Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0112456 · Physical review. B, Condensed matter

BCS and generalized BCS superconductivity in relativistic quantum field theory: Formulation

Tadafumi Ohsaku

Published Dec 19, 2001• 35 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We investigate the BCS and generalized BCS theories in the relativistic quantum field theory. We select the gauge freedom as $U(1),$ and introduce a BCS-type effective attractive interaction. After introducing the Gor'kov formalism and performing the group theoretical consideration of the mean fields, we solve the relativistic Gor'kov equation and obtain the Green's functions in analytical forms. We obtain various types of gap equations.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.65.024512

Related papers

General pairing theory for condensed and noncondensed Cooper pairs of a superconductor in a high magnetic field

Peter Scherpelz, Dan Wulin, Břetislav Šopík +2 more

We extend Gor'kov theory to address superconducting pairing at high magnetic fields and general temperatures with arbitrary attractive interaction strength. This analysis begins with an interpretation of the high-field Gor'kov gap equation which we associate with an instability in a generalized particle-particle ladder series. Importantly, this interpretation of the nonlinear gap equation enables a treatment of pairing which is distinct from condensation. We also show how to consolidate two distinct fermionic pairing schemes in real and momentum space, both corresponding to an Abrikosov lattice. Numerical results for the fermionic local density of states demonstrate that gapless structure in a field is robust and presumably relevant to quantum oscillation experiments. We find that despite their differences, both pairing schemes contain very similar physics. Our formalism is designed to explore a variety of magnetic field effects in the so-called pseudogap phase and throughout the BCS-BEC crossover.

arXiv:1112.1112•Physical Review B•Jan 28, 2013•6 citations

Gor'kov-Hedin-Baym equations for quantum many-body systems with spin-dependent interactions

Christopher Lane

Driven by the need to understand and determine the presence of non-trivial superconductivity in real candidate materials, we present a generalized set of self-consistent Gor'kov-Hedin-Baym equations with spin dependent electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions. This extends Hedin's original equations to treat quantum many-body systems where electronic and lattice correlations along with relativistic effects coexist on the same footing with superconductivity. The leading order self-energies yields a generalization of the Migdal-Eliashberg theory and by iterating this set of equations generalized ladder vertex corrections naturally emerge.

arXiv:2506.07302•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Mar 20, 2026•1 citation

Time-Dependent BCS Hamiltonian and Gor’kov Equations

Giancarlo Calvanese Strinati

This chapter considers the analog of the time-dependent Hartree–Fock (mean-field) decoupling treated in Part I and extends it to the broken-symmetry phase for superfluid fermions. Two coupled equations for the “normal” and “anomalous” time-dependent single-particle Green’s functions are obtained, which extend to nonequilibrium situations the equations originally obtained at equilibrium by Gor’kov, soon after the BCS original article on the theory of superconductivity. Accordingly, the time-dependent gap (order) parameter is also introduced.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 6, 2026•0 citations

Superconductivity from four Fermion complexes

Kleinert, P.

Superconductivity is studied for a fermionic system with attractive four-body interaction. Applying a Green function approach, the gap equation is derived. From the solution, the transition temperature is calculated. Under the condition that the respective coupling constants are comparable, the transition temperature of four-fermion complexes is considerably larger than the corresponding BCS value.

arXiv:0802.1271•Feb 11, 2008•0 citations

N-quantum approach to the BCS theory of superconductivity

Oscar Wallace Greenberg

A method of general applicability to the solution of second-quantized field theories at finite temperature is illustrated using the BCS (Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer) model of superconductivity. Finite-temperature field theory is treated using the thermo field-theory formalism of Umezawa and collaborators. The solution of the field theory uses an expansion in thermal modes analogous to the Haag expansion in asymptotic fields used in the N-quantum approximation at zero temperature. The lowest approximation gives the usual gap equation.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1994•2 citations

BCS Theory of Superconductivity

A. S. Alexandrov, Nevill Mott

The crucial demonstration that superfluidity was linked to Bose particles and Bose-Einstein condensation came after the discovery of He3 in 1949, which failed to show the characteristic A transition within a reasonable wide temperature interval around the critical temperature for the onset of superfluidity in He4. The idea of the bosonization of electrons due to their pairing, introduced by Ogg (1946) became very attractive as an explanation for superconductivity after Schafroth (1955) showed that a gas of charged bosons with charge 2e would indeed show a Meissner effect, which is one of the most crucial features of superconductors (see Chapter 1). However this phenomenological Bose-gas picture was condemned and later on practically forgotten because it was unable to account quantitatively for the critical parameters of the classical (low-temperature) superconductors. Using for Tc the Bose-Einstein condensation temperature Eq.(l.S) one obtains the utterly meaningless result Tc = lOOOO.R&s; with the atomic density of electron pairs ~ 1022cm~3 and with the effective mass m** = 2me. The failure of the Schafroth picture stems from a very large size £ of pairs in classical superconductors, which can be estimated from the uncertainty principle: The uncertainty of the momentum 8p is estimated from the uncertainty of the kinetic energy 8E ~ vpSp, which should be of the order of Tc, the only characteristic energy of the superconducting state. Therefore and turns out to be more than one micron for simple metals with Tc ~ IK and the Fermi velocity VF — I0scm/s. That means that pairs in classical superconductors overlap strongly and the Shafroth model of real space pairs is wrong. The finally successful theory for classical superconductors was formulated by Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer (1957). In this chapter we present the main points of the BCS theory, using the Bogoliubov transformation (1947,1958) for the weak-coupling regime and the Green&s;s function technique for the intermediate coupling in Chapter 3. More details will be found in the excellent books by Schrieffer(1965), De Gennes (1989) and Abrikosov, Gor&s;kov and Dzyaloshinskii (1963).

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Nov 24, 1994•0 citations
We investigate the BCS and generalized BCS theories in the relativistic quantum field theory. We select the gauge freedom as U(1),U(1),U(1), and introduce a BCS-type effective attractive interaction. After introducing the Gor'kov formalism and performing the group theoretical consideration of the mean fields, we solve the relativistic Gor'kov equation and obtain the Green's functions in analytical forms. We obtain various types of gap equations.
We extend Gor'kov theory to address superconducting pairing at high magnetic fields and general temperatures with arbitrary attractive interaction strength. This analysis begins with an interpretation of the high-field Gor'kov gap equation which we associate with an instability in a generalized particle-particle ladder series. Importantly, this interpretation of the nonlinear gap equation enables a treatment of pairing which is distinct from condensation. We also show how to consolidate two distinct fermionic pairing schemes in real and momentum space, both corresponding to an Abrikosov lattice. Numerical results for the fermionic local density of states demonstrate that gapless structure in a field is robust and presumably relevant to quantum oscillation experiments. We find that despite their differences, both pairing schemes contain very similar physics. Our formalism is designed to explore a variety of magnetic field effects in the so-called pseudogap phase and throughout the BCS-BEC crossover.
Driven by the need to understand and determine the presence of non-trivial superconductivity in real candidate materials, we present a generalized set of self-consistent Gor'kov-Hedin-Baym equations with spin dependent electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions. This extends Hedin's original equations to treat quantum many-body systems where electronic and lattice correlations along with relativistic effects coexist on the same footing with superconductivity. The leading order self-energies yields a generalization of the Migdal-Eliashberg theory and by iterating this set of equations generalized ladder vertex corrections naturally emerge.
This chapter considers the analog of the time-dependent Hartree–Fock (mean-field) decoupling treated in Part I and extends it to the broken-symmetry phase for superfluid fermions. Two coupled equations for the “normal” and “anomalous” time-dependent single-particle Green’s functions are obtained, which extend to nonequilibrium situations the equations originally obtained at equilibrium by Gor’kov, soon after the BCS original article on the theory of superconductivity. Accordingly, the time-dependent gap (order) parameter is also introduced.
A method of general applicability to the solution of second-quantized field theories at finite temperature is illustrated using the BCS (Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer) model of superconductivity. Finite-temperature field theory is treated using the thermo field-theory formalism of Umezawa and collaborators. The solution of the field theory uses an expansion in thermal modes analogous to the Haag expansion in asymptotic fields used in the N-quantum approximation at zero temperature. The lowest approximation gives the usual gap equation.
The crucial demonstration that superfluidity was linked to Bose particles and Bose-Einstein condensation came after the discovery of He3 in 1949, which failed to show the characteristic A transition within a reasonable wide temperature interval around the critical temperature for the onset of superfluidity in He4. The idea of the bosonization of electrons due to their pairing, introduced by Ogg (1946) became very attractive as an explanation for superconductivity after Schafroth (1955) showed that a gas of charged bosons with charge 2e would indeed show a Meissner effect, which is one of the most crucial features of superconductors (see Chapter 1). However this phenomenological Bose-gas picture was condemned and later on practically forgotten because it was unable to account quantitatively for the critical parameters of the classical (low-temperature) superconductors. Using for Tc the Bose-Einstein condensation temperature Eq.(l.S) one obtains the utterly meaningless result Tc = lOOOO.R&s; with the atomic density of electron pairs ~ 1022cm~3 and with the effective mass m** = 2me. The failure of the Schafroth picture stems from a very large size £ of pairs in classical superconductors, which can be estimated from the uncertainty principle: The uncertainty of the momentum 8p is estimated from the uncertainty of the kinetic energy 8E ~ vpSp, which should be of the order of Tc, the only characteristic energy of the superconducting state. Therefore and turns out to be more than one micron for simple metals with Tc ~ IK and the Fermi velocity VF — I0scm/s. That means that pairs in classical superconductors overlap strongly and the Shafroth model of real space pairs is wrong. The finally successful theory for classical superconductors was formulated by Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer (1957). In this chapter we present the main points of the BCS theory, using the Bogoliubov transformation (1947,1958) for the weak-coupling regime and the Green&s;s function technique for the intermediate coupling in Chapter 3. More details will be found in the excellent books by Schrieffer(1965), De Gennes (1989) and Abrikosov, Gor&s;kov and Dzyaloshinskii (1963).