Causal Analysis of Hidden Variables

Hollis Daniel Williams

Indrajit Sen

In a recent article (arXiv:2108.08144), Hance, Hossenfelder and Palmer have advanced arguments claiming to show that the analysis of Invariant-set theory in a hidden-variable setting (arXiv:2107.04761) is wrong. We explain here why these arguments are incorrect, and involve misunderstandings of the hidden-variable model in question and Bell's notion of local causality.

Patrick Suppes, Mario Zanotti

The primary criterion of adequacy of a probabilistic causal analysis is that the causal variable should render the simultaneous phenomenological data conditionally independent. The intuition back of this idea is that the common cause of the phenomena should factor out the observed correlations. So we label the principle the common cause criterion . If we find that the barometric pressure and temperature are both dropping at the same time, we do not think of one as the cause of the other but look for a common dynamical cause within the physical theory of meteorology. If we find fever and headaches positively correlated, we look for a common disease as the source and do not consider one the cause of the other. But we do not want to suggest that satisfaction of this criterion is the end of the search for causes or probabilistic explanations. It does represent a significant and important milestone in any particular investigation. Under another banner the search for common causes in quantum mechanics is the search for hidden variables. A hidden variable that satisfies the common cause criterion provides a satisfactory explanation “in classical terms” of the quantum phenomenon. Much of the earlier discussion of hidden variables in quantum mechanics has centered around the search for deterministic underlying processes, but for some time now the literature has also been concerned with the existence of probabilistic hidden variables. It is a striking and important fact that even probabilistic hidden variables do not always exist when certain intuitive criteria are imposed.

F. J. Duarte

Stefan Teufel, Karin Berndl, Detlef Dürr +2 more

Motivated by Popescu's example of hidden nonlocality [Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2619 (1995)], we elaborate on the conjecture that quantum states that are intuitively nonlocal, i.e., entangled, do not admit a local causal hidden-variables model. We exhibit quantum states which either (i) are nontrivial counterexamples to this conjecture or (ii) possess a new kind of more deeply hidden irreducible nonlocality. Moreover, we propose a nonlocality complexity classification scheme suggested by the latter possibility. Furthermore, we show that Werner's [Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989)] (and similar) hidden-variables models can be extended to an important class of generalized observables. Finally, a result of Fine [Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291 (1982)] on the equivalence of stochastic and deterministic hidden variables is generalized to causal models.