Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0502605 · Journal of Statistical Physics

Finite-Size Scaling in the Energy-Entropy Plane for the 2D ± Ising Spin Glass

Ronald Fisch

Published Jul 25, 2006• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10955-006-9164-1

Related papers

Aspect-Ratio Scaling of Domain Wall Entropy for the 2D ±J Ising Spin Glass

Ronald Fisch

arXiv:cond-mat/0703137•Journal of Statistical Physics•Oct 2, 2007•5 citations

Finite-Size Scaling Studies of Ising Spin Glasses

Adam C. Carter

•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Finite size scaling in 3D Ising spin glasses

Matteo Palassini, Sergio Caracciolo A

Computer Physics Communications•Sep 1, 1999•0 citations

Study of +/-J Ising Spin Glasses via Multicanonical Ensemble

Tarık Çelik, Ulrich H. E. Hansmann, Bernd A. Berg

We performed numerical simulations of 2D and 3D Edwards-Anderson spin glass models by using the recently developed multicanonical ensemble. Our ergodicity times increase with the lattice size approximately as $V^3$. The energy, entropy and other physical quantities are easily calculable at all temperatures from a single simulation. Their finite size scalings and the zero temperature limits are also explored.

arXiv:cond-mat/9303025•Mar 13, 1993•0 citations

Finite-size scaling of the Domain Wall Entropy for the 2D \pm J Ising Spin Glass

Ronald Fisch

The statistics of domain walls for ground states of the 2D Ising spin glass with +1 and -1 bonds are studied for $L \times L$ square lattices with $L \le 20$, and $x$ = 0.25 and 0.5, where $x$ is the fraction of negative bonds, using periodic and/or antiperiodic boundary conditions. Under these conditions, almost all domain walls have an energy $E_{dw}$ equal to 0 or 4. The probability distribution of the entropy, $S_{dw}$, is found to depend strongly on $E_{dw}$. The results for $S_{dw}$ when $E_{dw} = 4$ agree with the prediction of the droplet model. Our results for $S_{dw}$ when $E_{dw} = 0$ agree with those of Saul and Kardar. In addition, we find that the distributions do not appear to be Gaussian in that case. The special role of $E_{dw} = 0$ domain walls is discussed, and the discrepancy between the prediction of Amoruso, Hartmann, Hastings and Moore and the result of Saul and Kardar is explained.

arXiv:cond-mat/0508468•Aug 19, 2005•0 citations

Multicanonical Study of the 3D Ising Spin Glass

Bernd A. Berg, T. Çelik, Ulrich H. E. Hansmann

We simulated the Edwards-Anderson Ising spin glass model in three dimensions via the recently proposed multicanonical ensemble. Physical quantities such as energy density, specific heat and entropy are evaluated at all temperatures. We studied their finite-size scaling, as well as the zero-temperature limit to explore the ground-state properties. Our estimate of the ground-state entropy per spin is s 0 = 0.046 ÷ 0.002.

arXiv:cond-mat/9210005•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Apr 1, 1993•38 citations
We performed numerical simulations of 2D and 3D Edwards-Anderson spin glass models by using the recently developed multicanonical ensemble. Our ergodicity times increase with the lattice size approximately as V3V^3V3. The energy, entropy and other physical quantities are easily calculable at all temperatures from a single simulation. Their finite size scalings and the zero temperature limits are also explored.
The statistics of domain walls for ground states of the 2D Ising spin glass with +1 and -1 bonds are studied for L×LL \times LL×L square lattices with L≤20L \le 20L≤20, and xxx = 0.25 and 0.5, where xxx is the fraction of negative bonds, using periodic and/or antiperiodic boundary conditions. Under these conditions, almost all domain walls have an energy EdwE_{dw}Edw​ equal to 0 or 4. The probability distribution of the entropy, SdwS_{dw}Sdw​, is found to depend strongly on EdwE_{dw}Edw​. The results for SdwS_{dw}Sdw​ when Edw=4E_{dw} = 4Edw​=4 agree with the prediction of the droplet model. Our results for SdwS_{dw}Sdw​ when Edw=0E_{dw} = 0Edw​=0 agree with those of Saul and Kardar. In addition, we find that the distributions do not appear to be Gaussian in that case. The special role of Edw=0E_{dw} = 0Edw​=0 domain walls is discussed, and the discrepancy between the prediction of Amoruso, Hartmann, Hastings and Moore and the result of Saul and Kardar is explained.