Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0006353 · Springer eBooks

Stability of D-Wave Superconductivity in the t- J Model

Federico Becca, Luca Capriotti, Sandro Sorella

Published Jan 1, 2001• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/978-94-010-0771-9_18

Related papers

d -wave superconductivity in the presence of nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion

Mi Jiang, Urs R. Hähner, T. C. Schulthess +1 more

Dynamic cluster quantum Monte Carlo calculations for a doped two-dimensional extended Hubbard model are used to study the stability and dynamics of $d$-wave pairing when a nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion $V$ is present in addition to the on-site Coulomb repulsion $U$. We find that $d$-wave pairing and the superconducting transition temperature ${T}_{c}$ are only weakly suppressed as long as $V$ does not exceed $U/2$. This stability is traced to the strongly retarded nature of pairing that allows the $d$-wave pairs to minimize the repulsive effect of $V$. When $V$ approaches $U/2$, large momentum charge fluctuations are found to become important and to give rise to a more rapid suppression of $d$-wave pairing and ${T}_{c}$ than for smaller $V$.

arXiv:1707.06093•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•May 17, 2018•31 citations

Enhanced d-wave Superconducting Fluctuations in the 2D t-J model

W. O. Putikka

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 17, 2006•0 citations

Enhancement of d-wave Superconductivity by t' in the Two-Dimensional Extended t-J Model

Chi-Tin Shih, Ting-Kuo Lee, R. Eder +2 more

APS•Mar 1, 2004•0 citations

Superconductivity and Instabilities in the t-t' Hubbard Model

Franz Wegner, V. Hankevych

We present a stability analysis of the 2D t-t' Hubbard model on a square lattice for t' = -t/6. We find possible phases of the model (d-wave Pomeranchuk and superconducting states, band splitting, singlet and triplet flux phases), and study the interplay of them.

arXiv:cond-mat/0205597•May 28, 2002•1 citation

Superconductivity in the t-J model in the large-N limit

R. Zeyher, A. Greco

Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter•Dec 1, 1997•9 citations

Interplay of superconductivity with structural phases in a generalized t-J model

Zeyher, R., Cappelluti, E.

The phase diagram of the t-J-V model is discussed using a 1/N expansion in terms of X operators. It is shown that a flux phase of d-wave symmetry is stabilized by the Coulomb interaction V at intermediate dopings and competes with d-wave superconductivity. Since the flux wave instability is stronger than the superconducting one optimal doping is essentially determined by the onset of the flux phase. Below optimal doping the flux phase coexists with superconductivity at low and exists as a pseudo gap phase at higher temperatures. It is also found that the flux phase boundary is much less sensitive to impurity scattering than the boundary for superconductivity in agreement with experiments in Zn doped La-214 and (Y,Ca)-123.

•Jan 1, 2000•1 citation
Dynamic cluster quantum Monte Carlo calculations for a doped two-dimensional extended Hubbard model are used to study the stability and dynamics of ddd-wave pairing when a nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion VVV is present in addition to the on-site Coulomb repulsion UUU. We find that ddd-wave pairing and the superconducting transition temperature Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ are only weakly suppressed as long as VVV does not exceed U/2U/2U/2. This stability is traced to the strongly retarded nature of pairing that allows the ddd-wave pairs to minimize the repulsive effect of VVV. When VVV approaches U/2U/2U/2, large momentum charge fluctuations are found to become important and to give rise to a more rapid suppression of ddd-wave pairing and Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ than for smaller VVV.
The phase diagram of the t-J-V model is discussed using a 1/N expansion in terms of X operators. It is shown that a flux phase of d-wave symmetry is stabilized by the Coulomb interaction V at intermediate dopings and competes with d-wave superconductivity. Since the flux wave instability is stronger than the superconducting one optimal doping is essentially determined by the onset of the flux phase. Below optimal doping the flux phase coexists with superconductivity at low and exists as a pseudo gap phase at higher temperatures. It is also found that the flux phase boundary is much less sensitive to impurity scattering than the boundary for superconductivity in agreement with experiments in Zn doped La-214 and (Y,Ca)-123.