Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0501227 · Physical Review Letters

Derivation of the Order Parameter of the Chiral Potts Model

R. J. Baxter

Published Apr 8, 2005• 46 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We derive the order parameter of the chiral Potts model, using the method of Jimbo et al. The result agrees with previous conjectures.
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.94.130602

Related papers

The challenge of the chiral Potts model

R. J. Baxter

The chiral Potts model continues to pose particular challenges in statistical mechanics: it is “exactly solvable ” in the sense that it satisfies the Yang-Baxter relation, but actually obtaining the solution is not easy. Its free energy was calculated in 1988 and the order parameter was conjectured in full generality a year later. However, a derivation of that conjecture had to wait until 2005. Here we discuss that derivation. 1

•Jan 1, 2005•6 citations

The challenge of the chiral Potts model

R. J. Baxter

The chiral Potts model continues to pose particular challenges in statistical mechanics: it is ''exactly solvable'' in the sense that it satisfies the Yang-Baxter relation, but actually obtaining the solution is not easy. Its free energy was calculated in 1988 and the order parameter was conjectured in full generality a year later. However, a derivation of that conjecture had to wait until 2005. Here we discuss that derivation.

arXiv:cond-mat/0510683•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 1, 2006•9 citations

Functional relations for the order parameters of the chiral Potts model: low-temperature expansions

R. J. Baxter

arXiv:cond-mat/9808120•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Nov 1, 1998•13 citations

Excitation spectrum and order parameter for the integrable N-state chiral Potts model

Giuseppe Albertini, Barry M. McCoy, Jacques H. H. Perk +1 more

Nuclear Physics B•Mar 1, 1989•122 citations

Sorting Out the Potts Models

R. J. Baxter

It was a great pleasure to hear that the American Physical Society had awarded me the 2006 Lars Onsager Prize and to read the informative news story “Order Parameter of the Chiral Potts Model Succumbs at Last to Exact Solution” that appeared on page 19 of the November edition of Physics Today. I have a few comments.There are various models named after Ren Potts, who died in Adelaide, Australia, on 9 August 2005. He was a student of Cyril Domb at Oxford University in 1952, and worked on the vector and scalar extensions of the Ising model. 1 1. R. Potts, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 48, 106 (1952) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100027419. The two are often confused. The vector model is described in the Physics Today story, whereas it is the scalar model that has been solved at criticality. The N-state chiral Potts model is a different model again. Its transfer matrices commute, which makes it “solvable” in the sense that one can calculate the free energy. For N = 2 it reduces to the Ising model. It is true that C. N. Yang took six months to calculate the spontaneous magnetization (order parameter) of the Ising model, 2 2. C. N. Yang, Collected Papers, Freeman and Co, San Francisco (1983), p. 12. whereas I have been puzzling over the extension of that problem to the chiral Potts model for 15 years!For both models the results were previously known: Onsager had announced his result for the Ising model at a conference in 1949, 3 3. L. Onsager, Nuovo Cimento 6(suppl.), 261 (1949). and Giuseppe Albertini, Barry McCoy, Jacques Perk, and Shuang Tang gave the formula for chiral Potts in 1989. However, there are some differences.The story refers to both these announcements as conjectures, but it is clear from a later paper by Onsager 4 4. L. Onsager, in Critical Phenomena in Alloys, Magnets and Superconductors, R. E. Mills, E. Ascher, R. I. Jaffee, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York (1971), p. 3. that he had already derived his answer when he announced it. Being Onsager, he did not rush into print, but worked at refining and polishing his derivation for three years, which gave Yang the opportunity to publish his solution in 1952.By contrast, the chiral Potts result given by Giuseppe Albertini and colleagues really was a conjecture—an elegant formula, inspired by the Ising result, that fitted all known series expansions. It is this conjecture that I have now verified, subject to analyticity assumptions no more drastic than those used for the order parameters of other post-Ising models. From 1998 until recently, I was looking at the Jimbo-Miwa-Nakayashiki method. It depends on solving for a function of two arguments, and I was having trouble. The idea that came to me over two days in December 2004 was to relate those arguments so that there was just one independent variable, in much the same way as in the free energy calculation one starts by looking at the simpler “superintegrable” case. The switch to one variable made the needed analyticity properties fairly obvious, and was sufficient to obtain the order parameters. 5 5. R. J. Baxter, J. Stat. Phys. 120, 1 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-5534-3. It was a good illustration of the approach used in these solvable models—one needs to generalize sufficiently to see properties like commuting transfer matrices, but one should beware of generalizing unnecessarily.REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<CITING ARTICLES1. R. Potts, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 48, 106 (1952) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100027419. Google ScholarCrossref, ISI2. C. N. Yang, Collected Papers, Freeman and Co, San Francisco (1983), p. 12. Google Scholar3. L. Onsager, Nuovo Cimento 6(suppl.), 261 (1949). Google ScholarCrossref4. L. Onsager, in Critical Phenomena in Alloys, Magnets and Superconductors, R. E. Mills, E. Ascher, R. I. Jaffee, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York (1971), p. 3. Google Scholar5. R. J. Baxter, J. Stat. Phys. 120, 1 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-5534-3. Google ScholarCrossref, ISI© 2005 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Dec 1, 2005•4 citations

Functional relations for the order parameters of the chiral Potts model: low-temperature expansions

R. J. Baxter

This is the third in a series of papers in which we set up and discuss the functional relations for the “split rapidity line” correlation function in the N-state chiral Potts model. The order parameters of the model can be obtained from this function. Here we consider the case N=3 and write the equations explicitly in terms of the hyperelliptic functions parametrization. We also present four-term low-temperature series expansions, which we hope will cast light on the analyticity properties needed to solve the relations. The problem remains unsolved, but we hope that this will prove to be a step in the right direction.

•Jan 1, 1998•11 citations
It was a great pleasure to hear that the American Physical Society had awarded me the 2006 Lars Onsager Prize and to read the informative news story “Order Parameter of the Chiral Potts Model Succumbs at Last to Exact Solution” that appeared on page 19 of the November edition of Physics Today. I have a few comments.There are various models named after Ren Potts, who died in Adelaide, Australia, on 9 August 2005. He was a student of Cyril Domb at Oxford University in 1952, and worked on the vector and scalar extensions of the Ising model. 1 1. R. Potts, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 48, 106 (1952) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100027419. The two are often confused. The vector model is described in the Physics Today story, whereas it is the scalar model that has been solved at criticality. The N-state chiral Potts model is a different model again. Its transfer matrices commute, which makes it “solvable” in the sense that one can calculate the free energy. For N = 2 it reduces to the Ising model. It is true that C. N. Yang took six months to calculate the spontaneous magnetization (order parameter) of the Ising model, 2 2. C. N. Yang, Collected Papers, Freeman and Co, San Francisco (1983), p. 12. whereas I have been puzzling over the extension of that problem to the chiral Potts model for 15 years!For both models the results were previously known: Onsager had announced his result for the Ising model at a conference in 1949, 3 3. L. Onsager, Nuovo Cimento 6(suppl.), 261 (1949). and Giuseppe Albertini, Barry McCoy, Jacques Perk, and Shuang Tang gave the formula for chiral Potts in 1989. However, there are some differences.The story refers to both these announcements as conjectures, but it is clear from a later paper by Onsager 4 4. L. Onsager, in Critical Phenomena in Alloys, Magnets and Superconductors, R. E. Mills, E. Ascher, R. I. Jaffee, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York (1971), p. 3. that he had already derived his answer when he announced it. Being Onsager, he did not rush into print, but worked at refining and polishing his derivation for three years, which gave Yang the opportunity to publish his solution in 1952.By contrast, the chiral Potts result given by Giuseppe Albertini and colleagues really was a conjecture—an elegant formula, inspired by the Ising result, that fitted all known series expansions. It is this conjecture that I have now verified, subject to analyticity assumptions no more drastic than those used for the order parameters of other post-Ising models. From 1998 until recently, I was looking at the Jimbo-Miwa-Nakayashiki method. It depends on solving for a function of two arguments, and I was having trouble. The idea that came to me over two days in December 2004 was to relate those arguments so that there was just one independent variable, in much the same way as in the free energy calculation one starts by looking at the simpler “superintegrable” case. The switch to one variable made the needed analyticity properties fairly obvious, and was sufficient to obtain the order parameters. 5 5. R. J. Baxter, J. Stat. Phys. 120, 1 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-5534-3. It was a good illustration of the approach used in these solvable models—one needs to generalize sufficiently to see properties like commuting transfer matrices, but one should beware of generalizing unnecessarily.REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<CITING ARTICLES1. R. Potts, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 48, 106 (1952) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100027419. Google ScholarCrossref, ISI2. C. N. Yang, Collected Papers, Freeman and Co, San Francisco (1983), p. 12. Google Scholar3. L. Onsager, Nuovo Cimento 6(suppl.), 261 (1949). Google ScholarCrossref4. L. Onsager, in Critical Phenomena in Alloys, Magnets and Superconductors, R. E. Mills, E. Ascher, R. I. Jaffee, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York (1971), p. 3. Google Scholar5. R. J. Baxter, J. Stat. Phys. 120, 1 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-5534-3. Google ScholarCrossref, ISI© 2005 American Institute of Physics.
This is the third in a series of papers in which we set up and discuss the functional relations for the “split rapidity line” correlation function in the N-state chiral Potts model. The order parameters of the model can be obtained from this function. Here we consider the case N=3 and write the equations explicitly in terms of the hyperelliptic functions parametrization. We also present four-term low-temperature series expansions, which we hope will cast light on the analyticity properties needed to solve the relations. The problem remains unsolved, but we hope that this will prove to be a step in the right direction.