchange‐correlation energy by gradient corrections, this dependence remains outside the current practical framework of DFT. We report and practically check a simple idea as to how this difficulty can be overcome. The method we develop also might prove useful in actually calculating the above defect spin densities for critical AF materials. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2004

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 2004•9 citations

Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory from a Bohmian Perspective

Pratim Kumar Chattaraj

Since the early days of quantum mechanics, the wave function theory has proven to be very successful in describing many different quantum processes and phenomena. However, in many problems of quantum chemistry and solid-state physics, where the dimensionality of the systems studied is relatively high, ab initio calculations of the structure of atoms, molecules, clusters, and crystals, and their interactions are very often prohibitive. Hence, alternative formulations based on the direct use of the probability density, gathered under what is generally known as the density matrix theory [1], were also developed since the very beginning of the new mechanics. The independent electron approximation or Thomas-Fermi model, and the Hartree and Hartree-Fock approaches are former statistical models developed in that direction [2]. These models can be considered direct predecessors of the more recent density functional theory (DFT) [3], whose principles were established by Hohenberg, Kohn, and Sham [4,5] in the mid-1960s. According to this theory, the fundamental physical information about a many-body system is provided by single-particle densities in a three-dimensional space, which are obtained variationally within a time-independent framework. When compared with other previous formalisms, DFT presents two clear advantages: (1) it is able to treat many-body problems in a sufficiently accurate way and (2) it is computationally simple. This explains why it is one of the most widely used theories to deal with electronic structure-the electronic ground-state energy as a function of the position of the atomic nuclei determines molecular structures and solids, providing at the same time the forces acting on the atomic nuclei when they are not at their equilibrium positions. At present, DFT is used routinely to solve many problems in gas phase and condensed matter. Furthermore, it has made possible the development of accurate molecular dynamics schemes in which the forces are evaluated quantum mechanically ‘‘on the fly.’’ Nonetheless, DFT is a fundamental tool provided the systems studied are relatively large; for small systems, standard methods based on the use of the wave function render quite accurate results [6]. Moreover, it is also worth stressing that all practical applications of DFT rely on essentially uncontrolled approximations [7] (e.g., the local density approximation [4,5], the local spin-density approximation, or generalized gradient approximations [8]), and therefore the validity of DFT is conditioned to its capability to provide fairly good values of the experimental data.

CRC Press eBooks•Feb 23, 2009•3 citations

Nonuniqueness of the Potentials of Spin-Density-Functional Theory

Klaus Capelle, Giovanni Vignale

It is shown that, contrary to widely held beliefs, the potentials of spin-density-functional theory (SDFT) are not unique functionals of the spin densities. Explicit examples of distinct sets of potentials with the same ground-state densities are constructed. These findings imply that the zero-temperature exchange-correlation energy is not always a differentiable functional of the spin density. As a consequence, various types of applications of SDFT must be critically reexamined.

arXiv:cond-mat/0006116•Physical Review Letters•Jun 11, 2001•118 citations

Differentiability of energy functionals in spin-density-functional theory

Tamás Gál

Recently, nonuniqueness of external electrostatic and magnetic fields yielding a given many-electron ground state has been pointed out [K. Capelle and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5546 (2001); H. Eschrig and W. E. Pickett, Solid State Commun. 118, 123 (2001)], implying the nondifferentiability of the ground-state energy functional of spin-density-functional theory (SDFT), on the basis of which the applicability of widely used DFT methods in SDFT has been put into question and the need for a critical reexamination of those applications has been concluded. Here it is shown, for collinear magnetic fields, that the nonuniqueness of the external potentials in SDFT does not imply the nonexistence of number-conserving functional derivatives as well, with the use of which therefore problems arising from the nondifferentiability are avoided.

Physical Review B•Jun 22, 2007•4 citations

Solving the strong-correlation problem in materials

Eva Pavarini

Abstract This article is a short introduction to the modern computational techniques used to tackle the many-body problem in materials. The aim is to present the basic ideas, using simple examples to illustrate strengths and weaknesses of each method. We will start from density-functional theory (DFT) and the Kohn–Sham construction—the standard computational tools for performing electronic structure calculations. Leaving the realm of rigorous density-functional theory, we will discuss the established practice of adopting the Kohn–Sham Hamiltonian as approximate model. After recalling the triumphs of the Kohn–Sham description, we will stress the fundamental reasons of its failure for strongly-correlated compounds, and discuss the strategies adopted to overcome the problem. The article will then focus on the most effective method so far, the DFT+DMFT technique and its extensions. Achievements, open issues and possible future developments will be reviewed. The key differences between dynamical (DFT+DMFT) and static (DFT+ U ) mean-field methods will be elucidated. In the conclusion, we will assess the apparent dichotomy between first-principles and model-based techniques, emphasizing the common ground that in fact they share.

Rivista Del Nuovo Cimento•Jul 14, 2021•25 citations
Abstract Spin‐density functional theory (SDFT) is the most widely implemented and applied formulation of density functional theory. However, it is still finding novel applications, and occasionally encounters unexpected problems. In this article, we first briefly describe a few of the latter, related to issues such as nonuniqueness, noncollinearity, and currents. We then turn to an example of the former, namely SDFT for the Heisenberg model. It is shown that time‐honored concepts of Coulomb DFT, such as the local‐density approximation, can be applied to this (and other) model Hamiltonians, as well, once the concept of “density” has been suitably reinterpreted. Local‐density‐type approximations for the inhomogeneous Heisenberg model are constructed. Numerical applications to finite‐size and impurity systems demonstrate that DFT is a computationally efficient and reasonably accurate alternative to conventional methods of statistical mechanics for the Heisenberg model. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2005
We show that a lattice formulation of density functional theory (DFT), guided by renormalization-group concepts, can be used to obtain numerical predictions of energy gaps, spin-density profiles, critical exponents, sound velocities, surface energies, and conformal anomalies of spatially inhomogeneous quantum-spin chains. To this end, we (i) cast the formalism of DFT in the notation of quantum-spin chains to make the powerful methods and concepts developed in ab initio DFT available to workers in this field, (ii) explore to what extent simple local approximations in the spirit of the local-density approximation (LDA) can be used to predict critical exponents and conformal anomalies of quantum-spin models, and (iii) propose and explore various nonlocal approximations depending on the size of the system or on its average density in addition to the local density. These nonlocal functionals turn out to be superior to LDA functionals.
Abstract We discuss two examples (antiferromagnetic order in transition metal oxides and van der Waals interaction) where density functional theory (DFT) seems to fail in giving an appropriate description of the actual physical situation. We analyze whether or not this failure reflects only a shortcoming of the approximations to the exchange‐correlation functionals that are commonly used. It is shown that the well‐known incapability of DFT to yield the correct antiferromagnetic (AF) moment and insulating properties of CoO and stoichiometric La2CuO4 may be indicative of a more fundamental deficiency, namely, absence of an exact noninteracting V‐representability of the spin densities in AF materials. By enlarging and reducing the self‐consistent DFT spin densities by an appropriate amount and simultaneously keeping the total densities fixed, one can turn CoO and La2CuO4 into insulators with the correct AF moments. We also discuss the ground‐state energy of two noble gas atoms of radius R0 at a distance R ≫ 2R0, for which situation an exact DFT should yield a 1/R6‐dependence for the difference between the total energy of the bi‐atom and the two atoms at infinite separation. Even if one improves the local density approximation to the exchange‐correlation energy by gradient corrections, this dependence remains outside the current practical framework of DFT. We report and practically check a simple idea as to how this difficulty can be overcome. The method we develop also might prove useful in actually calculating the above defect spin densities for critical AF materials. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2004
Since the early days of quantum mechanics, the wave function theory has proven to be very successful in describing many different quantum processes and phenomena. However, in many problems of quantum chemistry and solid-state physics, where the dimensionality of the systems studied is relatively high, ab initio calculations of the structure of atoms, molecules, clusters, and crystals, and their interactions are very often prohibitive. Hence, alternative formulations based on the direct use of the probability density, gathered under what is generally known as the density matrix theory [1], were also developed since the very beginning of the new mechanics. The independent electron approximation or Thomas-Fermi model, and the Hartree and Hartree-Fock approaches are former statistical models developed in that direction [2]. These models can be considered direct predecessors of the more recent density functional theory (DFT) [3], whose principles were established by Hohenberg, Kohn, and Sham [4,5] in the mid-1960s. According to this theory, the fundamental physical information about a many-body system is provided by single-particle densities in a three-dimensional space, which are obtained variationally within a time-independent framework. When compared with other previous formalisms, DFT presents two clear advantages: (1) it is able to treat many-body problems in a sufficiently accurate way and (2) it is computationally simple. This explains why it is one of the most widely used theories to deal with electronic structure-the electronic ground-state energy as a function of the position of the atomic nuclei determines molecular structures and solids, providing at the same time the forces acting on the atomic nuclei when they are not at their equilibrium positions. At present, DFT is used routinely to solve many problems in gas phase and condensed matter. Furthermore, it has made possible the development of accurate molecular dynamics schemes in which the forces are evaluated quantum mechanically ‘‘on the fly.’’ Nonetheless, DFT is a fundamental tool provided the systems studied are relatively large; for small systems, standard methods based on the use of the wave function render quite accurate results [6]. Moreover, it is also worth stressing that all practical applications of DFT rely on essentially uncontrolled approximations [7] (e.g., the local density approximation [4,5], the local spin-density approximation, or generalized gradient approximations [8]), and therefore the validity of DFT is conditioned to its capability to provide fairly good values of the experimental data.
Recently, nonuniqueness of external electrostatic and magnetic fields yielding a given many-electron ground state has been pointed out [K. Capelle and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5546 (2001); H. Eschrig and W. E. Pickett, Solid State Commun. 118, 123 (2001)], implying the nondifferentiability of the ground-state energy functional of spin-density-functional theory (SDFT), on the basis of which the applicability of widely used DFT methods in SDFT has been put into question and the need for a critical reexamination of those applications has been concluded. Here it is shown, for collinear magnetic fields, that the nonuniqueness of the external potentials in SDFT does not imply the nonexistence of number-conserving functional derivatives as well, with the use of which therefore problems arising from the nondifferentiability are avoided.
Abstract This article is a short introduction to the modern computational techniques used to tackle the many-body problem in materials. The aim is to present the basic ideas, using simple examples to illustrate strengths and weaknesses of each method. We will start from density-functional theory (DFT) and the Kohn–Sham construction—the standard computational tools for performing electronic structure calculations. Leaving the realm of rigorous density-functional theory, we will discuss the established practice of adopting the Kohn–Sham Hamiltonian as approximate model. After recalling the triumphs of the Kohn–Sham description, we will stress the fundamental reasons of its failure for strongly-correlated compounds, and discuss the strategies adopted to overcome the problem. The article will then focus on the most effective method so far, the DFT+DMFT technique and its extensions. Achievements, open issues and possible future developments will be reviewed. The key differences between dynamical (DFT+DMFT) and static (DFT+ U ) mean-field methods will be elucidated. In the conclusion, we will assess the apparent dichotomy between first-principles and model-based techniques, emphasizing the common ground that in fact they share.