Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0109419 · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Quantum phase transitions of correlated electrons in two dimensions

Subir Sachdev A

Published Oct 1, 2002• 31 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/s0378-4371(02)01040-3

Related papers

Numerical studies on critical states in two dimensions and quantum phase transitions of correlated electrons in low dimensions

Yasuhiro Hatsugai

•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

Quantum phase transitions in correlated electron systems

A. F. Th. Hoekstra, John A. Mydosh

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Quantum phase transitions in strongly correlated electron systems

H. v. Löhneysen

•Jan 1, 2001•1 citation

Quantum phase transitions of correlated electrons in two dimensions

Subir Sachdev A

We review the theories of a few quantum phase transitions in two-dimensional correlated electron systems and discuss their application to the cuprate high temperature superconductors. The coupled-ladder antiferromagnet displays a transition between the Néel state and a spin gap paramagnet with a sharp S=1 exciton: we develop a careful argument which eventually establishes that this transition is described by the familiar O(3) ϕ4 field theory in 2+1 dimensions. Crucial to this argument is the role played by the quantum Berry phases. We illustrate this role in a one-dimensional example where our results can tested against those known from bosonization. On bipartite lattices in two dimensions, we study the influence of Berry phases on the quantum transition involving the loss of Néel order, and show that they induce bond-centered charge order (e.g. spin Peierls order) in the paramagnetic phase. We extend this theory of magnetic transitions in insulators to that between an ordinary d-wave superconductor and one with co-existing spin-density-wave order. Finally, we discuss quantum transitions between superconductors involving changes in the Cooper pair wave function, as in a transition between dx2−y2 and dx2−y2+idxy superconductors. A mean-field theory for this transition is provided by the usual BCS theory; however, BCS theory fails near the critical point, and we present the required field-theoretic extension. Our discussion includes a perspective on the phase diagram of the cuprate superconductors, in the context of recent experiments and the transitions discussed here.

•Jan 1, 2001•20 citations

Exact diagonalization and quantum Monte Carlo study of an ionic Hubbard model in two dimensions

Jongweon Cho, Ji-Woo Lee

We study quantum phase transitions of an ionic Hubbard model in two dimensions. The ionic Hubbard model explains the quantum states of strongly correlated electrons under the influence of checkerboard-type alternating chemical potentials. For a given amplitude of the alternating potentials Δ, we obtain quantum ground states as we tune the local repulsive energy U between a spin-up electron and a spin-down electron by using an exact diagonalization method of a modified Lanczos algorithm. The system undergoes a quantum phase transition from a band insulator to a Mott insulator as U increases at half-filling. We find the signature of a quantum phase transition by investigating the behavior of ground-state energies and that of double occupancies for the size of L × L = 4 × 4, which was the largest possible lattice in this work. We compare our results with those of quantum Monte Carlo simulations employing the Hirsch-Fye algorithm.

Journal of the Korean Physical Society•Mar 1, 2017•2 citations

Quantum Phase Transitions in Correlated Systems

Ákos Rapp

•Jan 1, 2008•1 citation
We review the theories of a few quantum phase transitions in two-dimensional correlated electron systems and discuss their application to the cuprate high temperature superconductors. The coupled-ladder antiferromagnet displays a transition between the Néel state and a spin gap paramagnet with a sharp S=1 exciton: we develop a careful argument which eventually establishes that this transition is described by the familiar O(3) ϕ4 field theory in 2+1 dimensions. Crucial to this argument is the role played by the quantum Berry phases. We illustrate this role in a one-dimensional example where our results can tested against those known from bosonization. On bipartite lattices in two dimensions, we study the influence of Berry phases on the quantum transition involving the loss of Néel order, and show that they induce bond-centered charge order (e.g. spin Peierls order) in the paramagnetic phase. We extend this theory of magnetic transitions in insulators to that between an ordinary d-wave superconductor and one with co-existing spin-density-wave order. Finally, we discuss quantum transitions between superconductors involving changes in the Cooper pair wave function, as in a transition between dx2−y2 and dx2−y2+idxy superconductors. A mean-field theory for this transition is provided by the usual BCS theory; however, BCS theory fails near the critical point, and we present the required field-theoretic extension. Our discussion includes a perspective on the phase diagram of the cuprate superconductors, in the context of recent experiments and the transitions discussed here.
We study quantum phase transitions of an ionic Hubbard model in two dimensions. The ionic Hubbard model explains the quantum states of strongly correlated electrons under the influence of checkerboard-type alternating chemical potentials. For a given amplitude of the alternating potentials Δ, we obtain quantum ground states as we tune the local repulsive energy U between a spin-up electron and a spin-down electron by using an exact diagonalization method of a modified Lanczos algorithm. The system undergoes a quantum phase transition from a band insulator to a Mott insulator as U increases at half-filling. We find the signature of a quantum phase transition by investigating the behavior of ground-state energies and that of double occupancies for the size of L × L = 4 × 4, which was the largest possible lattice in this work. We compare our results with those of quantum Monte Carlo simulations employing the Hirsch-Fye algorithm.