Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0312516

Methods for electronic-structure calculations - an overview from a reduced-density-matrix point of view

P. Ziesche, Ferenc Tasnádi

Published Dec 19, 2003• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The methods of quantum chemistry and solid state theory to solve the many-body problem are reviewed. We start with the definitions of reduced density matrices, their properties (contraction sum rules, spectral resolutions, cumulant expansion, $N$-representability), and their determining equations (contracted Schrödinger equations) and we summarize recent extensions and generalizations of the traditional quantum chemical methods, of the density functional theory, and of the quasi-particle theory: from finite to extended systems (incremental method), from density to density matrix (density matrix functional theory), from weak to strong correlation (dynamical mean field theory), from homogeneous (Kimball-Overhauser approach) to inhomogeneous and finite systems. Measures of the correlation strength are discussed. The cumulant two-body reduced density matrix proves to be a key quantity. Its spectral resolution contains geminals, being possibly the solutions of an approximate effective two-body equation, and the idea is sketched of how its contraction sum rule can be used for a variational treatment.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/0312516

Related papers

Methods for electronic‐structure calculations: Overview from a reduced‐density‐matrix point of view

P. Ziesche, Ferenc Tasnádi

Abstract The methods of quantum chemistry and solid state theory to solve the many‐body problem are reviewed. We start with the definitions of reduced density matrices, their properties (contraction sum rules, spectral resolutions, cumulant expansion, and N‐representability), and their determining equations (contracted Schrödinger equations), and we summarize recent extensions and generalizations of the traditional quantum chemical methods, of the density functional theory, and of the quasiparticle theory: from finite to extended systems (incremental method), from density‐to‐density matrix (density matrix functional theory), from weak to strong correlation (dynamical mean field theory), from homogeneous (Kimball–Overhauser approach) to inhomogeneous and finite systems. Measures of the correlation strength are discussed. The cumulant two‐body reduced density matrix proves to be a key quantity. Its spectral resolution contains geminals, possibly the solutions of an approximate effective two‐body equation, and we sketch the idea of how its contraction sum rule can be used for a variational treatment. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2004

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 2004•2 citations

Many-Electron Densities and Reduced Density Matrices

Jerzy Ciosłowski

Preface. I: Properties of Reduced Density Matrices. 1. RDMs: How Did We Get Here? A.J. Coleman. 2. Some Theorems on Uniqueness and Reconstruction of Higher-Order Density Matrices M. Rosina. 3. Cumulant Expansions of Reduced Densities, Reduced Density Matrices, and Green's Functions P. Ziesche. 4. On Calculating Approximate and Exact Density Matrices R. Erdahl, B. Jin. II: The Contracted Schroedinger Equation. 5. Density Equation Theory in Chemical Physics H. Nakatsuji. 6. Critical Questions Concerning Iterative Solution of the Contracted Schroedinger Equation C. Valdemoro, L.M. Tel, E. Perez-Romero 7. Cumulants and the Contracted Schroedinger Equation D.A. Mazziotti.. III: Density Matrix Functional Theory. 8. Natural Orbital Functional Theory S. Goedecker, C.J. Umrigar. 9. The Pair Density in Approximate Density Functional Theory: The Hidden Agent N.T. Maitra, K. Burke. 10. Functional N-representability in Density Matrix and Density Functional Theory: An Illustration for Hooke's Atom E.V. Ludena, V. Karasiev, A. Artemiev, D. Gomez.. IV: Electron Intracule and Extracule Densities. 11. Intracule and Extracule Densities: Historical Perspectives and Future Prospects E. Valderrama, J.M. Ugalde, R.J. Boyd. 12. Topology of Electron Correlation J. Cioslowski. 13. Electron-Pair Densities of Atoms T. Koga. Index.

•Nov 2, 2012•155 citations

Variational approach for the electronic structure calculation on the second-order reduced density matrices and the $N$-representability problem

Maho Nakata, Mituhiro Fukuda, Katsuki Fujisawa

The reduced-density-matrix method is an promising candidate for the next generation electronic structure calculation method; it is equivalent to solve the Schrödinger equation for the ground state. The number of variables is the same as a four electron system and constant regardless of the electrons in the system. Thus many researchers have been dreaming of a much simpler method for quantum mechanics. In this chapter, we give a overview of the reduced-density matrix method; details of the theories, methods, history, and some new computational results. Typically, the results are comparable to the CCSD(T) which is a sophisticated traditional approach in quantum chemistry.

arXiv:1010.4095•Oct 20, 2010•5 citations

Cumulant approach to the direct calculation of reduced density matrices: A critical analysis

Marcel Nooijen, Mark Wladyslawski, Anirban Hazra

In this paper we address a number of topics regarding the contracted Schrödinger equation (CSE): (i) The cumulant expansion of reduced density matrices (RDMs), and the reduction of the CSE to a connected form. (ii) The comparison of the resulting formalism to coupled cluster theory. (iii) The direct calculation of the two-particle RDM in terms of the cumulants, without explicitly imposing any N-representability conditions. We explore a number of approximations, the most elaborate of which is the 3,5-CSE in which the cumulant expansion is carried out to the three-particle level, and the only approximation made is to equate the four- and five-particle cumulants to zero. Overall the numerical results we present for selected small model systems are found to be disappointing and we provide a critical analysis of the perceived shortcomings of our cumulant approach to the CSE.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 28, 2003•42 citations

Reduced density matrices, their spectral resolutions, and the Kimball‐Overhauser approach

P. Ziesche, Ferenc Tasnádi

Abstract Recently, it has been shown, that the pair density of the homogeneous electron gas can be parametrized in terms of 2‐body wave functions (geminals), which are scattering solutions of an effective 2‐body Schrödinger equation. For the corresponding scattering phase shifts, new sum rules are reported in this paper. These sum rules describe not only the normalization of the pair density (similar to the Friedel sum rule of solid state theory), but also the contraction of the 2‐body reduced density matrix. This allows one to calculate also the momentum distribution, provided that the geminals are known from an appropriate screening of the Coulomb repulsion. An analysis is presented leading from the definitions and (contraction and spectral) properties of reduced density matrices to the Kimball‐Overhauser approach and its generalizations. Thereby cumulants are used. Their size‐extensivity is related to the thermodynamic limit. See erratum Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 13, 624 (2004)

Annalen der Physik•Apr 1, 2004•0 citations

Solving the strong-correlation problem in materials

Eva Pavarini

Abstract This article is a short introduction to the modern computational techniques used to tackle the many-body problem in materials. The aim is to present the basic ideas, using simple examples to illustrate strengths and weaknesses of each method. We will start from density-functional theory (DFT) and the Kohn–Sham construction—the standard computational tools for performing electronic structure calculations. Leaving the realm of rigorous density-functional theory, we will discuss the established practice of adopting the Kohn–Sham Hamiltonian as approximate model. After recalling the triumphs of the Kohn–Sham description, we will stress the fundamental reasons of its failure for strongly-correlated compounds, and discuss the strategies adopted to overcome the problem. The article will then focus on the most effective method so far, the DFT+DMFT technique and its extensions. Achievements, open issues and possible future developments will be reviewed. The key differences between dynamical (DFT+DMFT) and static (DFT+ U ) mean-field methods will be elucidated. In the conclusion, we will assess the apparent dichotomy between first-principles and model-based techniques, emphasizing the common ground that in fact they share.

Rivista Del Nuovo Cimento•Jul 14, 2021•25 citations
The methods of quantum chemistry and solid state theory to solve the many-body problem are reviewed. We start with the definitions of reduced density matrices, their properties (contraction sum rules, spectral resolutions, cumulant expansion, NNN-representability), and their determining equations (contracted Schrödinger equations) and we summarize recent extensions and generalizations of the traditional quantum chemical methods, of the density functional theory, and of the quasi-particle theory: from finite to extended systems (incremental method), from density to density matrix (density matrix functional theory), from weak to strong correlation (dynamical mean field theory), from homogeneous (Kimball-Overhauser approach) to inhomogeneous and finite systems. Measures of the correlation strength are discussed. The cumulant two-body reduced density matrix proves to be a key quantity. Its spectral resolution contains geminals, being possibly the solutions of an approximate effective two-body equation, and the idea is sketched of how its contraction sum rule can be used for a variational treatment.
Abstract The methods of quantum chemistry and solid state theory to solve the many‐body problem are reviewed. We start with the definitions of reduced density matrices, their properties (contraction sum rules, spectral resolutions, cumulant expansion, and N‐representability), and their determining equations (contracted Schrödinger equations), and we summarize recent extensions and generalizations of the traditional quantum chemical methods, of the density functional theory, and of the quasiparticle theory: from finite to extended systems (incremental method), from density‐to‐density matrix (density matrix functional theory), from weak to strong correlation (dynamical mean field theory), from homogeneous (Kimball–Overhauser approach) to inhomogeneous and finite systems. Measures of the correlation strength are discussed. The cumulant two‐body reduced density matrix proves to be a key quantity. Its spectral resolution contains geminals, possibly the solutions of an approximate effective two‐body equation, and we sketch the idea of how its contraction sum rule can be used for a variational treatment. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2004
Preface. I: Properties of Reduced Density Matrices. 1. RDMs: How Did We Get Here? A.J. Coleman. 2. Some Theorems on Uniqueness and Reconstruction of Higher-Order Density Matrices M. Rosina. 3. Cumulant Expansions of Reduced Densities, Reduced Density Matrices, and Green's Functions P. Ziesche. 4. On Calculating Approximate and Exact Density Matrices R. Erdahl, B. Jin. II: The Contracted Schroedinger Equation. 5. Density Equation Theory in Chemical Physics H. Nakatsuji. 6. Critical Questions Concerning Iterative Solution of the Contracted Schroedinger Equation C. Valdemoro, L.M. Tel, E. Perez-Romero 7. Cumulants and the Contracted Schroedinger Equation D.A. Mazziotti.. III: Density Matrix Functional Theory. 8. Natural Orbital Functional Theory S. Goedecker, C.J. Umrigar. 9. The Pair Density in Approximate Density Functional Theory: The Hidden Agent N.T. Maitra, K. Burke. 10. Functional N-representability in Density Matrix and Density Functional Theory: An Illustration for Hooke's Atom E.V. Ludena, V. Karasiev, A. Artemiev, D. Gomez.. IV: Electron Intracule and Extracule Densities. 11. Intracule and Extracule Densities: Historical Perspectives and Future Prospects E. Valderrama, J.M. Ugalde, R.J. Boyd. 12. Topology of Electron Correlation J. Cioslowski. 13. Electron-Pair Densities of Atoms T. Koga. Index.
Variational approach for the electronic structure calculation on the second-order reduced density matrices and the NNN-representability problem
The reduced-density-matrix method is an promising candidate for the next generation electronic structure calculation method; it is equivalent to solve the Schrödinger equation for the ground state. The number of variables is the same as a four electron system and constant regardless of the electrons in the system. Thus many researchers have been dreaming of a much simpler method for quantum mechanics. In this chapter, we give a overview of the reduced-density matrix method; details of the theories, methods, history, and some new computational results. Typically, the results are comparable to the CCSD(T) which is a sophisticated traditional approach in quantum chemistry.
In this paper we address a number of topics regarding the contracted Schrödinger equation (CSE): (i) The cumulant expansion of reduced density matrices (RDMs), and the reduction of the CSE to a connected form. (ii) The comparison of the resulting formalism to coupled cluster theory. (iii) The direct calculation of the two-particle RDM in terms of the cumulants, without explicitly imposing any N-representability conditions. We explore a number of approximations, the most elaborate of which is the 3,5-CSE in which the cumulant expansion is carried out to the three-particle level, and the only approximation made is to equate the four- and five-particle cumulants to zero. Overall the numerical results we present for selected small model systems are found to be disappointing and we provide a critical analysis of the perceived shortcomings of our cumulant approach to the CSE.
Abstract Recently, it has been shown, that the pair density of the homogeneous electron gas can be parametrized in terms of 2‐body wave functions (geminals), which are scattering solutions of an effective 2‐body Schrödinger equation. For the corresponding scattering phase shifts, new sum rules are reported in this paper. These sum rules describe not only the normalization of the pair density (similar to the Friedel sum rule of solid state theory), but also the contraction of the 2‐body reduced density matrix. This allows one to calculate also the momentum distribution, provided that the geminals are known from an appropriate screening of the Coulomb repulsion. An analysis is presented leading from the definitions and (contraction and spectral) properties of reduced density matrices to the Kimball‐Overhauser approach and its generalizations. Thereby cumulants are used. Their size‐extensivity is related to the thermodynamic limit. See erratum Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 13, 624 (2004)
Abstract This article is a short introduction to the modern computational techniques used to tackle the many-body problem in materials. The aim is to present the basic ideas, using simple examples to illustrate strengths and weaknesses of each method. We will start from density-functional theory (DFT) and the Kohn–Sham construction—the standard computational tools for performing electronic structure calculations. Leaving the realm of rigorous density-functional theory, we will discuss the established practice of adopting the Kohn–Sham Hamiltonian as approximate model. After recalling the triumphs of the Kohn–Sham description, we will stress the fundamental reasons of its failure for strongly-correlated compounds, and discuss the strategies adopted to overcome the problem. The article will then focus on the most effective method so far, the DFT+DMFT technique and its extensions. Achievements, open issues and possible future developments will be reviewed. The key differences between dynamical (DFT+DMFT) and static (DFT+ U ) mean-field methods will be elucidated. In the conclusion, we will assess the apparent dichotomy between first-principles and model-based techniques, emphasizing the common ground that in fact they share.