Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:chao-dyn/9501027 · Physical Review Letters

Geometric Phases and Anholonomy for a Class of Chaotic Classical Systems

Christopher Jarzynski

Published Mar 6, 1995• 27 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Berry's phase may be viewed as arising from the parallel transport of a quantal state around a loop in parameter space. In this Letter, the classical limit of this transport is obtained for a particular class of chaotic systems. It is shown that this ``classical parallel transport'' is anholonomic---transport around a closed curve in parameter space does not bring a point in phase space back to itself---and is intimately related to the Robbins-Berry classical two-form.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.74.1732

Related papers

Geometric phase for non-Hermitian Hamiltonian evolution as anholonomy of a parallel transport along a curve

N A Sinitsyn, Avadh Saxena

We develop an interpretation of the geometric phase in evolution with a non-Hermitian real-valued Hamiltonian by relating it to the angle developed during the parallel transport along a closed curve by a unit vector triad in the 3D Minkovsky space. We also show that this geometric phase is responsible for the anholonomy effects in stochastic processes considered by Sinitsyn and Nemenman (2007 Europhys. Lett. 77 58001), and use it to derive the stochastic system response to periodic parameter variations.

arXiv:0807.3121•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Sep 2, 2008•11 citations

Some geometrical considerations of Berry’s phase

J. Anandan, Leo Stodolsky

A group-theoretic treatment is given of the new phase found by Berry in the adiabatic evolution of a quantum-mechanical system in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space. It is shown how the Berry phases for the various eigenstates of the Hamiltonian are obtained from a set of angles associated with a group element. For the special case of a two-level system there is just one such angle which corresponds to the holonomy transformation associated with parallel transport around a closed curve on a sphere.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Apr 15, 1987•111 citations

Wave mechanics and inertial guidance

I. M. Benn, R.W. Tucker

The adiabatic classical dynamics of certain constrained nonautonomous systems is discussed in terms of the transport of vectors on a surface in parameter space. The classical analogue of Berry's phase is related to the integrated geodesic curvature of a curve on such a surface and the motion of the system analyzed in terms of the relative rotation rates of different vector fields. The classical dependence of the motion on the topology of the parameter space motivates a particular quantum description of a particle confined to a closed space tube.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Mar 15, 1989•28 citations

The geometric phase for chaotic systems

Jonathan M. Robbins, Michael Berry

Abstract The geometric phase acquired by the eigenstates of cycled quantum systems is given by the flux of a two-form through a surface in the system’s parameter space. We obtain the classical limit of this two-form in a form applicable to systems whose classical dynamics is chaotic. For integrable systems the expression is equivalent to the Hannay two-form. We discuss various properties of the classical two-form, derive semiclassical corrections to it (associated with classical periodic orbits), and consider implications for the semiclassical density of degeneracies.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Mar 9, 1992•40 citations

The Pancharatnam-Berry Phase: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects

Francisco De

In 1984 Berry addressed a quantum system undergoing a unitary and cyclic evolution under the action of a time-dependent Hamiltonian (M. V. Berry, 1984). The process was supposed to be adiabatic, meaning that the time scale of the system’s evolution was much shorter than the time scale of the changing Hamiltonian. Until Berry’s study, it was assumed that for a cyclic Hamiltonian the quantum state would acquire only so-called dynamical phases, deprived of physical meaning. Such phases could be eliminated by redefining the quantum state through a “gauge” transformation of the form |ψ〉 → eiα |ψ〉. However, Berry discovered that besides the dynamical, there was an additional phase that could not be “gauged away” and whose origin was geometric or topological. It depended on the path that |ψ〉 describes in the parameter space spanned by those parameters to which the Hamiltonian owed its time dependence. Berry’s discovery was the starting point for a great amount of investigations that brought to light topological aspects of both quantum and classical systems. Berry’s phase was soon recognized as a special case of more general phases that showed up when dealing with topological aspects of different systems. For example, the Aharonov-Bohm phase could be understood as a geometric phase. The rotation angle acquired by a parallel-transported vector after completing a closed loop in a gravitationally curved space-time region, is also a geometric, Berry-like phase. Another example is the precession of the plane of oscillation of a Foucault pendulum. Berry’s original formulation was directly applicable to the case of a spin-1/2 system evolving under the action of a slowly varying magnetic field that undergoes cyclic changes. A spin-1/2 system is a special case of a two-level system. Another instances are two-level atoms and polarized light, so that also in these cases we should expect to find geometric phases. In fact, the first experimental test of Berry’s phase was done using polarized, classical light (A. Tomita, 1986). Pancharatnam (S. Pancharatnam, 1956) anticipated Berry’s phase when he proposed, back in 1956, how to decide whether two polarization states are “in phase”. Pancharatnam’s prescription is an operational one, based upon observing whether the intensity of the interferogram formed by two polarized beams has maximal intensity. In that case, the two polarized beams are said to be “in phase”. Such a definition is analogous to the definition of distant parallelism in differential geometry. Polarized states can be subjected to different transformations which could be cyclic or not, adiabatic or not, unitary or not. The Pancharatnam-Berry Phase: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects

InTech eBooks•Feb 24, 2012•16 citations

Berry’s phase and loops in parameter space

Franco Salmistraro

For a quantum system we consider the evolution induced through a Hamiltonian H(R) by an arbitrary closed curve in the space of parameters R. By a proper choice of the basis in the Hilbert space of states, it is shown that one can associate a geometrical phase to each eigenvector of the Hamiltonian. The special cases of adiabatic and cyclic evolution of the state vector are discussed.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1988•3 citations
Berry's phase may be viewed as arising from the parallel transport of a quantal state around a loop in parameter space. In this Letter, the classical limit of this transport is obtained for a particular class of chaotic systems. It is shown that this ``classical parallel transport'' is anholonomic---transport around a closed curve in parameter space does not bring a point in phase space back to itself---and is intimately related to the Robbins-Berry classical two-form.
We develop an interpretation of the geometric phase in evolution with a non-Hermitian real-valued Hamiltonian by relating it to the angle developed during the parallel transport along a closed curve by a unit vector triad in the 3D Minkovsky space. We also show that this geometric phase is responsible for the anholonomy effects in stochastic processes considered by Sinitsyn and Nemenman (2007 Europhys. Lett. 77 58001), and use it to derive the stochastic system response to periodic parameter variations.
A group-theoretic treatment is given of the new phase found by Berry in the adiabatic evolution of a quantum-mechanical system in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space. It is shown how the Berry phases for the various eigenstates of the Hamiltonian are obtained from a set of angles associated with a group element. For the special case of a two-level system there is just one such angle which corresponds to the holonomy transformation associated with parallel transport around a closed curve on a sphere.
The adiabatic classical dynamics of certain constrained nonautonomous systems is discussed in terms of the transport of vectors on a surface in parameter space. The classical analogue of Berry's phase is related to the integrated geodesic curvature of a curve on such a surface and the motion of the system analyzed in terms of the relative rotation rates of different vector fields. The classical dependence of the motion on the topology of the parameter space motivates a particular quantum description of a particle confined to a closed space tube.
Abstract The geometric phase acquired by the eigenstates of cycled quantum systems is given by the flux of a two-form through a surface in the system’s parameter space. We obtain the classical limit of this two-form in a form applicable to systems whose classical dynamics is chaotic. For integrable systems the expression is equivalent to the Hannay two-form. We discuss various properties of the classical two-form, derive semiclassical corrections to it (associated with classical periodic orbits), and consider implications for the semiclassical density of degeneracies.
In 1984 Berry addressed a quantum system undergoing a unitary and cyclic evolution under the action of a time-dependent Hamiltonian (M. V. Berry, 1984). The process was supposed to be adiabatic, meaning that the time scale of the system’s evolution was much shorter than the time scale of the changing Hamiltonian. Until Berry’s study, it was assumed that for a cyclic Hamiltonian the quantum state would acquire only so-called dynamical phases, deprived of physical meaning. Such phases could be eliminated by redefining the quantum state through a “gauge” transformation of the form |ψ〉 → eiα |ψ〉. However, Berry discovered that besides the dynamical, there was an additional phase that could not be “gauged away” and whose origin was geometric or topological. It depended on the path that |ψ〉 describes in the parameter space spanned by those parameters to which the Hamiltonian owed its time dependence. Berry’s discovery was the starting point for a great amount of investigations that brought to light topological aspects of both quantum and classical systems. Berry’s phase was soon recognized as a special case of more general phases that showed up when dealing with topological aspects of different systems. For example, the Aharonov-Bohm phase could be understood as a geometric phase. The rotation angle acquired by a parallel-transported vector after completing a closed loop in a gravitationally curved space-time region, is also a geometric, Berry-like phase. Another example is the precession of the plane of oscillation of a Foucault pendulum. Berry’s original formulation was directly applicable to the case of a spin-1/2 system evolving under the action of a slowly varying magnetic field that undergoes cyclic changes. A spin-1/2 system is a special case of a two-level system. Another instances are two-level atoms and polarized light, so that also in these cases we should expect to find geometric phases. In fact, the first experimental test of Berry’s phase was done using polarized, classical light (A. Tomita, 1986). Pancharatnam (S. Pancharatnam, 1956) anticipated Berry’s phase when he proposed, back in 1956, how to decide whether two polarization states are “in phase”. Pancharatnam’s prescription is an operational one, based upon observing whether the intensity of the interferogram formed by two polarized beams has maximal intensity. In that case, the two polarized beams are said to be “in phase”. Such a definition is analogous to the definition of distant parallelism in differential geometry. Polarized states can be subjected to different transformations which could be cyclic or not, adiabatic or not, unitary or not. The Pancharatnam-Berry Phase: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects