As introduced in Chapter 1, for many problems in statistical mechanics one is interested in the detailed behavior of only a part of the overall system (call it the system) interacting with its surrounding (call it the environment). In field theory one can accordingly decompose the field describing the overall system ϕ = ϕ S + ϕ E into a sum of the system field ϕ S and the environment field ϕ E . This decomposition is always possible formally but only when there is a clear physical discrepancy between the two sectors will it be physically meaningful and technically implementable. The division could be made between slow and fast variables, low and high frequencies or light and heavy mass sectors. Drawing examples from cosmology, in the stochastic inflation scenario one regards the system field as containing only the lower modes and the environmental field as containing the higher modes with the division provided by the event horizon in de Sitter spacetime. A similar problem in quark-gluon plasma is to ascertain the effect of the hard thermal loops on the soft gluon modes. Another is the effect of the atoms in the noncondensate on the Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC). These cases will be discussed in later chapters. Usually the reason for performing such a decomposition is because one is interested more in the details of the system (the “relevant” variables or the “distinguished” sector), and less in that of the environment (the “irrelevant” variables).
As introduced in Chapter 1, for many problems in statistical mechanics one is interested in the detailed behavior of only a part of the overall system (call it the system) interacting with its surrounding (call it the environment). In field theory one can accordingly decompose the field describing the overall system ϕ = ϕ S + ϕ E into a sum of the system field ϕ S and the environment field ϕ E . This decomposition is always possible formally but only when there is a clear physical discrepancy between the two sectors will it be physically meaningful and technically implementable. The division could be made between slow and fast variables, low and high frequencies or light and heavy mass sectors. Drawing examples from cosmology, in the stochastic inflation scenario one regards the system field as containing only the lower modes and the environmental field as containing the higher modes with the division provided by the event horizon in de Sitter spacetime. A similar problem in quark-gluon plasma is to ascertain the effect of the hard thermal loops on the soft gluon modes. Another is the effect of the atoms in the noncondensate on the Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC). These cases will be discussed in later chapters. Usually the reason for performing such a decomposition is because one is interested more in the details of the system (the “relevant” variables or the “distinguished” sector), and less in that of the environment (the “irrelevant” variables).
One of the major goals in the establishment of a quantum field theory for nonequilibrium systems is to study dynamical problems, following the evolution of the expectation value of a physical variable with respect to an in state. This is different from a scattering problem characterized by the transition amplitude between the in and out states, as is treated in every textbook on quantum field theory. This problem is usually coupled with how one could identify a relevant sector of the theory as the system (light fields vs. heavy fields, slow modes vs. fast modes, long wavelength modes vs. short ones, etc.) and determine the effect of its other sectors as the environment on this system, as we have discussed in the last chapter. Given a classical nonequilibrium system, described, for example, by a Langevin equation, there are essentially three possible strategies to follow. One may attempt to solve it, usually numerically. In the quantum field case, this gets difficult beyond the linear case. Second, one may try to transform it into an equation for the evolution of a probability distribution function in the system's configuration space. In the quantum field case the relevant object is the reduced density matrix, and the relevant equation is the Liouville-von Neumann equation. This is also infeasible beyond the linear case, unless under restrictive approximations (such as Gaussianity) which in fact reduce this approach to the third and coarsest.
Abstract In the interactions of electromagnetic radiation with matter which we have considered so far, we have almost invariably known accurately the state of the system before interaction. As a result the notion of an open system with an external environment did not have to be systematically discussed. In the quantum electrodynamics of elementary particles, the scattering events are predominantly affected by only few-body interactions and the concepts of temperature and environment are irrelevant. (The resolution of the problem of infra-red divergences is an exception where the environment of soft photons is crucial.) For very small numbers of atoms it may be possible to know the initial state of the system, but in a macroscopic device this is essentially impossible. Although for transitions at optical frequencies the temperature of the environment may be negligible, this will not necessarily be the case for microwave transitions. We have already seen how atomic linewidths can be produced by interactions with the bath of photons at zero temperature. In the general case a quantum-mechanical system will show not only fluctuations due to the non-commutative nature of quantum theory but also thermal fluctuations and dissipation due to interactions with the environment. For complicated systems it will not be possible to know with certainty the initial state of the system, and so the approach of studying the evolution of a state vector through the Schrodinger equation has to be replaced by a consideration of the time evolution of the density operator introduced in Chapter 4. We will formulate a systematic way of treating the dynamics of a quantum-mechanical open system interacting with a heat bath, which will be illustrated with important examples.
In the last decade decoherence has become a very popular topic mainly due to the progress in experimental techniques which allow monitoring of the process of decoherence for single microscopic or mesoscopic systems. The other motivation is the rapid development of quantum information and quantum computation theory where decoherence is the main obstacle in the implementation of bold theoretical ideas. All that makes the second improved and extended edition of this book very timely. Despite the enormous efforts of many authors decoherence with its consequences still remains a rather controversial subject. It touches on, namely, the notoriously confusing issues of quantum measurement theory and interpretation of quantum mechanics. The existence of different points of view is reflected by the structure and content of the book. The first three authors (Joos, Zeh and Kiefer) accept the standard formalism of quantum mechanics but seem to reject orthodox Copenhagen interpretation, Giulini and Kupsch stick to both while Stamatescu discusses models which go beyond the standard quantum theory. Fortunately, most of the presented results are independent of the interpretation and the mathematical formalism is common for the (meta)physically different approaches. After a short introduction by Joos followed by a more detailed review of the basic concepts by Zeh, chapter 3 (the longest chapter) by Joos is devoted to the environmental decoherence. Here the author considers mostly rather `down to earth' and well-motivated mechanisms of decoherence through collisions with atoms or molecules and the processes of emission, absorption and scattering of photons. The issues of decoherence induced superselection rules and localization of objects including the possible explanation of the molecular structure are discussed in details. Many other topics are also reviewed in this chapter, e.g., the so-called Zeno effect, relationships between quantum chaos and decoherence, the role of decoherence in quantum information processing and even decoherence in the brain. The next chapter, written by Kiefer, is devoted to decoherence in quantum field theory and quantum gravity which is a much more speculative and less explored topic. Two complementary aspects are studied in this approach: decoherence of particle states by the quantum fields and decoherence of field states by the particles. Cosmological issues related to decoherence are discussed, not only within the standard Friedmann cosmology, but also using the elements of the theory of black holes, wormholes and strings. The relations between the formalism of consistent histories defined in terms of decoherence functionals and the environmental decoherence are discussed in chapter 5, also written by Kiefer. The Feynman--Vernon influence functional for the quantum open system is presented in detail as the first example of decoherence functional. Then the general theory is outlined together with possible interpretations including cosmological aspects. The next chapter by Giulini presents an overview of the superselection rules arising from physical symmetries and gauge transformations both for nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. Critical discussion of kinematical superselection rules versus dynamical ones is illustrated by numerous examples like Galilei invariant quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics and quantum gravity. The introduction to the theory of quantum open systems and its applications to decoherence models is given in chapter 7 by Kupsch. Generalized master equations, Markovian approximation and a few Hamiltonian models relevant for decoherence are discussed. Some mathematical tools, e.g., complete positivity and entropy inequalities are also presented. The last chapter by Stamatescu is devoted to stochastic collapse models which can be interpreted either as certain representations of the dynamics of open quantum systems or as fundamental modifications of the Schr\"odinger equation. The final part of the book consists of remarks by Zeh on related concepts and methods and seven appendices. The broad spectrum, mathematically-friendly presentation, inclusion of the very recent developments and the extensive bibliography (about 550 references) make this book a valuable reference for all researchers, graduate and PhD students interested in the foundations of quantum mechanics, quantum open systems and quantum information. The relative independence of the chapters and numerous redundancies allow for selective reading, which is very helpful for newcomers to this field.
Perhaps due to its technical complexity, oftentimes one sees in research papers on nonequilibrium quantum field theory (NEqQFT) more emphasis placed on the field-theoretical formalisms than the ideas these sophisticated techniques attempt to capture, or the issues such problems embody. All the more so, we need some basic understanding of the important issues and concepts in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics (NEqSM), and how they are manifested in the context of quantum field theory. Many important advances in this field came from asking such questions and finding out how to answer them in the language of quantum field theory. Because of this somewhat skewed existing emphasis in NEqQFT, and since we do not assume the reader to have had a formal course on NEqSM before, we shall give a brief summary of the basic concepts of NEqSM relevant to the field-theoretical processes discussed in this book. Many fine monographs and reviews written on this subject take a more formal mathematical approach. approach. Since our purpose here is to familiarize readers with these issues and their subtleties, rather than training them to work in the rich field of NEqSM (which includes in addition to the traditional subject matter such as the projection operator formalism and open system concepts, also current topics at their foundation, such as dynamical systems and quantum chaos), we choose to approach these topics in a more intuitive and physical way, sacrificing by necessity rigor and completeness.
Rare fluctuations in physical systems depend on the detailed microphysics responsible for the fluctuations. In classical statistical systems, the large deviation principle has elucidated the role of semi-classics in describing this regime, and has simultaneously provided a the mathematical foundation of statistical mechanics. Large deviation theory for quantum system is considerably less developed. As all physical systems are fundamentally quantum mechanical, this leaves a major gap in our understanding of rare fluctuations relevant to statistical physics, cosmology, and more. In this paper, we develop the practical aspects of the theory of large deviations relevant for calculating rare events in physical systems from quantum walks to cosmology. We first analyze the case of the anharmonic oscillator coupled to a bath, showing explicitly how the system evolves from dominantly statistical (e.g. thermal) to quantum fluctuations. We then generalize these results, showing that the dominant rare fluctuations minimize the measurement-induced relative entropy. This perspective provides a thermodynamic description of a wide range of open quantum systems. We apply these results to random walks that arise in cosmology through stochastic inflation. We show that the evolution of the density matrix of long wavelength fields on a fixed de Sitter background breaks the KMS symmetry, giving rise to a stationary density matrix that does not respect detailed balance.
For the next several chapters we will mainly be focusing on the behavior of a medium with nonlinear susceptibility in an optical cavity. This will entail a detour through the quantum theory of open systems. All physical systems are coupled to the ‘outside world’ to some extent. We call such a system an open system, and the part of the ‘outside world’ that is coupled to it is called a reservoir. If the coupling is very weak, we can ignore it and treat the system as closed. For the systems of interest here, we must take the coupling to the outside world into account, and, in particular, we need a way to see how this coupling affects the dynamics of the system itself. In the case of a nonlinear medium in a cavity, some of the light leaves the cavity, so the light inside the cavity is coupled to modes outside the cavity. In addition, in order to measure a system, we have to couple it to another system. There are two main ways of treating open quantum systems, namely quantum Langevin equations and master equations. Both methods will be treated here. Reservoir Hamiltonians Now let us begin our analysis of open systems. We have a system with degrees of freedom in which we are interested, but these degrees of freedom are coupled to excitations or modes about whose detailed dynamics we do not care. These degrees of freedom in which we are not interested are called reservoirs.