Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0411174

Superconducting Qubits: A Short Review

Michel Devoret, Andreas J. Wallraff, John M. Martinis

Published Nov 7, 2004• 191 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Superconducting qubits are solid state electrical circuits fabricated using techniques borrowed from conventional integrated circuits. They are based on the Josephson tunnel junction, the only non-dissipative, strongly non-linear circuit element available at low temperature. In contrast to microscopic entities such as spins or atoms, they tend to be well coupled to other circuits, which make them appealling from the point of view of readout and gate implementation. Very recently, new designs of superconducting qubits based on multi-junction circuits have solved the problem of isolation from unwanted extrinsic electromagnetic perturbations. We discuss in this review how qubit decoherence is affected by the intrinsic noise of the junction and what can be done to improve it.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/0411174

Related papers

Superconducting qubits : survey and theoretical investigations for solid state quantum computing

Santosh Kumar Gupta

Superconducting qubits have in recent years become a promising candidate for the implementation of a quantum computer due to their design flexibility, good protection from decohering elementary excitations, and availability of well developed fabrication and measurement techniques. Superconducting flux qubits, for which the effect of offset charge noise is reduced due to the fact that the Josephson energy dominates over the charging energy, correspond to one of the proposed means of designing a superconducting qubit. A nonlinear dispersive readout scheme of flux qubits involving a DC SQUID magnetometer that avoids the effects of on-chip dissipation can be readily implemented, yielding high contrast output for single qubit readout. Coupling schemes via nonlinear Josephson elements have also been realized. On the other hand, while the means of isolating superconducting qubits from external noise sources has been found, the mechanisms by which they undergo relaxation and decoherence due to intrinsic noise sources in the junctions themselves are not very well understood, and the question of how to deal with these noise sources remains unanswered in the general case. Other questions deal with the problem of experimentally observing entanglement in an array of coupled superconducting qubits, and finding the means by which the existence of entanglement in a typical laboratory setup may to some extent be verified by measurements on a global scale. Following a brief introductory review, we will first investigate the influence of a Two-Level Fluctuator on a DC SQUID driven by a finite current bias. Then we introduce a directly measurable signature of multiqubit entanglement for a large system of qubits and show that it is compatible to a recently introduced measure of global entanglement.

•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Materials Origins of Decoherence in Superconducting Qubits

R. McDermott

Superconducting integrated circuits incorporating Josephson junctions are an attractive candidate for scalable quantum information processing in the solid state. The strong nonlinearity of the Josephson effect enables one to tailor an anharmonic potential and thus to realize an artificial quantum two-level system (“qubit”) from a macroscopic superconducting circuit. Josephson qubits can be made to interact strongly and controllably, and it should be straightforward to fabricate circuits incorporating hundreds or even thousands of Josephson qubits using standard thin-film processing techniques. Work over the last several years has shown that qubit performance is limited by spurious coupling of the qubit to microscopic defect states in the materials that are used to implement the circuit. Here we discuss the materials origins of dissipation and dephasing in superconducting qubits. A deeper understanding of the underlying materials physics that governs decoherence in superconducting quantum circuits will guide the search for improved, low-noise materials and fuel continued progress in the field of superconducting quantum computing.

IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity•Jan 20, 2009•120 citations

Progress in superconducting qubits from the perspective of coherence and readout

Youpeng Zhong, Chunyan Li, Haohua Wang +1 more

Superconducting qubits are Josephson junction-based circuits that exhibit macroscopic quantum behavior and can be manipulated as artificial atoms. Benefiting from the well-developed technology of microfabrication and microwave engineering, superconducting qubits have great advantages in design flexibility, controllability, and scalability. Over the past decade, there has been rapid progress in the field, which greatly improved our understanding of qubit decoherence and circuit optimization. The single-qubit coherence time has been steadily raised to the order of 10 to 100 μs, allowing for the demonstration of high-fidelity gate operations and measurement-based feedback control. Here we review recent progress in the coherence and readout of superconducting qubits.

Chinese Physics B•Nov 1, 2013•7 citations

The road to long coherence time superconducting quantum bits

Dongning Zheng, Yirong Jin

Superconducting quantum computing is a solid state quantum computing technology based on Josephson junction circuits. It becomes one of the most promising candidates for realizing practical quantum computer/simulator, because of its scalability, easy to coupling and control, compatibility to semiconductor technologies, etc. As the complicated electromagnetic environment in solid state metal and insulator, superconducting quantum bits (qubits) suffered from shot coherence time since its early development. In this review, we described some recently developed superconducting qubit structures, including Transmon/Xmon, Fluxonium and C-shunt flux qubit. Although these new qubit structures have very different circuit parameters and energy scales, they all find their way to effectively suppress environmental noises. As a result, their coherence time were improved significantly. Transmon, a transmission-line shunted plasma oscillation qubit, was now among the most popular structures for building a multi-qubit superconducting quantum circuit. It introduced a relatively large shunt capacitor to remarkably reduce the charge dispersion. Although the non-linearity is also decreased, by operating in a properly chosen EJ/Ec, transmon can greatly reduce the charge noise while only sacrificing a small amount of non-linearity. Xmon can be considered as a modified version of transmon. It is designed and optimized for multi-qubit operation and measurement with separate X/Y and Z control lines for each qubit, and a readout bus (a transmission line or a low-Q bandpass filter) for simultaneous readout of all the qubits. Fluxonium provide another solution for suppressing the charge noise in Cooper-pair box (CPB). It introduces a large shunt inductance to filter low-frequency offset charge in the small capacitor of the phase-slip junction (the small junction). To keep the qubit operating in the charge region, the shunt inductor should be large enough to keep the impedance larger than the superconducting impedance quantum RQ~1 kΩ. As a result, the inductance can only be provided by a large series of Josephson junctions. Fluxonium keeps the advantage of high anharmonicity of CPB. In addition, it introduces another degree of freedom: external flux Φext. Quasiparticles (electrons or holes) tunneling at the small junction add coherently to produce a ″1+cosφ″ term. As a result, when Φext= Φ0/2, dissipation caused by quasiparticle tunneling is suppressed and the energy relaxation time (T1) increases drastically. C-shunt flux qubit (CSFQ) decreases α and EJ to suppress flux noise in the qubit. While the charge noise becomes the dominant noise source, a large shunt capacitor is added to suppress the charge noise, similar to that in a transmon qubit. It is worth to notice that in CSFQ, the α decreases to below but near 1/2. As a result, the double-well potential no longer exists. The energy structure become similar to transmon, with the anharmonicity be opposite. CSFQ can get a much improved coherence time, while its anharmonicity can be larger than that of transmon. Those new superconducting qubit structures provide different solutions to improve the coherence time. Although it looks much different in circuit models and parameters, they have ideas in common, and may act as guides to other novel designs with longer coherence time. We can summarize as below. (1) The qubit circuit should be free of small superconducting islands. Charge fluctuation in small islands is a major source of decoherence. As a result, increase the area of the islands, that is, increase the capacitance becomes a straight forward way to suppress the charge noise. In Fluxonium, the small junction is connected with a large series of large junctions that there is also no small islands in the whole loop. (2) Remove superconducting loops in the qubit circuit, or minimize the loop size and loop current to suppress flux noise. (3) Bias the phase difference of the small junction to π, where dissipation caused by quasiparticle tunneling can be suppressed coherently. (4) Decrease the coupling bandwidth of qubit to the environment. In a circuit-QED readout scheme, a high-Q readout resonator that dispersively coupled to the qubit protects the qubit from exposed to the electromagnetic environment of the readout circuit. A ″Purcell filter″ can also be added to suppress such decoherence further. In conclusion, we overviewed some qubit engineering techniques or ideas to improve the coherence time, which is a very important figure for building practical quantum computer/simulator. We hope that someone can combine and optimize these ideas, while interact with developments in materials and micro-fabrication technologies, to develop novel new generation superconducting qubit structures in the near future.

Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)•Sep 27, 2017•2 citations

Scalable solid–state qubits: challenging decoherence and read–out

Goran P. Wendin

We review some basic facts about qubits and qubit processing. After a brief survey of solid-state qubits, we focus on quantized electrical circuits and superconducting qubits based on Josephson junctions. We review the general framework and indicate how the various qubits, such as the superconducting Cooper pair box charge qubit, the persistent current flux qubit, the hybrid charge-phase qubit, and the Andreev-level qubit, can be seen to appear due to different choices of design parameters. Finally, we consider multi-qubit systems and discuss some aspects of decoherence.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Jul 15, 2003•9 citations

Materials in superconducting quantum circuits

Kanglin Xiong, Jiagui Feng, Yarui Zheng +5 more

Superconducting quantum circuits (SQCs), composed of superconducting capacitors, inductances, Josephson junctions, and transmission lines, exhibit macroscopic quantum effects at ultra-low temperatures. Due to the extremely low dissipation of superconductors, an important application of SQCs is superconducting qubits with long coherence time. Quantum computing based on superconducting qubits is a leading physical realization method of quantum computing, which is theoretically capable of accelerating many computational problems including quantum simulation, database searching, and optimization. In the long run, to use the power of quantum computing to its full extent, universal quantum computers should be constructed with quantum error correction. In the short term, one of the most pressing targets of the superconducting quantum computing community is to demonstrate quantum advantage using noisy intermediate-scale quantum chips. Both goals rely on the increasing of the number of coupled qubits in a quantum circuit and the quality of these qubits, which dictate the breadth and the depth of a problem it can solve, respectively. The fabrication of SQCs has adopted a few manufacturing processes from conventional integrated circuits. Quantum chips containing multiple superconducting qubits can be made and packaged on a large scale. “Quantum supremacy” has been demonstrated on a quantum chip with fifty-three qubits fabricated using the flip-chip bonding technology. However, to demonstrate quantum advantage, the quality and quantity of qubits need to increase simultaneously. Dissipative channels emerge in circuit design, material preparation, chip fabrication, and working environment, limiting the lifetime of superconducting qubits. For quantum chips with tens to hundreds of qubits, the integration will also introduce extra processing steps which may degrade the qubits, and unwanted coupling to loss channels. Most of these channels are microscopically related to materials constructing the quantum chips, chip surfaces, and material interfaces. Thus, it is important to investigate the material growth and device fabrication of SQCs, and to understand the material related loss mechanisms. This review paper investigates the material related topics in superconducting quantum circuits pertinent to the quantum computing application from a comprehensive perspective. The history of SQCs is briefly mentioned, followed by the peculiar characteristics as an engineerable quantum system, and a roadmap to quantum advantage and universal quantum computing in the next a few years. Technically, the superconducting quantum computer is compared to a Schrodinger’s cat, and can be boiled down into three parts, i.e., quantum chips, the environment, and the operating system, corresponding to the cat, the box, and the observer, respectively. The material related decoherence channels of the SQCs can be sorted into four categories; each will be discussed in details. To fabricate SQCs with minimal loss, the processing technologies are elaborated, including qubit design, material selection, surface treatments, film growth, and Josephson junction, etc. Though there are general guidelines that amorphous materials should be avoided and processing induced damage should be minimized, more is to be investigated due to the emerging of new materials and new fabrication methods. The last part presents the potential application of the superconducting quantum computer and its current state of play. SQC for quantum computing is a multi-discipline research topic, demanding joint efforts from different scientific and technical areas. Materials science and device processing will play important roles along the way to quantum practicality.

Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)•Jul 20, 2021•10 citations
Superconducting qubits are solid state electrical circuits fabricated using techniques borrowed from conventional integrated circuits. They are based on the Josephson tunnel junction, the only non-dissipative, strongly non-linear circuit element available at low temperature. In contrast to microscopic entities such as spins or atoms, they tend to be well coupled to other circuits, which make them appealling from the point of view of readout and gate implementation. Very recently, new designs of superconducting qubits based on multi-junction circuits have solved the problem of isolation from unwanted extrinsic electromagnetic perturbations. We discuss in this review how qubit decoherence is affected by the intrinsic noise of the junction and what can be done to improve it.
Superconducting qubits have in recent years become a promising candidate for the implementation of a quantum computer due to their design flexibility, good protection from decohering elementary excitations, and availability of well developed fabrication and measurement techniques. Superconducting flux qubits, for which the effect of offset charge noise is reduced due to the fact that the Josephson energy dominates over the charging energy, correspond to one of the proposed means of designing a superconducting qubit. A nonlinear dispersive readout scheme of flux qubits involving a DC SQUID magnetometer that avoids the effects of on-chip dissipation can be readily implemented, yielding high contrast output for single qubit readout. Coupling schemes via nonlinear Josephson elements have also been realized. On the other hand, while the means of isolating superconducting qubits from external noise sources has been found, the mechanisms by which they undergo relaxation and decoherence due to intrinsic noise sources in the junctions themselves are not very well understood, and the question of how to deal with these noise sources remains unanswered in the general case. Other questions deal with the problem of experimentally observing entanglement in an array of coupled superconducting qubits, and finding the means by which the existence of entanglement in a typical laboratory setup may to some extent be verified by measurements on a global scale. Following a brief introductory review, we will first investigate the influence of a Two-Level Fluctuator on a DC SQUID driven by a finite current bias. Then we introduce a directly measurable signature of multiqubit entanglement for a large system of qubits and show that it is compatible to a recently introduced measure of global entanglement.
Superconducting integrated circuits incorporating Josephson junctions are an attractive candidate for scalable quantum information processing in the solid state. The strong nonlinearity of the Josephson effect enables one to tailor an anharmonic potential and thus to realize an artificial quantum two-level system (“qubit”) from a macroscopic superconducting circuit. Josephson qubits can be made to interact strongly and controllably, and it should be straightforward to fabricate circuits incorporating hundreds or even thousands of Josephson qubits using standard thin-film processing techniques. Work over the last several years has shown that qubit performance is limited by spurious coupling of the qubit to microscopic defect states in the materials that are used to implement the circuit. Here we discuss the materials origins of dissipation and dephasing in superconducting qubits. A deeper understanding of the underlying materials physics that governs decoherence in superconducting quantum circuits will guide the search for improved, low-noise materials and fuel continued progress in the field of superconducting quantum computing.
Superconducting qubits are Josephson junction-based circuits that exhibit macroscopic quantum behavior and can be manipulated as artificial atoms. Benefiting from the well-developed technology of microfabrication and microwave engineering, superconducting qubits have great advantages in design flexibility, controllability, and scalability. Over the past decade, there has been rapid progress in the field, which greatly improved our understanding of qubit decoherence and circuit optimization. The single-qubit coherence time has been steadily raised to the order of 10 to 100 μs, allowing for the demonstration of high-fidelity gate operations and measurement-based feedback control. Here we review recent progress in the coherence and readout of superconducting qubits.
Superconducting quantum computing is a solid state quantum computing technology based on Josephson junction circuits. It becomes one of the most promising candidates for realizing practical quantum computer/simulator, because of its scalability, easy to coupling and control, compatibility to semiconductor technologies, etc. As the complicated electromagnetic environment in solid state metal and insulator, superconducting quantum bits (qubits) suffered from shot coherence time since its early development. In this review, we described some recently developed superconducting qubit structures, including Transmon/Xmon, Fluxonium and C-shunt flux qubit. Although these new qubit structures have very different circuit parameters and energy scales, they all find their way to effectively suppress environmental noises. As a result, their coherence time were improved significantly. Transmon, a transmission-line shunted plasma oscillation qubit, was now among the most popular structures for building a multi-qubit superconducting quantum circuit. It introduced a relatively large shunt capacitor to remarkably reduce the charge dispersion. Although the non-linearity is also decreased, by operating in a properly chosen EJ/Ec, transmon can greatly reduce the charge noise while only sacrificing a small amount of non-linearity. Xmon can be considered as a modified version of transmon. It is designed and optimized for multi-qubit operation and measurement with separate X/Y and Z control lines for each qubit, and a readout bus (a transmission line or a low-Q bandpass filter) for simultaneous readout of all the qubits. Fluxonium provide another solution for suppressing the charge noise in Cooper-pair box (CPB). It introduces a large shunt inductance to filter low-frequency offset charge in the small capacitor of the phase-slip junction (the small junction). To keep the qubit operating in the charge region, the shunt inductor should be large enough to keep the impedance larger than the superconducting impedance quantum RQ~1 kΩ. As a result, the inductance can only be provided by a large series of Josephson junctions. Fluxonium keeps the advantage of high anharmonicity of CPB. In addition, it introduces another degree of freedom: external flux Φext. Quasiparticles (electrons or holes) tunneling at the small junction add coherently to produce a ″1+cosφ″ term. As a result, when Φext= Φ0/2, dissipation caused by quasiparticle tunneling is suppressed and the energy relaxation time (T1) increases drastically. C-shunt flux qubit (CSFQ) decreases α and EJ to suppress flux noise in the qubit. While the charge noise becomes the dominant noise source, a large shunt capacitor is added to suppress the charge noise, similar to that in a transmon qubit. It is worth to notice that in CSFQ, the α decreases to below but near 1/2. As a result, the double-well potential no longer exists. The energy structure become similar to transmon, with the anharmonicity be opposite. CSFQ can get a much improved coherence time, while its anharmonicity can be larger than that of transmon. Those new superconducting qubit structures provide different solutions to improve the coherence time. Although it looks much different in circuit models and parameters, they have ideas in common, and may act as guides to other novel designs with longer coherence time. We can summarize as below. (1) The qubit circuit should be free of small superconducting islands. Charge fluctuation in small islands is a major source of decoherence. As a result, increase the area of the islands, that is, increase the capacitance becomes a straight forward way to suppress the charge noise. In Fluxonium, the small junction is connected with a large series of large junctions that there is also no small islands in the whole loop. (2) Remove superconducting loops in the qubit circuit, or minimize the loop size and loop current to suppress flux noise. (3) Bias the phase difference of the small junction to π, where dissipation caused by quasiparticle tunneling can be suppressed coherently. (4) Decrease the coupling bandwidth of qubit to the environment. In a circuit-QED readout scheme, a high-Q readout resonator that dispersively coupled to the qubit protects the qubit from exposed to the electromagnetic environment of the readout circuit. A ″Purcell filter″ can also be added to suppress such decoherence further. In conclusion, we overviewed some qubit engineering techniques or ideas to improve the coherence time, which is a very important figure for building practical quantum computer/simulator. We hope that someone can combine and optimize these ideas, while interact with developments in materials and micro-fabrication technologies, to develop novel new generation superconducting qubit structures in the near future.
We review some basic facts about qubits and qubit processing. After a brief survey of solid-state qubits, we focus on quantized electrical circuits and superconducting qubits based on Josephson junctions. We review the general framework and indicate how the various qubits, such as the superconducting Cooper pair box charge qubit, the persistent current flux qubit, the hybrid charge-phase qubit, and the Andreev-level qubit, can be seen to appear due to different choices of design parameters. Finally, we consider multi-qubit systems and discuss some aspects of decoherence.
Superconducting quantum circuits (SQCs), composed of superconducting capacitors, inductances, Josephson junctions, and transmission lines, exhibit macroscopic quantum effects at ultra-low temperatures. Due to the extremely low dissipation of superconductors, an important application of SQCs is superconducting qubits with long coherence time. Quantum computing based on superconducting qubits is a leading physical realization method of quantum computing, which is theoretically capable of accelerating many computational problems including quantum simulation, database searching, and optimization. In the long run, to use the power of quantum computing to its full extent, universal quantum computers should be constructed with quantum error correction. In the short term, one of the most pressing targets of the superconducting quantum computing community is to demonstrate quantum advantage using noisy intermediate-scale quantum chips. Both goals rely on the increasing of the number of coupled qubits in a quantum circuit and the quality of these qubits, which dictate the breadth and the depth of a problem it can solve, respectively. The fabrication of SQCs has adopted a few manufacturing processes from conventional integrated circuits. Quantum chips containing multiple superconducting qubits can be made and packaged on a large scale. “Quantum supremacy” has been demonstrated on a quantum chip with fifty-three qubits fabricated using the flip-chip bonding technology. However, to demonstrate quantum advantage, the quality and quantity of qubits need to increase simultaneously. Dissipative channels emerge in circuit design, material preparation, chip fabrication, and working environment, limiting the lifetime of superconducting qubits. For quantum chips with tens to hundreds of qubits, the integration will also introduce extra processing steps which may degrade the qubits, and unwanted coupling to loss channels. Most of these channels are microscopically related to materials constructing the quantum chips, chip surfaces, and material interfaces. Thus, it is important to investigate the material growth and device fabrication of SQCs, and to understand the material related loss mechanisms. This review paper investigates the material related topics in superconducting quantum circuits pertinent to the quantum computing application from a comprehensive perspective. The history of SQCs is briefly mentioned, followed by the peculiar characteristics as an engineerable quantum system, and a roadmap to quantum advantage and universal quantum computing in the next a few years. Technically, the superconducting quantum computer is compared to a Schrodinger’s cat, and can be boiled down into three parts, i.e., quantum chips, the environment, and the operating system, corresponding to the cat, the box, and the observer, respectively. The material related decoherence channels of the SQCs can be sorted into four categories; each will be discussed in details. To fabricate SQCs with minimal loss, the processing technologies are elaborated, including qubit design, material selection, surface treatments, film growth, and Josephson junction, etc. Though there are general guidelines that amorphous materials should be avoided and processing induced damage should be minimized, more is to be investigated due to the emerging of new materials and new fabrication methods. The last part presents the potential application of the superconducting quantum computer and its current state of play. SQC for quantum computing is a multi-discipline research topic, demanding joint efforts from different scientific and technical areas. Materials science and device processing will play important roles along the way to quantum practicality.