Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0409267 · Computer Physics Communications

Geometrical phase transitions

Wolfhard Janke E, Adriaan M. J. Schakel

Published Apr 8, 2005• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.cpc.2005.03.051

Related papers

Geometrical approach to phase transitions in frustrated and unfrustrated systems

Antonio Coniglio A

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Jun 1, 2000•23 citations

Geometric entanglement and quantum phase transitions in two-dimensional quantum lattice models

Qian‐Qian Shi, Honglei Wang, Sheng-Hao Li +3 more

Geometric entanglement (GE), as a measure of multipartite entanglement, has been investigated as a universal tool to detect phase transitions in quantum many-body lattice models. In this paper we outline a systematic method to compute GE for two-dimensional (2D) quantum many-body lattice models based on the translational invariant structure of infinite projected entangled pair state (iPEPS) representations. By employing this method, the $q$-state quantum Potts model on the square lattice with $q\ensuremath{\in}{2,3,4,5}$ is investigated as a prototypical example. Further, we have explored three 2D Heisenberg models: the antiferromagnetic spin-1/2 $XXX$ and anisotropic $XYX$ models in an external magnetic field, and the antiferromagnetic spin-1 $XXZ$ model. We find that continuous GE does not guarantee a continuous phase transition across a phase transition point. We observe and thus classify three different types of continuous GE across a phase transition point: (i) GE is continuous with maximum value at the transition point and the phase transition is continuous, (ii) GE is continuous with maximum value at the transition point but the phase transition is discontinuous, and (iii) GE is continuous with nonmaximum value at the transition point and the phase transition is continuous. For the models under consideration, we find that the second and the third types are related to a point of dual symmetry and a fully polarized phase, respectively.

arXiv:1604.07278•Physical Review A•Jun 27, 2016•14 citations

Thermodynamic versus Geometric Phase Transitions

Jean Ruiz

•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

First-Order Phase Transitions

Wolfhard Janke E

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•33 citations

Identifying quantum phase transitions via geometric measures of nonclassicality

Kok Chuan Tan

It is shown that divergences in the susceptibility of any geometric measure of nonclassicality are sufficient conditions to identify phase transitions at arbitrary temperature. This establishes that geometric measures of nonclassicality, in any quantum resource theory, are generic tools to investigate phase transitions in quantum systems. For the zero-temperature case, we show that geometric measures of quantum coherence are especially useful for identifying first-order quantum phase transitions and can be a particularly robust alternative to other approaches employing measures of quantum correlations.

arXiv:2003.04527•Physical Review A•Aug 24, 2020•8 citations

Phase Transitions

Pedro D Sacramento

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations
Geometric entanglement (GE), as a measure of multipartite entanglement, has been investigated as a universal tool to detect phase transitions in quantum many-body lattice models. In this paper we outline a systematic method to compute GE for two-dimensional (2D) quantum many-body lattice models based on the translational invariant structure of infinite projected entangled pair state (iPEPS) representations. By employing this method, the qqq-state quantum Potts model on the square lattice with $q\ensuremath{\in}{2,3,4,5}$ is investigated as a prototypical example. Further, we have explored three 2D Heisenberg models: the antiferromagnetic spin-1/2 XXXXXXXXX and anisotropic XYXXYXXYX models in an external magnetic field, and the antiferromagnetic spin-1 XXZXXZXXZ model. We find that continuous GE does not guarantee a continuous phase transition across a phase transition point. We observe and thus classify three different types of continuous GE across a phase transition point: (i) GE is continuous with maximum value at the transition point and the phase transition is continuous, (ii) GE is continuous with maximum value at the transition point but the phase transition is discontinuous, and (iii) GE is continuous with nonmaximum value at the transition point and the phase transition is continuous. For the models under consideration, we find that the second and the third types are related to a point of dual symmetry and a fully polarized phase, respectively.
It is shown that divergences in the susceptibility of any geometric measure of nonclassicality are sufficient conditions to identify phase transitions at arbitrary temperature. This establishes that geometric measures of nonclassicality, in any quantum resource theory, are generic tools to investigate phase transitions in quantum systems. For the zero-temperature case, we show that geometric measures of quantum coherence are especially useful for identifying first-order quantum phase transitions and can be a particularly robust alternative to other approaches employing measures of quantum correlations.