Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0412632

Quantum Magnets with Anisotropic Infinite Range Random Interactions

Liliana Arrachea, Marcelo J. Rozenberg

Published Dec 22, 2004• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Using exact diagonalization techniques we study the dynamical response of the anisotropic disordered Heisenberg model for systems of S=1/2 spins with infinite range random exchange interactions at temperature T=0. The model can be considered as a generalization, to the quantum case, of the well known Sherrington-Kirkpatrick classical spin-glass model. We also compute and study the behavior of the Edwards Anderson order parameter and energy per spin as the anisotropy evolves from the Ising to the Heisenberg limits.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/0412632

Related papers

Infinite-range quantum random Heisenberg magnet

Liliana Arrachea, Marcelo J. Rozenberg

We study with exact diagonalization techniques the Heisenberg model for a system of SU(2) spins with $S=1/2$ and random infinite-range exchange interactions. We calculate the critical temperature ${T}_{g}$ for the spin-glass to paramagnetic transition. We obtain ${T}_{g}\ensuremath{\approx}0.13,$ in good agreement with previous quantum Monte Carlo and analytical estimates. We provide a detailed picture for the different kind of excitations which intervene in the dynamical response ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{\ensuremath{''}}(\ensuremath{\omega},T)$ at $T=0$ and analyze their evolution as T increases. We also calculate the specific heat ${C}_{v}(T).$ We find that it displays a smooth maximum at ${T}_{M}\ensuremath{\approx}0.25,$ in good qualitative agreement with experiments. We argue that the fact that ${T}_{M}>{T}_{g}$ is due to a quantum disorder effect.

arXiv:cond-mat/0203537•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Jun 13, 2002•29 citations

Dynamical Response of Quantum Spin-Glass Models at T=0

Liliana Arrachea, Marcelo J. Rozenberg

We study the behavior of two archetypal quantum spin glasses at $T\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}0$ by exact diagonalization techniques: the random Ising model in a transverse field and the random Heisenberg model. The behavior of the dynamical spin response is obtained in the spin-glass ordered phase. In both models it is gapless and has the general form ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}(\ensuremath{\omega})\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}q\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\omega})+{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{reg}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}(\ensuremath{\omega})$, with ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{reg}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}(\ensuremath{\omega})\ensuremath{\sim}\ensuremath{\omega}$ for the Ising and ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{reg}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}(\ensuremath{\omega})\ensuremath{\sim}\mathrm{const}$ for the Heisenberg, at low frequencies. The method provides new insight to the physical nature of the low-lying excitations.

Physical Review Letters•May 28, 2001•29 citations

Solution of the Quantum Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model

Daniel R. Grempel, Marcelo J. Rozenberg

We solve the $S=1/2$ infinite-range random Heisenberg Hamiltonian in the paramagnetic phase using quantum Monte Carlo and analytical techniques. We find that the spin-glass susceptibility diverges at a finite temperature $T_g$ which demonstrates the existence of a low-temperature ordered phase. Quantum fluctuations reduce the critical temperature and the effective Curie constant with respect to their classical values. They also give rise to a redistribution of spectral weight in the dynamic structure factor in the paramagnetic phase. As the temperature decreases the spectrum of magnetic excitations gradually splits into quasi-elastic and inelastic contributions whose weights scale as $S^2$ and $S$ at low temperature.

arXiv:cond-mat/9707288•Jul 28, 1997•1 citation

An effective expansion for the free energy of quantum spin glass models with infinite-range interactions

Zbigniew Domański

An expansion for the free energy functional of quantum spin models is build around diagonalisable single-ion term of the system’s Hamiltonian. This expansion is obtained within the Matsubara time formalism by introducing recursive relations involving the spin correlation functions. Introduction Spin glass systems (SG) are collections of atoms or molecules with randomly distributed magnetic moments and frustrated interactions. They have gained much attentions of the scientific community since the seminal work by Edwards and Anderson [1]. Physical concepts and mathematical tools developed in the contest of SG are applicable not only in physics but also in biology, economy, informatics, e.g. in the study of optimization theory and neural networks. In quantum spin glass models with infinite-range interactions attention has been paid to description of the transition between disordered (paramagnetic) and ordered spin glass phases. However, even an approximate description of the phase change involves an expansion of the free energy functional in terms of the powers of the order parameters. In this work we present a method to built such an expansion in a systematic way. The general formulation requires that the Hamiltonian H of the system of interacting spins is composed of two parts: a single-site part H0 and an exchange, two-site part H1. The single-site term may represent an external magnetic field or single-ion anisotropies. The exchange two-site term we use is the quantum Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model [2]: ∑∑ ≠ − = α α α N j i j i ij S S J H 2 1 1 (1) where α i S are the spin operators Pauli matrices referred to the spin i of an ensemble of N spins z y x , , = α and . , , 1 N i = The random exchange interactions Please cite this article as: Zbigniew Domanski, An effective expansion for the free energy of quantum spin glass models with infinite-range interactions, Scientific Research of the Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, 2009, Volume 8, Issue 2, pages 37-42. The website: http://www.amcm.pcz.pl/ Z. Domanski 38 { } ij J are governed by independent probability distributions taken to be Gaussian with zero mean and variance . / 1 N 1. Free energy In order to obtain the free energy averaged over the distribution of { } ij J we apply the replica trick and Matsubara ”time” representation [3]. The replica trick is used to overcome the difficulties of averaging a logarithm and it employs the identity [ ] [ ] ( ) n Z Z J n n J 1 lim ln 0 − = → (2) where [ ]J means an averaging over the random exchange interactions ij J . The Matsubara ”time” representation is based on the operator identity ( ) ( ) ( )( ) [ ] ( ) A t B A t t tA B d T t t 0 0 exp exp exp exp 0 ⋅ + − ⋅ − =     ∫ τ τ τ (3) ( ) ( ) ( ) tA B tA t B exp exp ⋅ ⋅ − = (4) Here the time ordering operator τ T rearranges the operator in the expansion of the exponential, in order of decreasing time arguments. This representation enables us to avoid the problem of the non-commutativity of the spin operators α S and to treat them as numbers. Applying (2)-(4) to the Hamiltonian (1) the replica free energy has the following form [4, 5] ( ) [ ] ( ) ∫ ∫ = Φ ⋅ = eff 0 Tr ln exp Tr ln H q H q e Dz T e Dz F τ (5) 3 2 1 Φ + Φ + Φ = Φ q z (6) ( ) ∫ ∑ = Φ 1 0 1 2 n n S d τ τ β (7) ( ) ( ) ∫ ∫ ∑ ′ ⋅ ′ − = Φ 1 0 1 0 , 2 m n m n S S d d τ τ τ τ β (8) ( ) ( ) ( ) ∫ ∫ ∑ ′ ′ ′ = Φ 1 0 1 0 3 , n n n S R S d d τ τ τ τ τ τ β (9) An effective expansion for the free energy of quantum spin glass models with infinite-range interactions 39 where T / 1 = β is the inverse temperature and the integration in Eq. (5) is over the field: ( ) ( )    − = 2 / / exp / 2 1 2 q z q z d Dzq π (10) In Equations (5)-(10), the quantity q is the Edwards-Anderson spin glass order parameter and ( ) τ τ ′ , R is the dynamic spin self-interaction. ( ) τ τ ′ , R describes the quantum fluctuations. The spin glass order parameter vanishes in the paramagnetic (disordered) phase whereas the dynamic spin self-interaction persists in both phases. In order to locate the phase change one needs to expand the free energy functional as a series in power of q. The phase transition takes place when the coefficient of 2 q becomes zero as a function of the temperature T and thus, one of the most useful information can be retrieve from an expansion of the functional F, Eqs. (5-9). 2. An expansion Consider the free energy F given by Equations (5)-(10). Using these equations we can compute the thermal average with respect to the effective Hamiltonian eff H defined in the exponent of Eq. (5). We denote this thermal average by the angular bracket, namely: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Φ Φ τ τ τ τ τ τ τ exp Tr exp Tr 0 1 0 1 1 eff 1 T e S S T e S S T H p n n H p n n p p ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = (11) From Eq. (10) we see that ( ) ( ) q q Dz z Dz q ν ν ν ν ν 2 2 2 ∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂ − (12) Using Eqs. (11) and (12) we can compute the first derivative of F with respect to the order parameter q. First, we do this by direct computation. Direct computation involves the straightforward evaluation of multiple thermal averages of Eq. (11). ( ) ( ) [ ] ( ) [ ] ∫ ∫ + + ⋅ ∂ + ⋅ ∂ = ∂ 3 2 1 exp Tr ln exp Tr ln

Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computational Mechanics•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Staggered-magnetization approach to spin-glasses

Haim Sompolinsky

A method is developed to solve the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick infinite-ranged spin-glass model, considering the staggered magnetizations associated with the eigenvalue spectrum of the random interaction matrix as the spin-glass order parameters. It is shown that the spin-glass ordering is not associated with a macroscopic condensation of eigenstates, but instead each of the $N$ eigenstates acquires, below ${T}_{c}$, nonzero magnetization of $O(1)$.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Feb 1, 1981•25 citations

Some aspects of infinite range models of spin glasses: theory and numerical simulations

Alain H. Billoire

These notes give an introduction to the physics of the infinite range version of the Edwards--Anderson model, the so-called Sherrington--Kirkpatrick model. In a first part, I motivate and introduce the Edwards--Anderson and Sherrington--Kirkpatrick models. In the second part, I explain the analytical solution of the Sherrington--Kirkpatrick model, following Giorgio Parisi. I next give the physical interpretation of this solution. This is a vast subject, and I concentrate on the major points and give references for more details. The third part presents the simulation approach and compare its results to theoretical expectations: thermodynamics, finite size scaling, determination of the critical temperature using "parameters" like the "Binder parameter", and fluctuations. The last part gives a summary of our current understanding of finite size effects for the free energy and internal energy of the Sherrington--Kirkpatrick model

arXiv:0709.1552•Sep 11, 2007•3 citations
Using exact diagonalization techniques we study the dynamical response of the anisotropic disordered Heisenberg model for systems of S=1/2 spins with infinite range random exchange interactions at temperature T=0. The model can be considered as a generalization, to the quantum case, of the well known Sherrington-Kirkpatrick classical spin-glass model. We also compute and study the behavior of the Edwards Anderson order parameter and energy per spin as the anisotropy evolves from the Ising to the Heisenberg limits.
We study with exact diagonalization techniques the Heisenberg model for a system of SU(2) spins with S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2 and random infinite-range exchange interactions. We calculate the critical temperature Tg{T}_{g}Tg​ for the spin-glass to paramagnetic transition. We obtain ${T}_{g}\ensuremath{\approx}0.13,$ in good agreement with previous quantum Monte Carlo and analytical estimates. We provide a detailed picture for the different kind of excitations which intervene in the dynamical response ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{\ensuremath{''}}(\ensuremath{\omega},T)$ at T=0T=0T=0 and analyze their evolution as T increases. We also calculate the specific heat Cv(T).{C}_{v}(T).Cv​(T). We find that it displays a smooth maximum at ${T}_{M}\ensuremath{\approx}0.25,$ in good qualitative agreement with experiments. We argue that the fact that TM>Tg{T}_{M}>{T}_{g}TM​>Tg​ is due to a quantum disorder effect.
We study the behavior of two archetypal quantum spin glasses at T=0T\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}0T=0 by exact diagonalization techniques: the random Ising model in a transverse field and the random Heisenberg model. The behavior of the dynamical spin response is obtained in the spin-glass ordered phase. In both models it is gapless and has the general form ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}(\ensuremath{\omega})\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}q\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\omega})+{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{reg}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}(\ensuremath{\omega})$, with ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{reg}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}(\ensuremath{\omega})\ensuremath{\sim}\ensuremath{\omega}$ for the Ising and ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{reg}}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}(\ensuremath{\omega})\ensuremath{\sim}\mathrm{const}$ for the Heisenberg, at low frequencies. The method provides new insight to the physical nature of the low-lying excitations.
We solve the S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2 infinite-range random Heisenberg Hamiltonian in the paramagnetic phase using quantum Monte Carlo and analytical techniques. We find that the spin-glass susceptibility diverges at a finite temperature TgT_gTg​ which demonstrates the existence of a low-temperature ordered phase. Quantum fluctuations reduce the critical temperature and the effective Curie constant with respect to their classical values. They also give rise to a redistribution of spectral weight in the dynamic structure factor in the paramagnetic phase. As the temperature decreases the spectrum of magnetic excitations gradually splits into quasi-elastic and inelastic contributions whose weights scale as S2S^2S2 and SSS at low temperature.
An expansion for the free energy functional of quantum spin models is build around diagonalisable single-ion term of the system’s Hamiltonian. This expansion is obtained within the Matsubara time formalism by introducing recursive relations involving the spin correlation functions. Introduction Spin glass systems (SG) are collections of atoms or molecules with randomly distributed magnetic moments and frustrated interactions. They have gained much attentions of the scientific community since the seminal work by Edwards and Anderson [1]. Physical concepts and mathematical tools developed in the contest of SG are applicable not only in physics but also in biology, economy, informatics, e.g. in the study of optimization theory and neural networks. In quantum spin glass models with infinite-range interactions attention has been paid to description of the transition between disordered (paramagnetic) and ordered spin glass phases. However, even an approximate description of the phase change involves an expansion of the free energy functional in terms of the powers of the order parameters. In this work we present a method to built such an expansion in a systematic way. The general formulation requires that the Hamiltonian H of the system of interacting spins is composed of two parts: a single-site part H0 and an exchange, two-site part H1. The single-site term may represent an external magnetic field or single-ion anisotropies. The exchange two-site term we use is the quantum Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model [2]: ∑∑ ≠ − = α α α N j i j i ij S S J H 2 1 1 (1) where α i S are the spin operators Pauli matrices referred to the spin i of an ensemble of N spins z y x , , = α and . , , 1 N i = The random exchange interactions Please cite this article as: Zbigniew Domanski, An effective expansion for the free energy of quantum spin glass models with infinite-range interactions, Scientific Research of the Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, 2009, Volume 8, Issue 2, pages 37-42. The website: http://www.amcm.pcz.pl/ Z. Domanski 38 { } ij J are governed by independent probability distributions taken to be Gaussian with zero mean and variance . / 1 N 1. Free energy In order to obtain the free energy averaged over the distribution of { } ij J we apply the replica trick and Matsubara ”time” representation [3]. The replica trick is used to overcome the difficulties of averaging a logarithm and it employs the identity [ ] [ ] ( ) n Z Z J n n J 1 lim ln 0 − = → (2) where [ ]J means an averaging over the random exchange interactions ij J . The Matsubara ”time” representation is based on the operator identity ( ) ( ) ( )( ) [ ] ( ) A t B A t t tA B d T t t 0 0 exp exp exp exp 0 ⋅ + − ⋅ − =     ∫ τ τ τ (3) ( ) ( ) ( ) tA B tA t B exp exp ⋅ ⋅ − = (4) Here the time ordering operator τ T rearranges the operator in the expansion of the exponential, in order of decreasing time arguments. This representation enables us to avoid the problem of the non-commutativity of the spin operators α S and to treat them as numbers. Applying (2)-(4) to the Hamiltonian (1) the replica free energy has the following form [4, 5] ( ) [ ] ( ) ∫ ∫ = Φ ⋅ = eff 0 Tr ln exp Tr ln H q H q e Dz T e Dz F τ (5) 3 2 1 Φ + Φ + Φ = Φ q z (6) ( ) ∫ ∑ = Φ 1 0 1 2 n n S d τ τ β (7) ( ) ( ) ∫ ∫ ∑ ′ ⋅ ′ − = Φ 1 0 1 0 , 2 m n m n S S d d τ τ τ τ β (8) ( ) ( ) ( ) ∫ ∫ ∑ ′ ′ ′ = Φ 1 0 1 0 3 , n n n S R S d d τ τ τ τ τ τ β (9) An effective expansion for the free energy of quantum spin glass models with infinite-range interactions 39 where T / 1 = β is the inverse temperature and the integration in Eq. (5) is over the field: ( ) ( )    − = 2 / / exp / 2 1 2 q z q z d Dzq π (10) In Equations (5)-(10), the quantity q is the Edwards-Anderson spin glass order parameter and ( ) τ τ ′ , R is the dynamic spin self-interaction. ( ) τ τ ′ , R describes the quantum fluctuations. The spin glass order parameter vanishes in the paramagnetic (disordered) phase whereas the dynamic spin self-interaction persists in both phases. In order to locate the phase change one needs to expand the free energy functional as a series in power of q. The phase transition takes place when the coefficient of 2 q becomes zero as a function of the temperature T and thus, one of the most useful information can be retrieve from an expansion of the functional F, Eqs. (5-9). 2. An expansion Consider the free energy F given by Equations (5)-(10). Using these equations we can compute the thermal average with respect to the effective Hamiltonian eff H defined in the exponent of Eq. (5). We denote this thermal average by the angular bracket, namely: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Φ Φ τ τ τ τ τ τ τ exp Tr exp Tr 0 1 0 1 1 eff 1 T e S S T e S S T H p n n H p n n p p ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = (11) From Eq. (10) we see that ( ) ( ) q q Dz z Dz q ν ν ν ν ν 2 2 2 ∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂ − (12) Using Eqs. (11) and (12) we can compute the first derivative of F with respect to the order parameter q. First, we do this by direct computation. Direct computation involves the straightforward evaluation of multiple thermal averages of Eq. (11). ( ) ( ) [ ] ( ) [ ] ∫ ∫ + + ⋅ ∂ + ⋅ ∂ = ∂ 3 2 1 exp Tr ln exp Tr ln
A method is developed to solve the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick infinite-ranged spin-glass model, considering the staggered magnetizations associated with the eigenvalue spectrum of the random interaction matrix as the spin-glass order parameters. It is shown that the spin-glass ordering is not associated with a macroscopic condensation of eigenstates, but instead each of the NNN eigenstates acquires, below Tc{T}_{c}Tc​, nonzero magnetization of O(1)O(1)O(1).
These notes give an introduction to the physics of the infinite range version of the Edwards--Anderson model, the so-called Sherrington--Kirkpatrick model. In a first part, I motivate and introduce the Edwards--Anderson and Sherrington--Kirkpatrick models. In the second part, I explain the analytical solution of the Sherrington--Kirkpatrick model, following Giorgio Parisi. I next give the physical interpretation of this solution. This is a vast subject, and I concentrate on the major points and give references for more details. The third part presents the simulation approach and compare its results to theoretical expectations: thermodynamics, finite size scaling, determination of the critical temperature using "parameters" like the "Binder parameter", and fluctuations. The last part gives a summary of our current understanding of finite size effects for the free energy and internal energy of the Sherrington--Kirkpatrick model