Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0404706 · Physical Review Letters

Density Matrix Renormalization Group and Periodic Boundary Conditions: A Quantum Information Perspective

Frank Verstraete, Diego Porras, J. I. Cirac

Published Nov 23, 2004• 580 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We introduce a picture to analyze the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) numerical method from a quantum information perspective. This leads to a variational formulation of DMRG which allows for dramatic improvements in the case of problems with periodic boundary conditions. The picture also explains some features of the method in terms of entanglement and teleportation.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.93.227205

Related papers

Tensor Networks: a quantum-information perspective on numerical renormalization groups

Pietro Silvi

Exact many-body quantum problems are known to be computationally hard due to the exponential scaling of the numerical resources required. Since the advent of the Density Matrix Renormalization Group, it became clear that a successful strategy to work around this obstacle was to develop numerical methods based on the well-known theoretical renormalization group. In recent years, it was realized that quantum states engineered via numerical renormalization allow a variational representation in terms of a tensor network picture. The discovery provided a further boost to the effectiveness of these techniques, not only due to the increased flexibility and manipulability, but also because tensor network states embed a direct interface to the entanglement they carry, so that one can directly address many-body quantum correlations within these variational ansatz states. This lead to the application of several numerical tools, originally developed in the field of quantum-information, to approach condensed matter problems.

arXiv:1205.4198•May 18, 2012•1 citation

Boundary effects in the density-matrix renormalization group calculation

Naokazu Shibata, Chisa Hotta

We investigate the boundary effect of the density matrix renormalization group calculation (DMRG), which is an artifactual induction of symmetry-breaking pseudo-long-range order and takes place when the long-range quantum fluctuation cannot be properly included in the variational wave function due to numerical limitation. The open boundary condition often used in DMRG suffers from the boundary effect the most severely, which is directly reflected in the distinct spatial modulations of the local physical quantity. By contrast, the other boundary conditions such as the periodic one or the ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}$-deformed interaction [A. Gendiar, R. Krcmar, and T. Nishino, Prog. Theor. Phys.122, 953 (2009)] keep spatial homogeneity, and are relatively free from the boundary effect. By comparing the numerical results of those various boundary conditions, we show that the open boundary condition sometimes gives unreliable results even after the finite-size scaling. We conclude that the examination of the boundary condition dependence is required besides the usual treatment based on the system size or accuracy dependence in cases where the long-range quantum fluctuation is important.

arXiv:1106.6202•Physical Review B•Sep 16, 2011•48 citations

The density-matrix renormalization group: a short introduction

Ulrich Schollwöck

The density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method has established itself over the last decade as the leading method for the simulation of the statics and dynamics of one-dimensional strongly correlated quantum lattice systems. The DMRG is a method that shares features of a renormalization group procedure (which here generates a flow in the space of reduced density operators) and of a variational method that operates on a highly interesting class of quantum states, so-called matrix product states (MPSs). The DMRG method is presented here entirely in the MPS language. While the DMRG generally fails in larger two-dimensional systems, the MPS picture suggests a straightforward generalization to higher dimensions in the framework of tensor network states. The resulting algorithms, however, suffer from difficulties absent in one dimension, apart from a much more unfavourable efficiency, such that their ultimate success remains far from clear at the moment.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Jun 6, 2011•52 citations

The density-matrix renormalization group: a short introduction

B Y U Lrich S Chollwöck, A Sommerfeld

The density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method has established itself over the last decade as the leading method for the simulation of the statics and dynamics of one-dimensional strongly correlated quantum lattice systems. The DMRG is a method that shares features of a renormalization group procedure (which here generates a flow in the space of reduced density operators) and of a variational method that operates on a highly interesting class of quantum states, so-called matrix product states (MPSs). The DMRG method is presented here entirely in the MPS language. While the DMRG generally fails in larger two-dimensional systems, the MPS picture suggests a straightforward generalization to higher dimensions in the framework of tensor network states. The resulting algorithms, however, suffer from difficulties absent in one dimension, apart from a much more unfavourable efficiency, such that their ultimate success remains far from clear at the moment.

•Jan 1, 2015•1 citation

Efficient matrix-product state method for periodic boundary conditions

Peter Pippan, Steven R. White, Hans Gerd Evertz

We introduce an efficient method to calculate the ground state of one-dimensional lattice models with periodic boundary conditions. The method works in the representation of matrix product states (MPS), related to the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method. It improves on a previous approach by Verstraete et al. We introduce a factorization procedure for long products of MPS matrices, which reduces the computational effort from ${m}^{5}$ to ${m}^{3}$, where $m$ is the matrix dimension, and $m\ensuremath{\simeq}100--1000$ in typical cases. We test the method on the $S=\frac{1}{2}$ and $S=1$ Heisenberg chains. It is also applicable to nontranslationally invariant cases. The method makes ground-state calculations with periodic boundary conditions about as efficient as traditional DMRG calculations for systems with open boundaries.

arXiv:0801.1947•Physical Review B•Feb 12, 2010•88 citations

Density-matrix renormalization-group technique with periodic boundary conditions for two-dimensional classical systems

Andrej Gendiar, A. Šurda

The density-matrix renormalization-group (DMRG) method with periodic boundary conditions is introduced for two-dimensional (2D) classical spin models. It is shown that this method is more suitable for derivation of the properties of infinite 2D systems than the DMRG with open boundary conditions, despite the fact that the latter describes much better strips of finite width. For calculation at criticality, phenomenological renormalization at finite strips is used together with a criterion for optimum strip width for a given order of approximation. For this width the critical temperature of the 2D Ising model is estimated with seven-digit accuracy for a not too large order of approximation. Similar precision is reached for critical exponents. These results exceed the accuracy of similar calculations for the DMRG with open boundary conditions by several orders of magnitude. The method is applied to the calculation of critical exponents of the $q=3,$ 4 Potts model, as well.

arXiv:cond-mat/0004024•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Dec 11, 2000•4 citations
We introduce a picture to analyze the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) numerical method from a quantum information perspective. This leads to a variational formulation of DMRG which allows for dramatic improvements in the case of problems with periodic boundary conditions. The picture also explains some features of the method in terms of entanglement and teleportation.
Exact many-body quantum problems are known to be computationally hard due to the exponential scaling of the numerical resources required. Since the advent of the Density Matrix Renormalization Group, it became clear that a successful strategy to work around this obstacle was to develop numerical methods based on the well-known theoretical renormalization group. In recent years, it was realized that quantum states engineered via numerical renormalization allow a variational representation in terms of a tensor network picture. The discovery provided a further boost to the effectiveness of these techniques, not only due to the increased flexibility and manipulability, but also because tensor network states embed a direct interface to the entanglement they carry, so that one can directly address many-body quantum correlations within these variational ansatz states. This lead to the application of several numerical tools, originally developed in the field of quantum-information, to approach condensed matter problems.
We investigate the boundary effect of the density matrix renormalization group calculation (DMRG), which is an artifactual induction of symmetry-breaking pseudo-long-range order and takes place when the long-range quantum fluctuation cannot be properly included in the variational wave function due to numerical limitation. The open boundary condition often used in DMRG suffers from the boundary effect the most severely, which is directly reflected in the distinct spatial modulations of the local physical quantity. By contrast, the other boundary conditions such as the periodic one or the sin2{\mathrm{sin}}^{2}sin2-deformed interaction [A. Gendiar, R. Krcmar, and T. Nishino, Prog. Theor. Phys.122, 953 (2009)] keep spatial homogeneity, and are relatively free from the boundary effect. By comparing the numerical results of those various boundary conditions, we show that the open boundary condition sometimes gives unreliable results even after the finite-size scaling. We conclude that the examination of the boundary condition dependence is required besides the usual treatment based on the system size or accuracy dependence in cases where the long-range quantum fluctuation is important.
The density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method has established itself over the last decade as the leading method for the simulation of the statics and dynamics of one-dimensional strongly correlated quantum lattice systems. The DMRG is a method that shares features of a renormalization group procedure (which here generates a flow in the space of reduced density operators) and of a variational method that operates on a highly interesting class of quantum states, so-called matrix product states (MPSs). The DMRG method is presented here entirely in the MPS language. While the DMRG generally fails in larger two-dimensional systems, the MPS picture suggests a straightforward generalization to higher dimensions in the framework of tensor network states. The resulting algorithms, however, suffer from difficulties absent in one dimension, apart from a much more unfavourable efficiency, such that their ultimate success remains far from clear at the moment.
The density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method has established itself over the last decade as the leading method for the simulation of the statics and dynamics of one-dimensional strongly correlated quantum lattice systems. The DMRG is a method that shares features of a renormalization group procedure (which here generates a flow in the space of reduced density operators) and of a variational method that operates on a highly interesting class of quantum states, so-called matrix product states (MPSs). The DMRG method is presented here entirely in the MPS language. While the DMRG generally fails in larger two-dimensional systems, the MPS picture suggests a straightforward generalization to higher dimensions in the framework of tensor network states. The resulting algorithms, however, suffer from difficulties absent in one dimension, apart from a much more unfavourable efficiency, such that their ultimate success remains far from clear at the moment.
We introduce an efficient method to calculate the ground state of one-dimensional lattice models with periodic boundary conditions. The method works in the representation of matrix product states (MPS), related to the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method. It improves on a previous approach by Verstraete et al. We introduce a factorization procedure for long products of MPS matrices, which reduces the computational effort from m5{m}^{5}m5 to m3{m}^{3}m3, where mmm is the matrix dimension, and $m\ensuremath{\simeq}100--1000$ in typical cases. We test the method on the S=12S=\frac{1}{2}S=21​ and S=1S=1S=1 Heisenberg chains. It is also applicable to nontranslationally invariant cases. The method makes ground-state calculations with periodic boundary conditions about as efficient as traditional DMRG calculations for systems with open boundaries.
The density-matrix renormalization-group (DMRG) method with periodic boundary conditions is introduced for two-dimensional (2D) classical spin models. It is shown that this method is more suitable for derivation of the properties of infinite 2D systems than the DMRG with open boundary conditions, despite the fact that the latter describes much better strips of finite width. For calculation at criticality, phenomenological renormalization at finite strips is used together with a criterion for optimum strip width for a given order of approximation. For this width the critical temperature of the 2D Ising model is estimated with seven-digit accuracy for a not too large order of approximation. Similar precision is reached for critical exponents. These results exceed the accuracy of similar calculations for the DMRG with open boundary conditions by several orders of magnitude. The method is applied to the calculation of critical exponents of the q=3,q=3,q=3, 4 Potts model, as well.